Suppr超能文献

医疗保健专业人员与慢性下腰痛患者之间的认知差距:英国当前基层医疗管理实践的在线调查

Perception gaps between healthcare professionals and people with CLBP: an online survey of current primary care management practices in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Zhou Tianyu

机构信息

School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.

MSk Lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2553216. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2553216. Epub 2025 Sep 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined differences in perspectives and perceptual gaps in the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) between healthcare professionals-general practitioners (GPs) and physiotherapists-and people with CLBP in United Kingdom primary care.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was completed by 32 GPs, 53 physiotherapists, and 138 people with CLBP. Closed- and open-ended questions assessed management strategies, perceived effectiveness, treatment goals, and alignment of perspectives. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative responses through content analysis.

RESULTS

GPs most frequently recommended exercise (87.5%), analgesics (84.4%), and referral to physiotherapy (62.5%). Physiotherapists emphasised exercise (98%), pain education (73.6%), and active lifestyle advice (47.2%). Both groups prioritised active management, while patients most often reported analgesic use (44.9%) and passive treatments such as manual therapy (12.3%) and electrotherapy (12.3%). Regarding treatment goals, GPs and physiotherapists prioritised functional improvement, pain reduction, mental health, daily activity, and quality of life (all ≥80%), reflecting a biopsychosocial approach. Patients, however, focused mainly on pain relief (52.2%) and return to activity (33.3%), underscoring expectation gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

While GPs and physiotherapists generally follow guideline-recommended, active strategies for CLBP, substantial differences remain between clinician recommendations and patient-reported practices and goals. Addressing these gaps requires enhanced communication, shared decision-making, and more person-centred care.

摘要

背景

本研究调查了英国初级医疗保健中,医疗保健专业人员(全科医生和物理治疗师)与慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者在CLBP管理方面的观点差异和认知差距。

方法

32名全科医生、53名物理治疗师和138名CLBP患者完成了一项横断面在线调查。封闭式和开放式问题评估了管理策略、感知疗效、治疗目标以及观点的一致性。对定量数据进行描述性分析,对定性回答进行内容分析。

结果

全科医生最常推荐的是运动(87.5%)、镇痛药(84.4%)和转介至物理治疗(62.5%)。物理治疗师强调运动(98%)、疼痛教育(73.6%)和积极生活方式建议(47.2%)。两组都将积极管理作为优先事项,而患者最常报告使用镇痛药(44.9%)以及手动治疗(12.3%)和电疗(12.3%)等被动治疗方法。关于治疗目标,全科医生和物理治疗师将功能改善、疼痛减轻、心理健康、日常活动和生活质量列为优先事项(均≥80%),体现了生物心理社会方法。然而,患者主要关注疼痛缓解(52.2%)和恢复活动(33.3%),凸显了期望差距。

结论

虽然全科医生和物理治疗师通常遵循指南推荐的CLBP积极管理策略,但临床医生的建议与患者报告的做法和目标之间仍存在显著差异。弥合这些差距需要加强沟通、共同决策以及更以人为本的护理。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Beyond biopsychosocial: The keystone mechanism theory of pain.超越生物心理社会模型:疼痛的关键机制理论
Brain Behav Immun. 2023 Nov;114:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.08.018. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
9
The advice given by physiotherapists to people with back pain in primary care.在初级保健中,物理治疗师给背痛患者的建议。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Oct;55:102403. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102403. Epub 2021 May 29.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验