• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用负载分担防撕裂结构对大型和巨大肩袖损伤进行手术修复后肩袖愈合的磁共振评估:令人鼓舞的结果。

Magnetic resonance evaluation of rotator cuff healing after surgical repair of large and massive lesions using the load-sharing rip-stop construct: encouraging results.

作者信息

Meyer Kautsky Raul, Ejnisman Benno, Leite Junior Juarez, de Figueiredo Eduardo Antônio, Azeredo Costa Ricardo, Simmer Filho Jair

机构信息

Hospital Santa Rita-Vitória, Brazil.

Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2025 Mar 27;9(4):1145-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.02.020. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2025.02.020
PMID:40959004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12435038/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tendon healing rate in large and massive tears using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on the Sugaya classification and to present the functional outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California, Los Angeles, and visual analog scale scores) in patients who underwent the Load-Sharing Rip-Stop (LSRS) suture technique. These patients often present with retracted lesions, limited mobility, poor-quality tissues prone to tearing, medial tears, and/or insufficient bone quality (osteopenia or osteoporosis).

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of patients aged > 55 years who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair due to retracted tears (that after appropriate releases, it was not possible to cover more than 50% of the tendon footprint on the greater tuberosity upon rotator cuff traction), operated between 2014 and 2022, using the LSRS technique, and who underwent a minimum follow-up of 1 year, including postoperative MRI assessment.

RESULTS

Eighteen shoulders were included in the study and all of them performed a postoperative MRI; 1 patient experienced tendon rerupture on follow-up MRI, corresponding to a 5.56% failure rate. In the functional analysis, 16 shoulders (88.89%) scored above 80 on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and had satisfactory results on the University of California, Los Angeles score (rated as excellent and good).

CONCLUSION

In an average follow-up of 28 months, the LSRS suture technique demonstrated satisfactory functional outcomes and a good healing rate in patients with retracted and low-mobility rotator cuff injuries. These findings reinforce the idea that the LSRS technique can be a valuable option in managing these challenging cases.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是基于Sugaya分类法,使用磁共振成像(MRI)评估大型和巨大撕裂伤的肌腱愈合率,并展示接受负荷分担撕裂停止(LSRS)缝合技术的患者的功能结果(美国肩肘外科医师协会、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校评分以及视觉模拟量表评分)。这些患者常出现回缩性损伤、活动受限、易撕裂的低质量组织、内侧撕裂和/或骨质不佳(骨质减少或骨质疏松)。

方法

对2014年至2022年间接受手术、年龄大于55岁、因回缩性撕裂伤(经适当松解后,肩袖牵引时无法覆盖大结节上超过50%的肌腱足迹)接受关节镜下肩袖修复、采用LSRS技术且至少随访1年(包括术后MRI评估)的患者进行回顾性评估。

结果

本研究纳入了18个肩部,所有患者均进行了术后MRI检查;1例患者在随访MRI时出现肌腱再次断裂,失败率为5.56%。在功能分析中,16个肩部(88.89%)的美国肩肘外科医师协会评分为80分以上,加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校评分结果令人满意(评为优秀和良好)。

