Suppr超能文献

在反式全肩关节置换术中,肩关节的侧方化和远侧化角度可能无法预测临床结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Lateralization and distalization shoulder angles may not predict clinical outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Surucu Serkan, Okutan Ahmet E, Lee Michael S, MacLeod James S, Kodra Jacob D, Fong Scott, Moran Jay, Donohue Kenneth, Graf Alexander R, Jimenez Andrew E

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsun University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2025 Apr 30;9(4):1303-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.004. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA) following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were queried on February 18, 2024. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies reporting correlations between LSA, DSA, and patient-reported outcome scores in patients undergoing rTSA with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Study quality was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with correlation coefficients (r) calculated via Fisher's z-transformation. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Q test and I values.

RESULTS

After screening, 4 studies met inclusion criteria, representing a total of 974 shoulders with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The studies included retrospective cohort designs with Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scores ranging from 14 to 15. Meta-analysis revealed no significant correlation between LSA or DSA and functional outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score) or range of motion (ROM) (active anterior elevation [AAE] and active external rotation). The overall correlation coefficient for LSA and DSA with postoperative outcomes was 0.023 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.056 to 0.101, = .572). Similarly, no significant correlations were found between LSA or DSA and AAE or active external rotation, with the random effects model showing an effect size of -0.097 (95% CI: -0.231 to 0.037, = .156) for AAE and DSA and 0.056 (95% CI: -0.052 to 0.165, = .309) for AAE and LSA.

CONCLUSION

DSA and LSA may not predict the postoperative range of motion or clinical outcomes following rTSA. Future studies are warranted to develop and validate measurements of that can be used to help optimize patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)后外展肩角(LSA)和下移肩角(DSA)的预后价值。

方法

本系统评价按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行。于2024年2月18日检索了PubMed、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和Scopus。纳入标准包括报告接受rTSA且至少随访2年的患者的LSA、DSA与患者报告的结局评分之间相关性的研究。使用非随机研究方法学指数评分评估研究质量。采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析,通过Fisher z变换计算相关系数(r)。用Q检验和I²值评估异质性。

结果

筛选后,4项研究符合纳入标准,共涉及974个肩关节,最短随访时间为24个月。这些研究包括回顾性队列设计,非随机研究方法学指数评分范围为14至15。Meta分析显示,LSA或DSA与功能结局(美国肩肘外科医师评分、Constant评分)或活动范围(ROM)(主动前屈[AAE]和主动外旋)之间无显著相关性。LSA和DSA与术后结局的总体相关系数为0.023(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.056至0.101,P = 0.572)。同样,在LSA或DSA与AAE或主动外旋之间未发现显著相关性,随机效应模型显示,AAE与DSA的效应大小为-0.097(95%CI:-0.231至0.037,P = 0.156),AAE与LSA的效应大小为0.056(95%CI:-0.052至0.165,P = 0.309)。

结论

DSA和LSA可能无法预测rTSA术后的活动范围或临床结局。未来有必要开展研究,开发并验证可用于帮助优化患者结局的测量方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be0/12434949/1325f6c97491/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验