Suppr超能文献

阴茎神经阻滞引起的局部麻醉药全身毒性:一项系统评价。

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity induced by penile nerve block: A systematic review.

作者信息

Park Miyeong, Lee Soo Hee, Sohn Ju-Tae

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital 11, Samjeongja-ro, Seongsan-gu, Changwon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 12;104(37):e44582. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044582.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Local anesthetics are widely used by non-anesthesiologists to provide analgesia. Penile nerve blocks are used for analgesia during urological surgery. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), which is rare but likely fatal, is often caused by a penile nerve block. However, there has been no analysis of cases of LAST induced by a penile nerve block. This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review aimed to analyze case reports involving LAST induced by a penile nerve block, with a particular focus on the presumed causes, local anesthetics, and lipid emulsion treatment.

METHODS

Relevant case reports included in PubMed from inception to December 31, 2024, were retrieved using the keywords "penile nerve block," "dorsal penile nerve block," "penile block," "local anesthetic toxicity," "local anesthetic systemic toxicity," and "local anesthetic overdose."

RESULTS

Eleven case reports including 19 patients were obtained. The main presumed causes of penile nerve block-induced LAST were overdose (47.4%) and inadvertent intravascular absorption (47.4%) of local anesthetics. The main local anesthetics associated with overdose and inadvertent intravascular absorption were lidocaine (77.8%) and bupivacaine (88.9%), respectively. Of the patients, 89.5% had risk factors for LAST. Of the patients with LAST, 31.6% received lipid emulsion plus supportive treatment. The age distribution of patients with penile nerve block-induced LAST was as follows: <1 year (73.7%), ≥1 year to <19 years (15.8%), and ≥19 years (10.5%). A penile nerve block was used for circumcision in 84.2% of the cases. The most common symptoms of penile nerve block-induced LAST were cardiovascular symptoms (52.6%) and central nervous system symptoms (42.1%). The negative aspiration technique was used to prevent LAST in 47.4% of patients. All patients recovered from LAST.

CONCLUSION

LAST in infants and neonates receiving a penile nerve block for circumcision is mainly caused by lidocaine overdose or inadvertent intravascular absorption of bupivacaine. The following measures should be considered to prevent LAST: adherence to the maximum recommended dose of local anesthetics; awareness of LAST risk factors; slow injection of the local anesthetic with minimal pressure and negative aspiration; and lipid emulsion preparation.

摘要

背景

局部麻醉剂被非麻醉医生广泛用于提供镇痛。阴茎神经阻滞用于泌尿外科手术中的镇痛。局部麻醉剂全身毒性(LAST)虽罕见但可能致命,常由阴茎神经阻滞引起。然而,尚无对阴茎神经阻滞所致LAST病例的分析。本项符合系统评价与Meta分析优先报告项目标准的系统评价旨在分析涉及阴茎神经阻滞所致LAST的病例报告,特别关注推测的病因、局部麻醉剂及脂质乳剂治疗情况。

方法

使用关键词“阴茎神经阻滞”“阴茎背神经阻滞”“阴茎阻滞”“局部麻醉剂毒性”“局部麻醉剂全身毒性”和“局部麻醉剂过量”检索PubMed中从创刊至2024年12月31日收录的相关病例报告。

结果

共获得11篇病例报告,涉及19例患者。阴茎神经阻滞所致LAST的主要推测病因是局部麻醉剂过量(47.4%)和意外血管内吸收(47.4%)。与过量和意外血管内吸收相关的主要局部麻醉剂分别是利多卡因(77.8%)和布比卡因(88.9%)。89.5%的患者存在LAST的危险因素。发生LAST的患者中,31.6%接受了脂质乳剂加支持治疗。阴茎神经阻滞所致LAST患者的年龄分布如下:<1岁(73.7%)、≥1岁至<19岁(15.8%)和≥19岁(10.5%)。84.2%的病例中阴茎神经阻滞用于包皮环切术。阴茎神经阻滞所致LAST最常见的症状是心血管症状(52.6%)和中枢神经系统症状(42.1%)。47.4%的患者采用回抽技术预防LAST。所有患者均从LAST中康复。

结论

接受阴茎神经阻滞进行包皮环切术的婴儿和新生儿发生LAST主要由利多卡因过量或布比卡因意外血管内吸收引起。应考虑采取以下措施预防LAST:遵守局部麻醉剂的最大推荐剂量;了解LAST的危险因素;以最小压力缓慢注射局部麻醉剂并进行回抽;准备脂质乳剂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验