Kim Yujin, Cho Yoonkyoung, Koo Bonjae, Chen Zhangling, Sun Qi, Oh Hannah
Interdisciplinary Program in Precision Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01297-8.
Studies suggest a positive association between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and type 2 diabetes risk. However, studies were primarily conducted in Western populations with diets and disease profiles different from populations living elsewhere. In addition, the dose-response relationship needs to be further elucidated. We conducted an individual-level pooled analysis of three Korean prospective cohorts (n = 72,776). UPF intake (in the percentage of g/d as the main UPF unit) was assessed using validated food frequency questionnaires and categorized according to Nova classification. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We subsequently conducted a meta-analysis of prospective studies, including recent studies from both Western and non-Western populations, to assess the dose-response relationship. In a pooled analysis of Korean cohorts (up to 18 years of follow-up), the highest (vs. lowest) quartile of UPF intake was associated with an increased type 2 diabetes risk (pooled HR [95% CI] = 1.11 [1.02, 1.21] , p-trend = 0.03). The positive association persisted after additional adjustment for BMI, nutritional factors (fiber, sodium, and carbohydrate intakes), or diet quality score. Among individual UPF subgroups, processed meats, ready-to-eat/heat mixed dishes, and ice cream were positively associated with diabetes risk. In a meta-analysis of 17 prospective cohorts, every 10% (of g/d) increment in UPF intake was associated with a 10% (summary RR [95% CI] = 1.10 [1.08, 1.12] ) higher risk in a dose-response fashion. Our meta-evidence supports that higher UPF intake may monotonically increase type 2 diabetes risk.
研究表明,超加工食品(UPF)摄入量与2型糖尿病风险之间存在正相关。然而,这些研究主要在西方人群中进行,其饮食和疾病特征与其他地区的人群不同。此外,剂量反应关系还需要进一步阐明。我们对三个韩国前瞻性队列(n = 72,776)进行了个体水平的汇总分析。使用经过验证的食物频率问卷评估UPF摄入量(以克/天的百分比作为主要UPF单位),并根据诺瓦分类法进行分类。采用Cox比例风险模型估计风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。随后,我们对前瞻性研究进行了荟萃分析,包括来自西方和非西方人群的近期研究,以评估剂量反应关系。在对韩国队列的汇总分析(随访长达18年)中,UPF摄入量最高(与最低)四分位数与2型糖尿病风险增加相关(汇总HR [95% CI] = 1.11 [1.02, 1.21],p趋势 = 0.03)。在对体重指数、营养因素(纤维、钠和碳水化合物摄入量)或饮食质量评分进行额外调整后,这种正相关仍然存在。在个体UPF亚组中,加工肉类、即食/加热混合菜肴和冰淇淋与糖尿病风险呈正相关。在对17个前瞻性队列的荟萃分析中,UPF摄入量每增加10%(克/天),风险就会以剂量反应的方式增加10%(汇总RR [95% CI] = 1.10 [1.08, 1.12])。我们的荟萃证据支持,较高的UPF摄入量可能会单调增加2型糖尿病风险。