Zhao Lei, Mei Dan, Ge Xiaolin, Shi Yujing, Sun Xinchen, Liang Liang
Department of Oncology, Jurong Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Zhen Jiang, China.
Department of Clinical Research Coordination, Nanjing Yuzhong Medical Consulting Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 12;104(37):e44451. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044451.
The prognosis for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 30%. There are significant differences in prognosis among patients, and some patients experience local recurrence and distant metastasis within 1 year after comprehensive treatment. Therefore, there is an urgent need for highly sensitive and specific biomarkers to assess the therapeutic risks and prognosis of patients with inoperable esophageal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the LabBM score in the survival of patients with inoperable ESCC. A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including 150 and 155 patients with unresectable ESCC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our hospital between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2018, and between July 1, 2018, and March 1, 2020, respectively, as the training and validation cohorts. Laboratory parameters, including lactate dehydrogenase, platelet count, C-reactive protein, and albumin, were collected 1 week prior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The LabBM score was calculated, and survival differences were analyzed across patients with different LabBM scores. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess factors influencing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), aiming to clarify the prognostic value of the LabBM score for PFS and OS. In the training group, of the 150 patients enrolled, 123 were in the low LabBM group (0-1), 23 in the medium LabBM group (1.5-2), and 4 in the high LabBM group (2.5-3.5). The median survival was 33 months in the low LabBM group, 11 months in the medium LabBM group, and 6.5 months in the high LabBM group, with a significant difference in survival between the 3 groups (P = .000). Univariate Cox analysis showed that a higher LabBM score was associated with worse OS (P < .05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a higher LabBM score (hazard ratios: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.08-7.03, P = .034) was an independent influencing factor for OS. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the AUC area for OS and PFS predicted by the LabBM-based risk model was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97, P = .00) and 0.956 (95% CI: 0.88-0.98, P = .000), respectively. The AUC for LabBM scores predicting OS and PFS were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.72, P = .011) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.52-0.70, P = .039), respectively. The AUC area of the risk model was significantly higher than that of other single parameters. Subsequently, we re-enrolled 155 patients with inoperable esophageal cancer in different time periods for the above analysis, and the results were consistent with the experimental group. In inoperable ESCC patients, the LabBM score-based risk model is a novel and effective prognostic indicator.
食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的预后较差,5年生存率约为30%。患者之间的预后存在显著差异,一些患者在综合治疗后1年内出现局部复发和远处转移。因此,迫切需要高度敏感和特异的生物标志物来评估不可切除食管癌患者的治疗风险和预后。本研究旨在探讨LabBM评分在不可切除ESCC患者生存中的预测价值。进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,分别将2013年1月1日至2018年6月30日以及2018年7月1日至2020年3月1日期间在我院接受同步放化疗的150例和155例不可切除ESCC患者作为训练队列和验证队列。在同步放化疗前1周收集实验室参数,包括乳酸脱氢酶、血小板计数、C反应蛋白和白蛋白。计算LabBM评分,并分析不同LabBM评分患者的生存差异。采用Cox回归和Kaplan-Meier分析评估影响无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的因素,旨在阐明LabBM评分对PFS和OS的预后价值。在训练组的150例患者中,低LabBM组(0 - 1分)有123例,中LabBM组(1.5 - 2分)有23例,高LabBM组(2.5 - 3.5分)有4例。低LabBM组的中位生存期为33个月,中LabBM组为11个月,高LabBM组为6.5个月,三组生存差异有统计学意义(P = .000)。单因素Cox分析显示,较高的LabBM评分与较差的OS相关(P < .05)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,较高的LabBM评分(风险比:2.75,95%CI:1.08 - 7.03,P = .034)是OS的独立影响因素。在受试者工作特征分析中,基于LabBM的风险模型预测OS和PFS的AUC面积分别为0.92(95%CI:0.86 - 0.97,P = .00)和0.956(95%CI:0.88 - 0.98,P = .000)。LabBM评分预测OS和PFS的AUC分别为0.63(95%CI:0.54 - 0.72,P = .011)和0.61(95%CI:0.52 - 0.70,P = .039)。风险模型的AUC面积显著高于其他单个参数。随后,我们在不同时间段重新纳入155例不可切除食管癌患者进行上述分析,结果与实验组一致。在不可切除的ESCC患者中,基于LabBM评分的风险模型是一种新型有效的预后指标。