Wang Kelie, Lei Bingxi
Department of Public Health, International College, Krirk University No. 3 Ram Inthra Road, Anu Sawari, Bang Khen, Bangkok 10220, Thailand.
Department of Orthopedics, Longgang Orthopedics Hospital of Shenzhen Shenzhen 518116, Guangdong, China.
Int J Burns Trauma. 2025 Aug 15;15(4):149-158. doi: 10.62347/YPKY1788. eCollection 2025.
To compare the clinical efficacy of transverse wrist crease perforator flap, the retrograde island flap of proper digital artery, the nutrient vascular fascial pedicled skin flap and the toes lateral free flap in the repair of finger soft tissue defects.
We reviewed the data of 106 patients with finger soft tissue defects who were admitted to Longgang District Orthopedic Hospital from January 2017 to December 2020. The patients were divided into four groups based on the treatment method: Group A (transverse wrist crease perforator flap repair group, N = 27), Group B (retrograde island flap of proper digital artery repair group, N = 23), Group C (nutrient vascular fascial pedicled skin flap repair group, N = 26) and Group D (toes lateral free flap repair group, N = 30). There was no significant difference in sex ratio, age, cause of injury, time of injury and area of defect between the four groups ( > 0.05). We compared the clinical efficacy (including total active motion, two-point discrimination, and cold intolerance), complications, and patient satisfaction.
There was no significant difference in wound recovery time among the four groups ( > 0.05), and the evaluation of skin flap recovery, including color, skin temperature, elasticity, and texture, was superior in Group D compared to Groups A, B, and C ( < 0.05). After one month of follow-up, the total active activity of the affected finger was lower in Group A and Group B than in Group C and Group D ( < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in S2-PD (two-point discrimination) among the groups ( > 0.05). The results of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS) scale after one month of follow-up were highest in Group B, followed by Group A, Group C, and then Group D. After six months and one year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the total active activity among the 4 groups ( > 0.05), and the scores of S2-PD and CISS decreased in each group ( < 0.01). Additionally, Group D exhibited better S2-PD and cold tolerance compared to the other three groups. All patients recovered well after surgery, with one case of vascular crisis in Group A, and no complications such as joint stiffness and postoperative infection were observed in any of the groups. The results indicated that group D had the highest satisfaction level ( < 0.01), with no significant difference among Groups A, B, and C.
The lateral free flap from the toe is an ideal method for repairing soft tissue defects of the finger, as it effectively restores the finger's shape and skin sensation with minimal complications and a concealed donor site.
比较腕横纹穿支皮瓣、指固有动脉逆行岛状皮瓣、营养血管筋膜蒂皮瓣及足趾外侧游离皮瓣修复手指软组织缺损的临床疗效。
回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年12月在龙岗区骨科医院收治的106例手指软组织缺损患者的资料。根据治疗方法将患者分为四组:A组(腕横纹穿支皮瓣修复组,N = 27)、B组(指固有动脉逆行岛状皮瓣修复组,N = 23)、C组(营养血管筋膜蒂皮瓣修复组,N = 26)和D组(足趾外侧游离皮瓣修复组,N = 30)。四组患者在性别比例、年龄、受伤原因、受伤时间及缺损面积方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。比较四组患者的临床疗效(包括总主动活动度、两点辨别觉及冷不耐受情况)、并发症及患者满意度。
四组患者伤口愈合时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);皮瓣恢复情况(包括颜色、皮温、弹性及质地)评估,D组优于A、B、C组(P < 0.05)。随访1个月时,A组和B组患指总主动活动度低于C组和D组(P < 0.05),各组间两点辨别觉差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。随访1个月时,冷不耐受症状严重程度(CISS)量表评分B组最高,其次为A组、C组,D组最低。随访6个月及1年时,4组患者患指总主动活动度比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),各组两点辨别觉及CISS评分均下降(P < 0.01)。此外,D组两点辨别觉及耐寒能力优于其他三组。所有患者术后恢复良好,A组发生1例血管危象,各组均未观察到关节僵硬及术后感染等并发症。结果显示,D组患者满意度最高(P < 0.01),A、B、C组间差异无统计学意义。
足趾外侧游离皮瓣是修复手指软组织缺损的理想方法,能有效恢复手指外形及皮肤感觉,并发症少,供区隐蔽。