Brüller W, Fischer M, Tritthart W
Arzneimittelforschung. 1985;35(12):1854-9.
Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a new anhydrous sustained release theophylline preparation (GTR-80 300 mg, Theospirex) were compared to those of an orally administered marketed solution containing theophylline-ethylenediamine and to a sustained release preparation containing theophylline-ethylene-diamine (control preparation). Eight healthy volunteers received in a cross-over design GTR-80 (300 mg) and the control preparation (350 mg) at single doses - nine volunteers received the solution in a quantity corresponding to 200 mg anhydrous theophylline. During the observation period 0-24 h the relative bioavailability of GTR-80 (calculated on the basis of equivalent doses) was 135% versus control preparation and 80% versus solution. During the observation period 0-36 h, the comparison of the dose-adjusted areas under the serum level-time curves of GTR-80 showed 116% versus control preparation and 91.5% versus solution. Statistical evaluation revealed significant differences in the observation period 0-24 h. Extrapolation of the solution's serum values indicated a shift towards the non-significant range for the observation period 0-36 h. The protracted action of GTR-80 300 mg could be demonstrated by the significantly longer period elapsing before reaching serum peaks compared to that after dosing of the fast absorbing solution. The lower interindividual deviations with respect to the parameters of Cmax and AUC after administration of GTR-80 as against the control preparation should be of interest in therapeutical use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
将一种新型无水缓释茶碱制剂(GTR - 80 300毫克,Theospirex)的药代动力学和生物利用度与口服市售的含氨茶碱 - 乙二胺溶液以及含茶碱 - 乙二胺的缓释制剂(对照制剂)进行了比较。8名健康志愿者采用交叉设计,单次服用GTR - 80(300毫克)和对照制剂(350毫克);9名志愿者服用相当于200毫克无水茶碱量的溶液。在0 - 24小时观察期内,GTR - 80的相对生物利用度(基于等效剂量计算)与对照制剂相比为135%,与溶液相比为80%。在0 - 36小时观察期内,GTR - 80血清水平 - 时间曲线下剂量调整面积与对照制剂相比为116%,与溶液相比为91.5%。统计评估显示在0 - 24小时观察期内存在显著差异。溶液血清值的外推表明在0 - 36小时观察期内趋向于无显著差异范围。与快速吸收溶液给药后相比,服用GTR - 80 300毫克后达到血清峰值所需时间显著更长,这证明了其作用时间延长。与对照制剂相比,服用GTR - 80后Cmax和AUC参数的个体间偏差较低,这在治疗应用中应引起关注。(摘要截断于250字)