• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扰乱药品成本:成本加成定价在降低医疗保险高血压治疗支出中的作用。

Disrupting Drug Costs: The Role of Cost-Plus Pricing in Reducing Medicare Spending on Hypertension Treatments.

作者信息

Duncan Jacob, Tran Andrew V, Witt Ryan, Elfar Annes, Rashid Matthew, Vassar Matt

机构信息

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 19:e70045. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.70045.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.70045
PMID:40971147
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess potential Medicare cost savings if Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) pricing were applied to antihypertensive medications.

STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing Medicare Part D spending with MCCPDC pricing for selected antihypertensive drugs.

DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE

Eighty-seven antihypertensive medications were compared between Medicare Part D and MCCPDC. Volume-adjusted expenditure estimates were calculated under three scenarios: (1) applying MCCPDC prices to all medications, (2) applying MCCPDC prices only to drugs priced lower than Medicare, and (3) applying MCCPDC prices to guideline-recommended first-line therapies.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

In 2022, Medicare spent $4.9 billion on the included medications. Of these, 39 of the 30-count and 58 of the 90-count medications showed cost savings under MCCPDC pricing. Estimated savings totaled $670.1 million (30-count) and $1.4 billion (90-count). Among 47 first-line agents, MCCPDC pricing produced estimated savings of $222.6 million (30-count) and $584.1 million (90-count). The average 90-count price reduction was 23.2% overall and 21.1% among first-line therapies, with several agents showing substantial price advantages.

CONCLUSION

Adopting MCCPDC pricing could reduce Medicare costs for antihypertensive drugs, especially through 90-count supplies and first-line therapies. Targeted implementation-focusing on medications with clear cost and clinical advantages-may yield meaningful savings. These results support broader policy efforts to incorporate transparent, value-based drug pricing models into Medicare.

摘要

目的

评估如果将马克·库班成本加成制药公司(MCCPDC)的定价应用于抗高血压药物,医疗保险可能节省的成本。

研究背景与设计

我们进行了一项横断面分析,比较医疗保险D部分(Medicare Part D)对选定抗高血压药物的支出与MCCPDC的定价。

数据来源与分析样本

比较了医疗保险D部分和MCCPDC的87种抗高血压药物。在三种情况下计算了按体积调整的支出估计数:(1)将MCCPDC价格应用于所有药物;(2)仅将MCCPDC价格应用于价格低于医疗保险的药物;(3)将MCCPDC价格应用于指南推荐的一线治疗药物。

主要发现

2022年,医疗保险在纳入的药物上花费了49亿美元。其中,30片装的药物中有39种、90片装的药物中有58种在MCCPDC定价下显示出成本节省。估计节省总额为6.701亿美元(30片装)和14亿美元(90片装)。在47种一线药物中,MCCPDC定价估计节省了2.226亿美元(30片装)和5.841亿美元(90片装)。90片装药物的平均降价幅度总体为23.2%,一线治疗药物为21.1%,有几种药物显示出显著的价格优势。

结论

采用MCCPDC定价可以降低医疗保险用于抗高血压药物的成本,特别是通过90片装供应和一线治疗药物。有针对性地实施——关注具有明显成本和临床优势的药物——可能会产生可观的节省。这些结果支持更广泛的政策努力,将透明的、基于价值的药品定价模式纳入医疗保险。

相似文献

1
Disrupting Drug Costs: The Role of Cost-Plus Pricing in Reducing Medicare Spending on Hypertension Treatments.扰乱药品成本:成本加成定价在降低医疗保险高血压治疗支出中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 19:e70045. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.70045.
2
Medicare Savings for Seizure Drugs by Adopting the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company Model.通过采用马克·库班成本加成制药公司模式节省医疗保险用于癫痫药物的开支。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Jun 18;17:447-453. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S516583. eCollection 2025.
3
Availability and Pricing of Drugs Prescribed by Otolaryngologists Through a Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacy: Medicare Savings Implications.耳鼻喉科医生通过直接面向消费者的药房开具的药物的可及性与定价:对医疗保险节省费用的影响
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan;172(1):360-365. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1023. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
4
Potential Cost-Saving Model Utilizing Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company for Purchasing Common Otolaryngology Medications.利用马克·库班成本加成制药公司采购常见耳鼻喉科药物的潜在成本节约模型。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Feb;172(2):693-696. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1058. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
5
Projected Savings for Generic Oncology Drugs Purchased via Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company Versus in Medicare.通过马克·库班成本加成药品公司购买的仿制药与医疗保险相比的预计节省。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 10;41(29):4664-4668. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00079. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
6
Drug Pricing Stewardship from Mark Cuban's Cost Plus Generic Drug Program.从马克·库班的成本加成仿制药计划看药品定价管理
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Nov;42(11):1279-1286. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01426-3. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
7
Oncology drug pricing: potential Medicare savings on cancer-directed and supportive care medications through the Mark Cuban cost plus drug model.肿瘤药物定价:通过马克·库班成本加成药物模式,潜在的医疗保险在癌症靶向和支持性治疗药物方面的节省。
Oncologist. 2024 Jul 5;29(7):e918-e921. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae083.
8
Evaluation of Potential Urologic Prescription Drug Savings With Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company.评估与马克·库班成本加成药品公司合作可能节省的泌尿科处方药费用。
Urol Pract. 2024 Mar;11(2):276-282. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000510. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies.药品政策:参考定价、其他定价及采购政策的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 16;2014(10):CD005979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005979.pub2.