Department of Cognitive Neuroscience (204), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 9100 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Paediatric Psychopharmacology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
CNS Drugs. 2017 Mar;31(3):199-215. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0410-7.
Many children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are treated with stimulant and non-stimulant medication. ADHD medication may be associated with cardiovascular effects. It is important to identify whether mean group effects translate into clinically relevant increases for some individual patients, and/or increase the risk for serious cardiovascular adverse events such as stroke or sudden death.
To evaluate potential cardiovascular effects of these treatments, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of methylphenidate (MPH), amphetamines (AMP), and atomoxetine (ATX) on diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP, SBP) and heart rate (HR) in children and adolescents with ADHD.
We conducted systematic searches in electronic databases (PsychINFO, EMBASE and Medline) to identify published trials which involved individuals who were (i) diagnosed with ADHD and were aged between 0-18 years; (ii) treated with MPH, AMP or ATX and (iii) had their DBP and SBP and/or HR measured at baseline (pre) and the endpoint (post) of the study treatment. Studies with an open-label design or a double-blind randomised control design of any duration were included. Statistical analysis involved calculating differences between pre- and post-treatment measurements for the various cardiovascular parameters divided by the pooled standard deviation. Further, we assessed the percentage of clinically relevant increased BP or HR, or documented arrhythmias.
Eighteen clinical trials met the inclusion criteria (10 for MPH, 5 for AMP, and 7 for ATX) with data from 5837 participants (80.7% boys) and average duration of 28.7 weeks (range 4-96 weeks). All three medications were associated with a small, but statistically significant pre-post increase of SBP (MPH: standard mean difference [SMD] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.42, p < 0.01; AMP: SMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.15, p < 0.01; ATX: SMD 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.27, p = 0.01). MPH did not have a pre-post effect on DBP and HR. AMP treatment was associated with a small but statistically significant pre-post increase of DBP (SMD 0.16, CI 0.03-0.29, p = 0.02), as was ATX treatment (SMD 0.22, CI 0.10-0.34, p < 0.01). AMP and ATX were associated with a small to medium statistically significant pre-post increase of HR (AMP: SMD 0.37, CI 0.13-0.60, p < 0.01; ATX: SMD 0.43, CI 0.26-0.60, p < 0.01). The head-to-head comparison of the three medications did not reveal significant differences. Sensitivity analyses revealed that AMP studies of <18 weeks reported higher effect sizes on DBP compared with longer duration studies (F(1) = 19.55, p = 0.05). Further, MPH studies published before 2007 reported higher effect sizes on SBP than studies after 2007 (F(1) = 5.346, p = 0.05). There was no effect of the following moderators: type of medication, doses, sample size, age, gender, type of ADHD, comorbidity or dropout rate. Participants on medication reported 737 (12.6%) other cardiovascular effects. Notably, 2% of patients discontinued their medication treatment due to any cardiovascular effect. However, in the majority of patients, the cardiovascular effects resolved spontaneously, medication doses were changed or the effects were not considered clinically relevant. There were no statistically significant differences between the medication treatments in terms of the severity of cardiovascular effects.
Statistically significant pre-post increases of SBP, DBP and HR were associated with AMP and ATX treatment in children and adolescents with ADHD, while MPH treatment had a statistically significant effect only on SBP in these patients. These increases may be clinically significant for a significant minority of individuals that experience larger increases. Since increased BP and HR in general are considered risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality during adult life, paediatric patients using ADHD medication should be monitored closely and regularly for HR and BP.
许多患有注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童和青少年接受兴奋剂和非兴奋剂药物治疗。ADHD 药物可能与心血管效应有关。重要的是要确定平均组效应是否会转化为某些个体患者的临床相关增加,以及/或者是否会增加严重心血管不良事件(如中风或猝死)的风险。
为了评估这些治疗方法的潜在心血管效应,我们对哌甲酯(MPH)、苯丙胺(AMP)和阿托西汀(ATX)对儿童和青少年 ADHD 患者的舒张压(DBP)、收缩压(SBP)和心率(HR)的影响进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们在电子数据库(心理信息、EMBASE 和 Medline)中进行了系统搜索,以确定涉及以下人群的已发表试验:(i)被诊断为 ADHD,年龄在 0-18 岁之间;(ii)接受 MPH、AMP 或 ATX 治疗;(iii)在研究治疗的基线(前)和终点(后)测量了 DBP 和 SBP 和/或 HR。纳入了具有开放标签设计或任何持续时间的双盲随机对照设计的研究。统计分析包括计算各种心血管参数的治疗前后测量值之间的差异,除以合并标准差。此外,我们评估了血压或心率的临床相关增加百分比,或记录的心律失常。
18 项临床试验符合纳入标准(10 项用于 MPH,5 项用于 AMP,7 项用于 ATX),共纳入 5837 名参与者(80.7%为男孩),平均治疗时间为 28.7 周(4-96 周)。三种药物均与 SBP 的小但具有统计学意义的治疗前后增加相关(MPH:标准均数差值[SMD]0.25,95%置信区间[CI]0.08-0.42,p<0.01;AMP:SMD 0.09,95%CI0.03-0.15,p<0.01;ATX:SMD 0.16,95%CI0.04-0.27,p=0.01)。MPH 对 DBP 和 HR 没有治疗前后的影响。AMP 治疗与 DBP 的小但具有统计学意义的治疗前后增加相关(SMD 0.16,CI0.03-0.29,p=0.02),ATX 治疗也有相关(SMD 0.22,CI0.10-0.34,p<0.01)。AMP 和 ATX 与 HR 的小到中度统计学显著治疗前后增加相关(AMP:SMD 0.37,CI0.13-0.60,p<0.01;ATX:SMD 0.43,CI0.26-0.60,p<0.01)。三种药物的头对头比较没有发现统计学显著差异。敏感性分析显示,18 周以下的 AMP 研究报告的 DBP 效应大小高于较长持续时间的研究(F(1)=19.55,p=0.05)。此外,2007 年以前发表的 MPH 研究报告的 SBP 效应大小高于 2007 年以后发表的研究(F(1)=5.346,p=0.05)。没有 moderator 的以下效果:药物类型、剂量、样本量、年龄、性别、ADHD 类型、合并症或辍学率。服用药物的参与者报告了 737 次(12.6%)其他心血管影响。值得注意的是,2%的患者因任何心血管效应而停止药物治疗。然而,在大多数患者中,心血管效应会自行缓解,药物剂量会改变,或者效应不会被认为具有临床相关性。在心血管效应的严重程度方面,药物治疗之间没有统计学显著差异。
AMP 和 ATX 治疗与儿童和青少年 ADHD 患者的 SBP、DBP 和 HR 的统计学显著治疗前后增加相关,而 MPH 治疗在这些患者中仅对 SBP 具有统计学显著影响。对于经历更大增加的少数个体来说,这些增加可能具有临床意义。由于一般来说,BP 和 HR 的增加被认为是成年人心血管发病率和死亡率的危险因素,因此使用 ADHD 药物的儿科患者应密切监测 HR 和 BP,并定期监测。