Suppr超能文献

富血小板血浆和短暂电刺激对大鼠面神经神经缝合术后的影响

Effect of Platelet-rich Plasma and Brief Electrical Stimulation Following Facial Nerve Neurorrhaphy in a Rat Model.

作者信息

Sloychuk Janelle, Song Jin Soo, Zhu Lin Fu, Mendez Adrian, Querney Jillian, Côté David

机构信息

From the Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Sep 19;13(9):e7104. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007104. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With ongoing investigations to improve facial nerve recovery after injury, brief electrical stimulation (BES) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) application have become promising modalities. The usage of combined modalities has not yet been investigated. We aimed to evaluate differences in facial nerve regeneration between rats receiving BES (group 1) and rats receiving BES plus PRP (group 2) following transection and primary neurorrhaphy.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized animal study of 2 groups of 6 rats that underwent facial nerve transection and repair at the main trunk of the nerve. Both groups received BES on postoperative day 0 for 1 hour using an implantable stimulation device, with group 2 additionally receiving concurrent PRP. The primary measure of whisker amplitude was recorded from 2 to 8 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

At week 2, the average whisker amplitude for groups 1 and 2 was 6.5 and 2.0 degrees, respectively. At week 4, group 1 remained unchanged at 6.1 degrees, whereas group 2 improved to 10.1 degrees. By 6 weeks, average amplitudes were 8.2 and 14.0 degrees, respectively. By week 8, measures were 9.8 and 16.7 degrees, respectively. All results were statistically significant ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Application of BES and PRP following neurorrhaphy in a rat model yields a greater effect than BES alone in expediting facial nerve recovery.

摘要

背景

随着不断探索改善损伤后面神经恢复的方法,短暂电刺激(BES)和富血小板血浆(PRP)的应用已成为有前景的治疗方式。联合治疗方式的使用尚未得到研究。我们旨在评估在面神经横断和一期神经缝合术后,接受BES治疗的大鼠(第1组)和接受BES加PRP治疗的大鼠(第2组)之间面神经再生的差异。

方法

这是一项前瞻性随机动物研究,将2组各6只大鼠进行面神经横断并在神经主干处修复。两组均在术后第0天使用植入式刺激装置接受1小时的BES治疗,第2组还同时接受PRP治疗。术后2至8周记录触须幅度的主要测量值。

结果

在第2周时,第1组和第2组的平均触须幅度分别为6.5度和2.0度。在第4周时,第1组保持在6.1度不变,而第2组改善至10.1度。到第6周时,平均幅度分别为8.2度和14.0度。到第8周时,测量值分别为9.8度和16.7度。所有结果均具有统计学意义(<0.05)。

结论

在大鼠模型中,神经缝合术后应用BES和PRP比单独应用BES在加速面神经恢复方面产生更大的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b5/12448167/0c43757daf5d/gox-13-e7104-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验