• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Lalonde Report in historical perspective.从历史角度看拉隆德报告。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Aug;116(Suppl 1):1-7. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01032-6. Epub 2025 Sep 17.
2
"Insidious habits": The moral vision of the Lalonde Report in historical perspective.“潜移默化的习惯”:从历史角度看拉隆德报告的道德愿景
Can J Public Health. 2025 Aug;116(Suppl 1):15-21. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01063-z. Epub 2025 Sep 17.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
5
Fiscal federalism, Medicare, and the Lalonde report.财政联邦制、医疗保险与拉隆德报告。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Aug;116(Suppl 1):22-29. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01067-9. Epub 2025 Sep 17.
6
Shoulder Arthrogram肩关节造影
7
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
8
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
The theory of epidemiologic transition: the origins of a citation classic.流行病学转变理论:一篇经典被引文献的起源
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2010 Jul;65(3):287-326. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrp058. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
2
Reinventing public health: a new perspective on the health of Canadians and its international impact.重塑公共卫生:关于加拿大人健康及其国际影响的新视角。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Nov;61(11):955-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.046912.
3
An interpretation of the modern rise of population in Europe.对欧洲近代人口增长的一种阐释。
Popul Stud (Camb). 1972 Nov;26(3):345-82.
4
A retrospective on the "New Perspective".
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1982 Summer;7(2):325-44. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7-2-325.
5
The epidemiologic transition. A theory of the epidemiology of population change.流行病学转变。一种关于人口变化流行病学的理论。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1971 Oct;49(4):509-38.

从历史角度看拉隆德报告。

The Lalonde Report in historical perspective.

作者信息

Wright David

机构信息

McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2025 Aug;116(Suppl 1):1-7. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01032-6. Epub 2025 Sep 17.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-025-01032-6
PMID:40982192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12483005/
Abstract

It has been fifty years since the publication of A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians, a Green Paper circulated under the name of then Canadian federal Minister of Health and Welfare, the Honourable Marc Lalonde. Since its publication in 1974, the Lalonde Report, as it is commonly known, has been credited with launching a new era of health promotion, with a sustained focus on the social determinants of illness, disease, and disability. It was also surprisingly influential, breaking new ground for other international accords. At the same time, it has garnered a certain amount of criticism for its emphasis on individual responsibility for health outcomes, with some researchers sensing a neo-liberal agenda that occluded structural and environmental contributions to health inequities. At a time when Canadians are again debating the future of a health care system, this Introduction and the historical articles that follow aim to place the Lalonde Report in its political, social, and epidemiological context. It will provide a much-needed reflection on one of the most important public policy documents in contemporary Canadian history.

摘要

自以时任加拿大联邦卫生和福利部长尊敬的马克·拉隆德之名发布的绿皮书《加拿大人健康的新视角》出版至今已有五十年。自1974年出版以来,这份广为人知的《拉隆德报告》被认为开启了健康促进的新时代,持续关注疾病、病患和残疾的社会决定因素。它还具有惊人的影响力,为其他国际协定开辟了新领域。与此同时,它因强调个人对健康结果的责任而受到了一定程度的批评,一些研究人员感觉到其中存在新自由主义议程,掩盖了结构和环境对健康不平等的影响。在加拿大人再次就医疗保健系统的未来展开辩论之际,本引言及随后的历史文章旨在将《拉隆德报告》置于其政治、社会和流行病学背景中。它将对当代加拿大历史上最重要的公共政策文件之一进行亟需的反思。