Dereschuk Kypros J, Chen Patrick S, Espiridion Eduardo D
Psychiatry, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 18;17(8):e90386. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90386. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Introduction Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental condition that can persist from childhood into adulthood. Stimulant medications such as methylphenidate and amphetamine derivatives are the mainstay of treatment, yet their potential immunomodulatory effects remain unclear. While most upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are benign and self-limiting, some may result in healthcare visits and lost productivity. Proposed mechanisms linking stimulant use to infection risk include sympathetic nervous system activation, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis modulation, stimulant-induced insomnia, and reduced salivary flow - all of which may impair mucosal immunity. This study aimed to evaluate whether stimulant medication use in ADHD is associated with increased risk of URTIs using a large real-world dataset. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX research network, which aggregates de-identified electronic health records from 149 healthcare organizations worldwide (>170 million patients). ADHD patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes F90.0-F90.2. Two cohorts were defined: ADHD patients without stimulant prescriptions (control; n = 1,798,001) and ADHD patients prescribed stimulants (medication cohort; n = 1,099,756; amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil, or dexmethylphenidate). We did not include antidepressants and antipsychotics in the cohorts or in their comparison. The outcome was a diagnosis of URTI (ICD-10 J00-J06). Risk estimates, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed within TriNetX, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results A total of 2,897,757 ADHD patients were included (mean age 21.2 ± 15 years; 42.1% female). URTI incidence was higher in the medication cohort (31.2%, n = 343,385) than in controls (28.5%, n = 512,849). Stimulant exposure was associated with increased URTI risk: risk difference 0.027 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.026-0.028; p < 0.001), risk ratio 1.095 (95% CI: 1.091-1.099), and odds ratio 1.138 (95% CI: 1.132-1.144). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly lower URTI-free survival in medicated patients (log-rank χ² = 2285.0; p < 0.001). The hazard ratio for URTI in the medicated cohort was 1.111 (95% CI: 1.106-1.116; p < 0.001). Median survival without URTI was 3757 days in controls versus 3176 days in the medicated group. Discussion Stimulant-treated ADHD patients exhibited an 11% higher relative risk of URTI compared with unmedicated patients. Some possible mechanisms may include immune suppression via catecholamine-mediated shifts in cytokine profiles, sleep disruption leading to impaired host defenses, and medication-induced xerostomia, reducing mucosal protection. Our findings align with prior clinical and epidemiologic studies reporting higher infection rates in ADHD populations, although prior results have been mixed. Conclusion In this large multi-institutional analysis, stimulant use in ADHD was moderately associated with increased URTI risk. These findings warrant consideration in risk-benefit discussions for ADHD treatment, particularly for patients with frequent infections or compromised immunity. Future prospective studies should explore dose-response effects, adherence, and biologic mediators to clarify causality and guide preventive strategies.
引言
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种常见的神经发育疾病,可从儿童期持续至成年期。哌甲酯和苯丙胺衍生物等兴奋剂药物是主要治疗手段,但其潜在的免疫调节作用仍不明确。虽然大多数上呼吸道感染(URTI)是良性且自限性的,但有些可能导致就医和生产力下降。将兴奋剂使用与感染风险联系起来的推测机制包括交感神经系统激活、下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺轴调节、兴奋剂引起的失眠以及唾液分泌减少——所有这些都可能损害黏膜免疫。本研究旨在使用大型真实世界数据集评估ADHD患者使用兴奋剂药物是否与URTI风险增加相关。
方法
我们使用TriNetX研究网络进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该网络汇总了来自全球149个医疗机构(超过1.7亿患者)的去识别化电子健康记录。通过国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)编码F90.0 - F90.2识别ADHD患者。定义了两个队列:未开具兴奋剂处方的ADHD患者(对照组;n = 1,798,001)和开具兴奋剂的ADHD患者(用药队列;n = 1,099,756;苯丙胺、右旋苯丙胺、赖右苯丙胺、哌甲酯、莫达非尼或右哌甲酯)。我们在队列及其比较中未包括抗抑郁药和抗精神病药。结局是URTI诊断(ICD - 10 J00 - J06)。在TriNetX内进行风险估计、Kaplan - Meier生存分析、对数秩检验和Cox比例风险建模,显著性设定为p < 0.05。
结果
共纳入2,897,757例ADHD患者(平均年龄21.2±15岁;42.1%为女性)。用药队列的URTI发病率(31.2%,n = 343,385)高于对照组(28.5%,n = 512,849)。兴奋剂暴露与URTI风险增加相关:风险差异0.027(95%置信区间(CI):0.026 - 0.028;p < 0.001),风险比1.095(95% CI:1.091 - 1.099),比值比1.138(95% CI:1.132 - 1.144)。Kaplan - Meier分析显示用药患者的无URTI生存率显著更低(对数秩χ² = 2285.0;p < 0.001)。用药队列中URTI的风险比为1.111(95% CI:1.106 - 1.116;p < 0.001)。对照组无URTI的中位生存期为3757天,用药组为3176天。
讨论
与未用药患者相比,接受兴奋剂治疗的ADHD患者出现URTI的相对风险高11%。一些可能的机制可能包括通过儿茶酚胺介导的细胞因子谱变化导致的免疫抑制、睡眠中断导致宿主防御受损以及药物引起的口干,从而降低黏膜保护。我们的发现与先前报告ADHD人群感染率较高的临床和流行病学研究一致,尽管先前的结果不一。
结论
在这项大型多机构分析中,ADHD患者使用兴奋剂与URTI风险适度增加相关。这些发现值得在ADHD治疗的风险 - 效益讨论中考虑,特别是对于频繁感染或免疫力受损的患者。未来的前瞻性研究应探索剂量 - 反应效应、依从性和生物介质,以阐明因果关系并指导预防策略。