Suppr超能文献

针对住院痴呆症患者的体育活动干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Physical activity interventions for hospitalised people living with dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Elliott Emma, Ventre Jodi, Smith Sarah Kate, Carey William, Eost-Telling Charlotte, Money Annemarie, Bryce-Jones Toby, Dickens Victoria, Todd Chris J, Vardy Emma R L C

机构信息

NIHR-ARC Greater Manchester, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9NQ, UK.

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01304-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

People living with dementia are vulnerable to adverse outcomes of hospitalisation, such as functional decline and deconditioning. The aim of this review was to examine the effectiveness of hospital-based interventions involving physical activity on deconditioning outcomes in people living with dementia.

METHODS

Five databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) were searched to January 2025 to identify eligible studies. Two researchers independently carried out screening, data extraction and quality assessment.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

adults with a diagnosis of dementia, acute hospital admission, and interventions involving physical activity during hospitalisation. Data were pooled for strength, balance, functional outcomes, readmission, falls, length of stay, and delirium. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

2179 records were identified and six studies (n = 576 with dementia) included: one randomised-controlled trial, five non-randomised or quasi-randomised. Studies were conducted in an "acute care for elders unit" (n = 2), acute psychogeriatric ward (n = 2), general medical unit (n = 1), and geriatric rehabilitation ward (n = 1) across six countries. In meta-analyses, there was less decline in basic activities of daily living at 3 months in the physical activity group (change from pre-admission status); two studies, mean difference 1.27 (95% CI 0.36-2.18) but there were no differences found in all other outcomes at discharge or 3 months, compared to usual care. Certainty of the evidence is low/very low.

CONCLUSION

Due to the limited available evidence, there is uncertainty about the effect of physical activity interventions above usual care. More high-quality research is needed to improve outcomes for people living with dementia in hospital.

摘要

目的

痴呆症患者容易出现住院的不良后果,如功能衰退和身体机能下降。本综述的目的是研究基于医院的身体活动干预对痴呆症患者身体机能下降结果的有效性。

方法

检索了五个数据库(MEDLINE、CENTRAL、Embase、PsycINFO和CINAHL)至2025年1月,以确定符合条件的研究。两名研究人员独立进行筛选、数据提取和质量评估。

纳入标准

诊断为痴呆症的成年人、急性住院以及住院期间涉及身体活动的干预措施。汇总了有关力量、平衡、功能结果、再入院、跌倒、住院时间和谵妄的数据。我们使用GRADE来评估证据的确定性。

结果

共识别出2179条记录,纳入六项研究(n = 576例痴呆症患者):一项随机对照试验,五项非随机或准随机试验。研究在六个国家的“老年急性护理单元”(n = 2)、急性老年精神科病房(n = 2)、普通内科病房(n = 1)和老年康复病房(n = 1)进行。在荟萃分析中,身体活动组在3个月时日常生活基本活动的下降较少(与入院前状态相比的变化);两项研究,平均差异为1.27(95%CI 0.36 - 2.18),但与常规护理相比,出院时或3个月时的所有其他结果均未发现差异。证据的确定性为低/极低。

结论

由于现有证据有限,身体活动干预高于常规护理的效果尚不确定。需要更多高质量的研究来改善住院痴呆症患者的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验