Suppr超能文献

比较国防部医院与退伍军人事务部医院的创伤性脑损伤诊断、重症监护使用情况、住院时间和费用:军事相关脑损伤联盟研究的长期影响

Comparing Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnoses, Intensive Care Utilization, Length of Stay, and Costs Between Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs Hospitals: A Long-term Impact of Military-Relevant Brain Injury Consortium Study.

作者信息

Dismuke-Greer Clara E, Hinds Sidney, Del Negro Ariana, Garcia Carla, Cifu David X

机构信息

Health Economics Resource Center (HERC), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.

Uniform Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2025 Sep 1;190(Supplement_2):623-631. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaf290.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The paucity of health economics studies on traumatic brain injury (TBI) was highlighted in a recent report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Resource and cost modeling of acute hospitalizations for Service Members and Veterans (SMVs) can be used to inform Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) policy. The objective of this study was to compare intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, length of stay (LOS), and cost between DoD and VA facility hospitalizations for SMVs with a primary diagnosis of TBI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A unique database of ICU utilization, LOS, cost, and demographic variables was created from DoD and VA administrative databases for hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis code for TBI. Logistic and generalized linear models were used to estimate the adjusted differences in ICU utilization, LOS, and hospitalization cost between DoD and VA. All models were first adjusted for age, sex, and specific TBI diagnosis and then for clinical severity, as measured by the Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG).

RESULTS

SMVs hospitalized in DoD facilities were younger (median age 44 vs 73) and more than double were female (10.7% vs 3.5%), relative to VA facilities. The most frequent diagnosis for SMVs in both systems was traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness (LOC) (15.2% in DoD vs 47.8% in VA). DoD-treated SMVs had a much higher frequency of LOC diagnoses: traumatic subdural hemorrhage with LOC, unspecified duration (14.4% vs 8.1%), traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with LOC, unspecified duration (11.5% vs 4.1%), and concussion with LOC, unspecified duration (8.2% vs 1.1%). The most frequent MS-DRG in DoD facilities was concussion without complications/comorbidities or major complications/comorbidities (16.1%), and traumatic stupor and coma <1 hour with complications/comorbidities in VA facilities (27.5%). In diagnosis-adjusted models, the odds of ICU utilization were higher (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.47, 3.25), although LOS was lower (-3.67, 95% CI -5.43, -1.9) for SMVs treated in DoD facilities. Female SMVs had significantly lower diagnosis-adjusted LOS (-1.88, 95% CI -3.69, -.07). Unadjusted total hospitalization cost ($13,548 vs $23,084) was statistically significantly lower in DoD than VA facilities, but neither total nor daily marginal cost was statistically significantly different between the two systems in diagnosis-adjusted models. Similar results were found for MS-DRG adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

This study found that DoD facilities treat SMVs with TBI more intensively and rapidly than the VA. SMVs hospitalized in DoD facilities were younger, more likely to be female, and had diagnoses associated with LOC. In contrast, SMVs hospitalized in VA facilities had much higher rates of MS-DRGs with complications and comorbidities. Female SMVs were found to have lower LOS, consistent with civilian hospitalizations. These findings are limited in that Service Members and Veterans are distinct groups in terms of the mechanism of injury and non-hospitalization comorbidities, which are not accounted for in hospitalization data. Despite limitations, the findings suggest that the DoD and VA, as two government systems, have similar marginal costs for treating TBI. Future studies should include SMV cohorts with data on the mechanism of injury, military characteristics, and non-hospitalization comorbidities.

摘要

引言

美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院最近的一份报告强调了关于创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的卫生经济学研究匮乏。对现役军人和退伍军人(SMV)急性住院治疗的资源和成本建模可用于为国防部(DoD)和退伍军人事务部(VA)的政策提供参考。本研究的目的是比较初次诊断为TBI的SMV在国防部和退伍军人事务部设施住院期间的重症监护病房(ICU)利用率、住院时间(LOS)和成本。

材料与方法

从国防部和退伍军人事务部的行政数据库中创建了一个独特的数据库,其中包含ICU利用率、住院时间、成本和人口统计学变量,用于初次诊断编码为TBI的住院治疗。使用逻辑和广义线性模型来估计国防部和退伍军人事务部在ICU利用率、住院时间和住院成本方面的调整差异。所有模型首先针对年龄、性别和特定的TBI诊断进行调整,然后针对临床严重程度进行调整,临床严重程度通过医疗保险严重度诊断相关组(MS-DRG)来衡量。

结果

与退伍军人事务部设施相比,在国防部设施住院的SMV更年轻(中位年龄44岁对73岁),女性比例超过两倍(10.7%对3.5%)。两个系统中SMV最常见的诊断是无昏迷(LOC)的创伤性硬膜下血肿(国防部为15.2%,退伍军人事务部为47.8%)。国防部治疗的SMV中LOC诊断的频率要高得多:未指定持续时间的伴有LOC的创伤性硬膜下血肿(14.4%对8.1%)、未指定持续时间的伴有LOC的创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血(11.5%对4.1%)以及未指定持续时间的伴有LOC的脑震荡(8.2%对1.1%)。国防部设施中最常见的MS-DRG是无并发症/合并症或主要并发症/合并症的脑震荡(16.1%),而退伍军人事务部设施中是伴有并发症/合并症的创伤性昏迷和昏迷<1小时(27.5%)。在诊断调整模型中,国防部设施治疗的SMV的ICU利用率较高(OR 2.19,95% CI 1.47,3.25),尽管住院时间较短(-3.67,95% CI -5.43,-1.9)。女性SMV的诊断调整住院时间显著较短(-1.88,95% CI -3.69,-.07)。未经调整的总住院成本(13,548美元对23,084美元)在国防部显著低于退伍军人事务部设施,但在诊断调整模型中,两个系统的总边际成本和每日边际成本在统计学上均无显著差异。MS-DRG调整模型也得到了类似结果。

结论

本研究发现,国防部设施对TBI的SMV治疗比退伍军人事务部更密集、更迅速。在国防部设施住院的SMV更年轻,更可能是女性,并且有与LOC相关的诊断。相比之下,在退伍军人事务部设施住院的SMV中伴有并发症和合并症的MS-DRG发生率要高得多。发现女性SMV的住院时间较短,这与平民住院情况一致。这些发现存在局限性,因为现役军人和退伍军人在受伤机制和非住院合并症方面是不同的群体,而住院数据中并未考虑这些因素。尽管存在局限性,但研究结果表明,作为两个政府系统,国防部和退伍军人事务部在治疗TBI方面的边际成本相似。未来的研究应纳入具有受伤机制、军事特征和非住院合并症数据的SMV队列。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验