Deventer Marie H, Stove Christophe P
Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Arch Toxicol. 2025 Sep 22. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04191-0.
The enactment of the generic ban on synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) in China in 2021 has significantly altered the international SCRA landscape, both in size and diversity. To circumvent the new legislation, covering 7 common SCRA scaffolds, manufacturers have employed various ban-evading strategies during the past 4 years, yielding numerous novel compounds with distinct properties and challenges. These strategies include introducing alternative core moieties, such as a oxoindolins ("OXIZIDs"), an oxopyridone (CH-FUBBMPDORA) and a 4-methyl benzoate (NMDMSB), as well as replacing the carboxamide linker with an acetamide (e.g., seen in ADB-FUBIATA). Additional approaches involve modifying conventional core structures by switching tail group positions (e.g., pyrazoles 5F-3,5-AB-PFUPPYCA and 3,5-ADB-4en-PFUPPYCA), or removing/adding substitutions (e.g., tail-less SCRAs like ADB-INACA and brominated SCRAs like ADB-5'Br-BUTINACA, respectively). Furthermore, a concerning 'do-it-yourself' synthesis approach has emerged, enabling users or intermediate suppliers to easily generate banned, potent SCRAs themselves from ban-evading tail-less precursors, thereby obtaining renewed access to previously scheduled and potentially dangerous compounds. In addition to the proliferation of structurally novel, unknown substances, new ways to market readily existing (highly potent) SCRAs, continue to complicate analytical detection and risk assessment. This review explores the ban-evading strategies that have been observed between mid-2021 and mid-2025, along with a discussion on strategies for detection, identification, metabolic profiling, and pharmacological characterization of the SCRAs that have emerged as a result of this ban. Additionally, for some compounds that have not been pharmacologically characterized in literature, the first published data are presented here.
2021年中国对合成大麻素受体激动剂(SCRAs)实施的通用禁令显著改变了国际SCRAs格局,无论是在规模还是多样性方面。为规避涵盖7种常见SCRAs骨架的新立法,制造商在过去4年中采用了各种规避禁令的策略,产生了许多具有独特性质和挑战的新型化合物。这些策略包括引入替代核心部分,如氧代吲哚啉(“OXIZIDs”)、氧代吡啶酮(CH-FUBBMPDORA)和4-甲基苯甲酸酯(NMDMSB),以及用乙酰胺取代羧酰胺连接基(如在ADB-FUBIATA中所见)。其他方法包括通过改变尾基位置(如吡唑5F-3,5-AB-PFUPPYCA和3,5-ADB-4en-PFUPPYCA)来修饰传统核心结构,或去除/添加取代基(如分别为无尾SCRAs如ADB-INACA和溴化SCRAs如ADB-5'Br-BUTINACA)。此外,出现了一种令人担忧的“自己动手”合成方法,使用户或中间供应商能够轻松地从规避禁令的无尾前体中自行合成被禁的强效SCRAs,从而重新获得对先前列入管制且可能危险的化合物的使用机会。除了结构新颖、未知物质的激增外,营销现成(高效)SCRAs的新方式继续使分析检测和风险评估复杂化。本综述探讨了2021年年中至2025年年中观察到的规避禁令策略,同时讨论了对因该禁令而出现的SCRAs进行检测、鉴定、代谢谱分析和药理特征分析的策略。此外,对于一些文献中尚未进行药理特征分析的化合物,此处展示了首次发表的数据。