Duncan Jacob, Tran Andrew V, Witt Ryan, Elfar Annes, Rashid Matthew, Vassar Matt
Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 19:e70045. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.70045.
To assess potential Medicare cost savings if Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) pricing were applied to antihypertensive medications.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing Medicare Part D spending with MCCPDC pricing for selected antihypertensive drugs.
Eighty-seven antihypertensive medications were compared between Medicare Part D and MCCPDC. Volume-adjusted expenditure estimates were calculated under three scenarios: (1) applying MCCPDC prices to all medications, (2) applying MCCPDC prices only to drugs priced lower than Medicare, and (3) applying MCCPDC prices to guideline-recommended first-line therapies.
In 2022, Medicare spent $4.9 billion on the included medications. Of these, 39 of the 30-count and 58 of the 90-count medications showed cost savings under MCCPDC pricing. Estimated savings totaled $670.1 million (30-count) and $1.4 billion (90-count). Among 47 first-line agents, MCCPDC pricing produced estimated savings of $222.6 million (30-count) and $584.1 million (90-count). The average 90-count price reduction was 23.2% overall and 21.1% among first-line therapies, with several agents showing substantial price advantages.
Adopting MCCPDC pricing could reduce Medicare costs for antihypertensive drugs, especially through 90-count supplies and first-line therapies. Targeted implementation-focusing on medications with clear cost and clinical advantages-may yield meaningful savings. These results support broader policy efforts to incorporate transparent, value-based drug pricing models into Medicare.
评估如果将马克·库班成本加成制药公司(MCCPDC)的定价应用于抗高血压药物,医疗保险可能节省的成本。
我们进行了一项横断面分析,比较医疗保险D部分(Medicare Part D)对选定抗高血压药物的支出与MCCPDC的定价。
比较了医疗保险D部分和MCCPDC的87种抗高血压药物。在三种情况下计算了按体积调整的支出估计数:(1)将MCCPDC价格应用于所有药物;(2)仅将MCCPDC价格应用于价格低于医疗保险的药物;(3)将MCCPDC价格应用于指南推荐的一线治疗药物。
2022年,医疗保险在纳入的药物上花费了49亿美元。其中,30片装的药物中有39种、90片装的药物中有58种在MCCPDC定价下显示出成本节省。估计节省总额为6.701亿美元(30片装)和14亿美元(90片装)。在47种一线药物中,MCCPDC定价估计节省了2.226亿美元(30片装)和5.841亿美元(90片装)。90片装药物的平均降价幅度总体为23.2%,一线治疗药物为21.1%,有几种药物显示出显著的价格优势。
采用MCCPDC定价可以降低医疗保险用于抗高血压药物的成本,特别是通过90片装供应和一线治疗药物。有针对性地实施——关注具有明显成本和临床优势的药物——可能会产生可观的节省。这些结果支持更广泛的政策努力,将透明的、基于价值的药品定价模式纳入医疗保险。