• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米拉贝隆治疗伴膀胱刺激征的壁内段输尿管结石:一项前瞻性研究。

Mirabegron for intramural ureteral stones with vesical irritability: a prospective study.

作者信息

Dai Mengjun, She Yuhang, Wang Hao

机构信息

1 Department of Anesthesia Operating Room, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing City, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing City, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 2;16:1639032. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1639032. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1639032
PMID:40963679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12436088/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of mirabegron in patients with intramural ureteral stones (6-10 mm).

METHODS

We prospectively randomized 92 patients with intramural ureteral stones into two groups. Patients in the mirabegron group received 50 mg of mirabegron daily, while those in the tamsulosin group received 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily. All patients were required to use the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) to assess the urinary urgency and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain. Patients were followed until stone expulsion or for up to 4 weeks.

RESULTS

All of 80 patients were included in this study. 41 patients in mirabegron group and 39 patients in tamsulosin group as control. The average expulsion time was shorter in mirabegron group than in tamsulosin group (8.4 ± 2.9 vs. 11.2 ± 3.1 days, < 0.0001). The stone expulsion rate (SER) was higher in mirabegron group than in tamsulosin group on 1 and 2 weeks (36.6% vs. 15.4%, = 0.031 and 75.6% vs. 43.6%, = 0.004). However, the SER on 4 weeks had no statistical difference between two groups ( > 0.05). Post-treatment VAS and USS scores were lower in mirabegron group than tamsulosin group ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Mirabegron not only accelerates the expulsion of intramural ureteral stones but also relieves renal colic and vesical irritability.

摘要

目的

评估米拉贝隆对壁内输尿管结石(6 - 10毫米)患者的疗效。

方法

我们将92例壁内输尿管结石患者前瞻性随机分为两组。米拉贝隆组患者每日服用50毫克米拉贝隆,坦索罗辛组患者每日服用0.4毫克坦索罗辛。所有患者均需使用尿意量表(USS)评估尿急情况,并使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛情况。对患者进行随访直至结石排出或长达4周。

结果

本研究共纳入80例患者。米拉贝隆组41例患者,坦索罗辛组39例患者作为对照。米拉贝隆组的平均排石时间短于坦索罗辛组(8.4 ± 2.9天对11.2 ± 3.1天,< 0.0001)。在第1周和第2周,米拉贝隆组的结石排出率(SER)高于坦索罗辛组(36.6%对15.4%,P = 0.031;75.6%对43.6%,P = 0.004)。然而,两组在第4周的SER无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。米拉贝隆组治疗后的VAS和USS评分低于坦索罗辛组(P < 0.05)。

结论

米拉贝隆不仅能加速壁内输尿管结石的排出,还能缓解肾绞痛和膀胱刺激症状。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2184/12436088/3c432ad11f1c/fphar-16-1639032-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2184/12436088/3c432ad11f1c/fphar-16-1639032-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2184/12436088/3c432ad11f1c/fphar-16-1639032-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Mirabegron for intramural ureteral stones with vesical irritability: a prospective study.米拉贝隆治疗伴膀胱刺激征的壁内段输尿管结石:一项前瞻性研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 2;16:1639032. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1639032. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Alfuzosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿夫唑嗪作为输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134589. eCollection 2015.
3
Efficacy and safety of silodosin in the medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.西洛多辛在远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;81(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12737. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones.α受体阻滞剂作为输尿管结石的药物排石疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 2(4):CD008509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008509.pub2.
5
Comparative study between Tamsulosin, Silodosin and Tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteral stones.坦索罗辛、西洛多辛和他达拉非在治疗下尿路结石中的医学排石治疗的比较研究。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2023 Feb 22;95(1):10849. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2023.10849.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Naftopidil in the Medical Expulsion Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.萘哌地尔在远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):427-437. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0486. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
7
Tamsulosin for ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a randomized controlled trial.坦索罗辛治疗输尿管结石:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Urol Int. 2012;89(1):107-15. doi: 10.1159/000338909. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
8
L-arginine role for stone lower ureter: A randomized controlled trial.L-精氨酸对输尿管下段结石的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jun 11;53(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01768-3.
9
Tamsulosin as adjunctive treatment after shockwave lithotripsy in patients with upper urinary tract stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.坦索罗辛在上尿路结石患者冲击波碎石术后的辅助治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2010 Dec;44(6):425-32. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2010.523014.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron and Tamsulosin Combination Therapy Compared to Tamsulosin Monotherapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Clinical Trial.米拉贝隆与坦索罗辛联合治疗与坦索罗辛单药治疗相比用于良性前列腺增生所致下尿路症状的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、III期临床试验的结果
World J Mens Health. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.250085.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing silodosin and mirabegron as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculus: a prospective, randomised study.比较西洛多辛和米拉贝隆作为远端输尿管结石药物排石疗法的效果:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(2):286-290. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.182. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
2
Comparison of mirabegron and vibegron for clinical efficacy and safety in female patients with overactive bladder: a multicenter prospective randomized crossover trial.米拉贝隆与维贝隆治疗女性膀胱过度活动症的临床疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心前瞻性随机交叉试验。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 2;42(1):113. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04799-4.
3
Kidney Stone Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management: Core Curriculum 2023.
《肾结石病理生理学、评估和管理:2023 年核心课程》。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Nov;82(5):617-634. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.03.017. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
Efficacy of Vibegron and Mirabegron for Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison.Vibegron 和米拉贝隆治疗膀胱过度活动症的疗效:系统文献回顾和间接治疗比较。
Adv Ther. 2021 Nov;38(11):5452-5464. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01902-8. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
5
Determining the true burden of kidney stone disease.确定肾结石疾病的真实负担。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Dec;16(12):736-746. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-0320-7. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
Efficacy of silodosin or mirabegron in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized-controlled study.索利那新或米拉贝隆在输尿管结石医学排石治疗中的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 May;52(5):835-840. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02368-y. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
7
Medical Expulsive Therapy for Urinary Stones: Future Trends and Knowledge Gaps.医学排石疗法治疗尿路结石:未来趋势和知识空白。
Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):658-666. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.053. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
8
Adjunction of tamsulosin or mirabegron before semi-rigid ureterolithotripsy improves outcomes: prospective, randomized single-blind study.在半硬性输尿管镜碎石术之前加用坦索罗辛或米拉贝隆可改善疗效:前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Jun;51(6):931-936. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02142-0. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
Efficacy of mirabegron in medical expulsive therapy.米拉贝隆在药物排石疗法中的疗效。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Jun;47(3):303-307. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1075-5. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
10
Comparing the Efficacy of Tolterodine and Gabapentin Versus Placebo in Catheter Related Bladder Discomfort After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.托特罗定和加巴喷丁与安慰剂治疗经皮肾镜取石术后导管相关膀胱不适的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验
J Endourol. 2018 Feb;32(2):168-174. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0563. Epub 2018 Jan 26.