Jalaluddin Mohammad, Ramanna Pavithra K, Jasthi Veeriah C, Nedumgottil Binoy M, Bhat Murali Patla S, Patel Priya
Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences (KIDS), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, Phone: +91 9338131843, e-mail:
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2025 May 1;26(5):500-503. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3801.
The current investigation aimed to assess oral implant stability with/without platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) using resonance frequency analysis (RFA).
A total of 40 patients, aged 25-55 years, were chosen and their eligibility was examined. There were two groups with 20 patients in each group, Group A: Implant with PRF placement and group B: Implant without PRF placement. Thirty minutes before surgery, the test group's PRF preparation started. After blood collection, for 10 minutes, the tube was centrifuged at 400 at 3,000 revolutions per minute. The PRF was separated and placed in the surgical site for the test group. The implant shoulder up to the interproximal alveolar bone crest served as the reference point. The distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone-implant contact was measured using radiography in millimeters to assess the mean marginal bone level changes. All data was collected at baseline, three months, and six months. The stability of the implant was evaluated using RFA. Data was collected and statistically analyzed.
In an implant with PRF group mean marginal bone level was 12.88 ± 0.28 at baseline, reduced to 9.42 ± 0.12 at 3 months and 8.74 ± 0.06 at the sixth month. In an implant without PRF group mean marginal bone level was 13.02 ± 0.09 at baseline, reduced to 10.96 ± 0.18 at 3 months and 9.44 ± 0.04 at the sixth month. A statistical difference was found within both groups. The mean difference in implant stability was 88.6 ± 1.58 in the implant with PRF group and 72.8 ± 1.20 in the implant without PRF at the end of the sixth month. A statistically significant difference between the groups was noticed.
In conclusion, the current study showed that the use of PRF during implant surgery improved implant stability compared to the group without PRF.
Clinicians and academics have shifted their focus to making treatment quicker and more comfortable for patients due to the rising success rates of dental implants. A natural concentration of autologous growth factors may be obtained by the preparation of PRF, a straightforward, inexpensive, and minimally invasive technique that is often utilized in several medical specialties to speed up the healing of both soft and hard tissues. How to cite this article: Jalaluddin M, Ramanna PK, Jasthi VC, . Comparative Assessment of the Oral Implant Stability with/without Platelet-rich Fibrin: An Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(5):500-503.
本研究旨在通过共振频率分析（RFA）评估使用/不使用富血小板纤维蛋白（PRF）时口腔种植体的稳定性。
共选取40例年龄在25 - 55岁的患者，并检查其入选资格。分为两组，每组20例患者，A组：植入PRF；B组：未植入PRF。手术前30分钟开始制备试验组的PRF。采血后，将试管以每分钟3000转的速度离心400力10分钟。分离出PRF并放置于试验组的手术部位。以种植体肩部至邻面牙槽嵴顶作为参考点。使用X线摄影测量种植体肩部与首次可见的骨 - 种植体接触点之间的距离（以毫米为单位），以评估平均边缘骨水平变化。所有数据在基线、3个月和6个月时收集。使用RFA评估种植体的稳定性。收集数据并进行统计学分析。
植入PRF组的种植体平均边缘骨水平在基线时为12.88±0.28，3个月时降至9.42±0.12，6个月时降至8.74±0.06。未植入PRF组的种植体平均边缘骨水平在基线时为13.02±0.09，3个月时降至10.96±0.18，6个月时降至9.44±0.04。两组内均发现有统计学差异。在第6个月末，植入PRF组种植体稳定性的平均差异为88.6±1.58，未植入PRF组为72.8±1.20。两组之间存在统计学显著差异。
总之，本研究表明与未使用PRF的组相比，种植手术中使用PRF可提高种植体稳定性。
由于牙种植成功率不断提高，临床医生和学者已将重点转向使患者的治疗更快且更舒适。通过制备PRF可获得天然浓度的自体生长因子，这是一种简单、廉价且微创的技术，常用于多个医学专业以加速软硬组织的愈合。如何引用本文：Jalaluddin M，Ramanna PK，Jasthi VC，. 使用/不使用富血小板纤维蛋白的口腔种植体稳定性的比较评估：一项研究。《当代牙科实践杂志》2025；26(5):500 - 503。
