Deng Qingping, Liu Yuanyuan, Rong Hui, Liu Qing, Yang Rongyuan
State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.
Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China.
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jul 28;22(14):3511-3527. doi: 10.7150/ijms.114372. eCollection 2025.
The gut-lung axis represents a critical pathway potentially modulating COVID-19 pathogenesis. We employed meta-analysis to investigate the Mendelian randomization (MR) studies for the putative causal relationships between gut microbiota composition/metabolites and COVID-19 severity. Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of MR studies (PubMed/Web of Science/Embase/Scopus/Cochrane; inception to June 2024). Data from 11 studies (aggregating 32,748,274 participants; 1,487 SNPs) underwent meta-analysis across four COVID-19 severity strata including susceptibility, infection, hospitalization, and critical disease. Study quality was evaluated using a validated MR framework assessing 32 core assumptions. Elevated COVID-19 susceptibility risk was associated with (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.26) and (1.06, 1.03-1.09), whereas protective effects emerged for (0.84, 0.71-0.99) and (0.88, 0.78-0.99). For COVID-19 infection, conferred increased risk (1.13, 1.02-1.26), while the torques group (0.54, 0.39-0.74) and (0.90, 0.83-0.97) demonstrated protection. Hospitalization risk elevated with (1.13, 1.04-1.22) and (1.25, 1.07-1.45), contrasting with (0.97, 0.94-0.99) and 6 (0.81, 0.69-0.94) showing protective associations. Severe COVID-19 risk increased with (1.20, 1.01-1.42), (2.09, 1.15-3.81), and (1.66, 1.36-2.01), while (0.84, 0.76-0.92) and (0.82, 0.76-0.89) exhibited protection. Notably, , and constituted consistent risk factors across severity strata, whereas and showed trans-stage protective effects. production specifically attenuated hospitalization risk, and demonstrated strikingly elevated critical disease risk, contrasting with typical probiotic associations. This meta-analysis of MR studies provides robust evidence for severity-specific causal effects of the gut microbiota on COVID-19 outcomes. The identified microbial taxa and metabolites provide potential biomarkers for clinical risk stratification and targets for novel adjuvant therapeutic strategies.
肠-肺轴是一条可能调节新冠病毒肺炎发病机制的关键途径。我们采用荟萃分析来研究孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,以探讨肠道微生物群组成/代谢物与新冠病毒肺炎严重程度之间的假定因果关系。遵循PRISMA 2020指南,我们对MR研究进行了系统综述(PubMed/科学网/Embase/Scopus/Cochrane;起始至2024年6月)。来自11项研究(总计32748274名参与者;1487个单核苷酸多态性)的数据在包括易感性、感染、住院和危重症四个新冠病毒肺炎严重程度分层中进行了荟萃分析。使用经过验证的评估32个核心假设的MR框架评估研究质量。新冠病毒肺炎易感性风险升高与 (比值比1.16,95%置信区间1.06 - 1.26)和 (1.06,1.03 - 1.09)相关,而 (0.84,0.71 - 0.99)和 (0.88,0.78 - 0.99)显示出保护作用。对于新冠病毒肺炎感染, 带来风险增加(1.13,1.02 - 1.26),而 扭矩组(0.54,0.39 - 0.74)和 (0.90,0.83 - 0.97)显示出保护作用。住院风险随着 (1.13,1.04 - 1.22)和 (1.25,1.07 - 1.45)升高,与之形成对比的是 (0.97,0.94 - 0.99)和6(0.81,0.69 - 0.94)显示出保护关联。重症新冠病毒肺炎风险随着 (1.20,1.01 - 1.42)、 (2.09,1.15 - 3.81)和 (1.66,1.36 - 2.01)增加,而 (0.84,0.76 - 0.92)和 (0.82,0.76 - 0.89)显示出保护作用。值得注意的是, 、 和 在各严重程度分层中构成一致的风险因素,而 和 显示出跨阶段的保护作用。 产生特异性降低了住院风险,而 显示出危重症风险显著升高,这与典型的益生菌关联不同。这项MR研究的荟萃分析为肠道微生物群对新冠病毒肺炎结局的严重程度特异性因果效应提供了有力证据。所确定的微生物分类群和代谢物为临床风险分层提供了潜在的生物标志物,并为新型辅助治疗策略提供了靶点。