• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术后残余结石及结石复发的危险因素分析

Analysis of risk factors for residual stones and stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stone.

作者信息

Meng Rui, Lv Xiaoyong, Wang Jiandong, Han Yu, Zhai Zhipeng

机构信息

Department of Urology, YuQuan Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital - Miyun Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 12;104(37):e44191. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044191.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000044191
PMID:40958314
Abstract

This study explores the risk factors for residual stones and stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), aiming to assist in clinical practice to improve the stone clearance rate, reduce the stone recurrence rate, and enhance the surgical outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 367 patients with ureteral stone who underwent ESWL from February 2022 to February 2025. Among them, 328 patients had complete data. General clinical data, stone characteristics, and follow-up data of the patients were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on the risk factors for residual stones and stone recurrence after ESWL. In this study, the stone clearance rate after ESWL was 85.37% (280/328), and the stone recurrence rate within 3 months after the operation was 20.36% (57/280). Univariate logistic regression analysis found that body mass index (P = .048), stone size (P < .001), stone density (P = .020), and preoperative serum creatinine (P = .045) were risk factors for residual stones after ESWL. Gender (P = .038), coronary heart disease (CHD, P = .024), and stone density (P = .037) were risk factors for stone recurrence after ESWL. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that stone size (P < .001), stone hardness (P = .036), and preoperative serum creatinine (P = .008) were independent risk factors for residual stones after ESWL. CHD (P = .046) and stone density (P = .046) were independent risk factors for stone recurrence after ESWL. ESWL for ureteral stone has a relatively high stone clearance rate and stone recurrence rate. body mass index, stone size, stone density, and preoperative serum creatinine are independent risk factors for residual stones after ESWL. CHD and stone density are independent risk factors for stone recurrence after ESWL.

摘要

本研究探讨体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后残留结石及结石复发的危险因素,旨在辅助临床实践提高结石清除率、降低结石复发率并改善手术效果。对2022年2月至2025年2月期间接受ESWL的367例输尿管结石患者进行回顾性分析。其中,328例患者有完整数据。收集患者的一般临床资料、结石特征及随访数据。对ESWL后残留结石及结石复发的危险因素进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析。本研究中,ESWL后的结石清除率为85.37%(280/328),术后3个月内的结石复发率为20.36%(57/280)。单因素logistic回归分析发现,体重指数(P = 0.048)、结石大小(P < 0.001)、结石密度(P = 0.020)及术前血清肌酐(P = 0.045)是ESWL后残留结石的危险因素。性别(P = 0.038)、冠心病(CHD,P = 0.024)及结石密度(P = 0.037)是ESWL后结石复发的危险因素。多因素logistic回归分析显示,结石大小(P < 0.001)、结石硬度(P = 0.036)及术前血清肌酐(P = 0.008)是ESWL后残留结石的独立危险因素。CHD(P = 0.046)及结石密度(P = 0.046)是ESWL后结石复发的独立危险因素。输尿管结石ESWL的结石清除率和结石复发率相对较高。体重指数、结石大小、结石密度及术前血清肌酐是ESWL后残留结石的独立危险因素。CHD和结石密度是ESWL后结石复发的独立危险因素。

相似文献

1
Analysis of risk factors for residual stones and stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stone.输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术后残余结石及结石复发的危险因素分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 12;104(37):e44191. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044191.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub3.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 与经皮肾镜碎石取石术 (PCNL) 或逆行肾内手术 (RIRS) 治疗肾结石的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub4.
5
Predicting ESWL success for ureteral stones: a radiomics-based machine learning approach.预测输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的成功率:一种基于影像组学的机器学习方法。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01817-8.
6
Safety and effectiveness of external shock wave lithotripsy in emergency: A narrative review.体外冲击波碎石术在急诊中的安全性和有效性:一项叙述性综述。
Fr J Urol. 2025 Jun;35(5):102866. doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102866. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
8
Extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub2.
9
Ureteroscopy vs Shockwave Lithotripsy to Remove Kidney Stones in Children and Adolescents: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.输尿管镜检查与冲击波碎石术治疗儿童及青少年肾结石的比较:一项非随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525789. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25789.
10
CT-based AI model for predicting therapeutic outcomes in ureteral stones after single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy through a cohort study.通过一项队列研究建立基于CT的人工智能模型,用于预测单次体外冲击波碎石术后输尿管结石的治疗效果。
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6601-6609. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001820.