结论

在平均28个月的随访中,LSRS缝合技术在回缩性和低活动度肩袖损伤患者中显示出令人满意的功能结果和良好的愈合率。这些发现强化了LSRS技术可成为处理这些具有挑战性病例的宝贵选择这一观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/12435038/294dbd1e491c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/12435038/ecec240d307b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/12435038/e596f476708f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/12435038/c6a128972186/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/12435038/294dbd1e491c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/12435038/ecec240d307b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/12435038/e596f476708f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/12435038/c6a128972186/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/12435038/294dbd1e491c/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Magnetic resonance evaluation of rotator cuff healing after surgical repair of large and massive lesions using the load-sharing rip-stop construct: encouraging results.使用负载分担防撕裂结构对大型和巨大肩袖损伤进行手术修复后肩袖愈合的磁共振评估:令人鼓舞的结果。
JSES Int. 2025 Mar 27;9(4):1145-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.02.020. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.单排和双排关节镜下肩袖修复的结果:系统评价。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):732-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01295.
3
Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered.磁共振成像、磁共振关节造影和超声检查用于评估考虑手术治疗的肩部疼痛患者的肩袖撕裂情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 24;2013(9):CD009020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009020.pub2.
4
Comparison of clinical and biomechanical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using conventional and triple-row suture-bridge techniques.采用传统和双排缝线桥技术进行关节镜下肩袖修补的临床和生物力学结果比较。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2025 May-Aug;33(2):10225536251364198. doi: 10.1177/10225536251364198. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
5
Is the Use of a Buprenorphine Transdermal Patch More Effective Than Oral Medications for Postoperative Analgesia After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Randomized Clinical Trial.对于关节镜下肩袖修补术后的镇痛,丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂的使用是否比口服药物更有效?一项随机临床试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):857-865. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003303. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
6
Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma as an Adjuvant to Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Reduces the Retear Rate But Does Not Improve Functional Outcomes: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.贫白细胞富血小板血浆作为关节镜肩袖修复的辅助手段可降低再撕裂率,但不能改善功能结局:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 May;52(6):1403-1410. doi: 10.1177/03635465241239062. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
7
Different types of rotator cuff tear morphology do not affect post-repair clinical outcomes in large to massive tears.不同类型的肩袖撕裂形态不会影响大到巨大撕裂修复后的临床结果。
J ISAKOS. 2024 Feb;9(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.10.014. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
8
Clinical comparison of arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with or without long head of biceps tendon transposition.关节镜下双排肩袖修补术伴或不伴肱二头肌长头腱转位的临床比较
World J Orthop. 2025 Jun 18;16(6):103875. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.103875.
9
[Early effectiveness of arthroscopic modified tri-anchor double-pulley suture-bridge technique in repairing medium-sized supraspinatus tendon tears].关节镜下改良三锚双滑车缝合桥技术修复中型冈上肌腱撕裂的早期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 15;39(6):708-714. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202501065.
10
Leptin Enhances M1 Macrophage Polarization and Impairs Tendon-Bone Healing in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Rat Model.瘦素增强M1巨噬细胞极化并损害肩袖修复中肌腱-骨愈合:大鼠模型
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):939-951. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003428. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial Commentary: One- and 2-Year Outcomes Are Clinically Similar After Rotator Cuff Repair: What Are We Waiting For?社论评论:肩袖修复后 1 年和 2 年的临床结果相似:我们还在等什么?
Arthroscopy. 2024 Apr;40(4):1073-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.11.002. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
2
Rip-Stop Fixation Constructs for Rotator Cuff Repair.用于肩袖修复的防裂固定结构。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Nov;39(11):2271-2272. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.013.
3
One- and 2-Year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores Do Not Vary Significantly After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of 1,567 Patients.
关节镜下肩袖修复术后 1 年和 2 年美国肩肘外科医生评分无显著差异:一项对 1567 例患者的前瞻性多中心分析。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Apr;40(4):1066-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.09.024. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
4
Blended Suture-bridge Technique for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下肩袖修补的混合缝线桥技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Mar 27;12(4):e569-e574. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.12.011. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Review of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes.关节镜下肩袖修复术:手术技术与疗效的综述。
Clin Sports Med. 2023 Jan;42(1):81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2022.08.004.
6
Rotator cuff repair with single row technique provides satisfying clinical results despite consistent MRI retear rate.尽管磁共振成像(MRI)显示再撕裂率持续存在,但采用单排技术进行肩袖修复仍能提供令人满意的临床效果。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 May 4;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00642-x.
7
Retear rates after rotator cuff surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肩袖手术后的再撕裂率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 31;22(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04634-6.
8
Retear bigger than preoperative tear size would lead to treatment failure after rotator cuff repair.撕裂大于术前撕裂大小会导致肩袖修复后治疗失败。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Feb;31(2):310-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
9
Inter-rater agreement of rotator cuff tendon and muscle magnetic resonance imaging parameters evaluated preoperatively and during the first postoperative year following rotator cuff repair.肩袖肌腱和肌肉磁共振成像参数的评估在肩袖修复术前和术后第一年的组内一致性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Dec;30(12):e741-e752. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.021. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
Postoperative rotator cuff integrity: can we consider type 3 Sugaya classification as retear?术后肩袖完整性:我们能否将 Sugaya 3 型分类视为再撕裂?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan;30(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 Jun 9.