• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高频电磁耦合供电式永久性周围神经刺激器治疗慢性颅面疼痛的前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of High-Frequency Electromagnetic Coupling Powered Permanent Peripheral Nerve Stimulator for the Treatment of Chronic Craniofacial Pain.

作者信息

Hayek Salim M, Haider Nameer, Viswanathan Ashwin, Desai Mehul, Rosenberg Jeffrey, Vanquathem Niek E

机构信息

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.

Omni Surgery Center, Utica, NY.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2025 Sep;28(5):417-429.

PMID:40986904
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Craniofacial pain is one of the most common chronic pain conditions, affecting more than one-fifth of the US population. While various medications and conservative treatment modalities are available for this condition, many patients have refractory symptoms. These patients suffer from social impairment, reduced quality of life, and increased financial burdens.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of patients receiving a permanent, high-frequency electromagnetic coupling (HF-EMC) powered peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) system for the treatment of chronic craniofacial neuropathic pain.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted under an investigational device exemption (IDE).

SETTING

This study was conducted in 7 clinical sites in the US.

METHODS

All patients in this randomized controlled trial (RCT) were permanently implanted with the Freedom® Peripheral Nerve Stimulator (PNS) System (Curonix LLC). All patients completed an initial 7-day therapy assessment period following the permanent implantation. The patients who successfully completed the initial 7-day therapy assessment period (>= 50% pain relief) were randomly assigned to either a patient group that received continued stimulation (the "active" arm) or a patient group whose treatment was discontinued for 3 months after the initial positive 7-day therapy assessment period (the "deactivated" stimulation arm). After the 3-month follow-up visit, the deactivated patients were reactivated. The primary efficacy outcome included the proportion of patients who experienced significant pain relief (>= 50%) 3 months after the permanent implant procedure. The visual analog scale (VAS), Brief Pain Inventory Facial (BPIF) questionnaire, and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (MPQ-SF-2) were used to measure changes in pain. Additional functional outcome measures included the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and the 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

During the 7-day therapy assessment period, 56 out of 60 patients reported significant pain relief (>= 50%), representing a 93% responder rate. At 3 months, 69% of the active stimulation group experienced significant pain relief, while only 11% of the deactivated group reported significant pain relief. The mean VAS scores were reduced by 62% and 8.5% in the active and deactivated stimulation groups. When patients within the deactivated group were reactivated after 3 months, the reactivated patients reported similar reduction in pain scores to those reported by the active arm patients. Similar results were found for the functional outcome measures. After the reactivation, significant pain relief was maintained through the 12-month follow-up period. No SAEs were reported throughout the study for any of the patients.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include the lack of true placebo due to the required use or nonuse of the external transmitter as control per the study design, the optional utilization of supra- or sub-threshold stimulation, and variations in patient follow-up due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

This RCT operated under an IDE requiring regulatory FDA oversight. This study provides Level 1 evidence for PNS therapy. The positive outcomes of this study support an expanded PNS indication for the treatment of craniofacial pain. The study confirms that HF-EMC powered permanent PNS is an effective and safe intervention for refractory chronic craniofacial neuropathic pain.

摘要

背景

颅面疼痛是最常见的慢性疼痛病症之一,影响着超过五分之一的美国人口。虽然针对这种病症有多种药物和保守治疗方式,但许多患者有难治性症状。这些患者遭受社会功能损害、生活质量下降和经济负担增加之苦。

目的

本研究的目的是检查接受永久性高频电磁耦合(HF - EMC)供电的周围神经刺激器(PNS)系统治疗慢性颅面神经性疼痛的患者的临床结局。

研究设计

本研究是一项在研究性器械豁免(IDE)下进行的多中心、随机、对照临床试验。

设置

本研究在美国的7个临床地点进行。

方法

本随机对照试验(RCT)中的所有患者均永久性植入Freedom®周围神经刺激器(PNS)系统(Curonix LLC)。所有患者在永久性植入后完成初始7天的治疗评估期。成功完成初始7天治疗评估期(疼痛缓解≥50%)的患者被随机分配到接受持续刺激的患者组(“活跃”组)或在初始7天积极治疗评估期后治疗中断3个月的患者组(“停用”刺激组)。在3个月的随访就诊后,停用的患者重新激活。主要疗效结局包括永久性植入手术后3个月经历显著疼痛缓解(≥50%)的患者比例。视觉模拟量表(VAS)、面部简短疼痛量表(BPIF)问卷和简化麦吉尔疼痛问卷2(MPQ - SF - 2)用于测量疼痛变化。额外的功能结局指标包括患者总体变化印象(PGIC)和36项简短调查问卷(SF - 36)。

结果

在7天治疗评估期内,60名患者中有56名报告疼痛显著缓解(≥50%),缓解率为93%。在3个月时,活跃刺激组69%的患者经历了显著疼痛缓解,而停用组只有11%的患者报告有显著疼痛缓解。活跃和停用刺激组的平均VAS评分分别降低了62%和8.5%。停用组患者在3个月后重新激活时,重新激活的患者报告的疼痛评分降低情况与活跃组患者相似。功能结局指标也有类似结果。重新激活后,在12个月的随访期内疼痛持续显著缓解。整个研究期间,所有患者均未报告严重不良事件。

局限性

局限性包括由于研究设计要求使用或不使用外部发射器作为对照而缺乏真正的安慰剂、超阈值或亚阈值刺激的可选使用以及由于新冠疫情导致患者随访的差异。

结论

本RCT在需要美国食品药品监督管理局监管的IDE下进行。本研究为PNS治疗提供了1级证据。本研究的积极结果支持扩大PNS治疗颅面疼痛的适应证。该研究证实,HF - EMC供电的永久性PNS是治疗难治性慢性颅面神经性疼痛的一种有效且安全的干预措施。

相似文献

1
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of High-Frequency Electromagnetic Coupling Powered Permanent Peripheral Nerve Stimulator for the Treatment of Chronic Craniofacial Pain.高频电磁耦合供电式永久性周围神经刺激器治疗慢性颅面疼痛的前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验
Pain Physician. 2025 Sep;28(5):417-429.
2
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Using High-Frequency Electromagnetic Coupling Technology to Power an Implanted Neurostimulator with a Separate Receiver at the Superior Cluneal Nerve for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Due to Neuralgia: A Retrospective Study.使用高频电磁耦合技术通过在臀上皮神经处的单独接收器为植入式神经刺激器供电以治疗神经痛所致慢性背痛的周围神经刺激:一项回顾性研究
Pain Physician. 2024 Nov;27(8):E937-E942.
3
Novel technique for trialing peripheral nerve stimulation: ultrasonography-guided StimuCath trial.外周神经刺激试验的新技术:超声引导下的StimuCath试验
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Mar;42(3):E5. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.FOCUS16475.
4
Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines for Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Management of Chronic Pain: From the American Society Of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP).综合循证指南:植入式周围神经刺激 (PNS) 治疗慢性疼痛:美国介入性疼痛医师学会 (ASIPP) 制定。
Pain Physician. 2024 Nov;27(S9):S115-S191.
5
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Using High-frequency Electromagnetic Coupling (HF-EMC) Technology to Power an Implanted Neurostimulator With a Separate Receiver for Treating Peripheral Neuropathy.利用高频电磁耦合 (HF-EMC) 技术为植入式神经刺激器供电的周围神经刺激,该刺激器带有单独的接收器,用于治疗周围神经病变。
Pain Physician. 2024 Sep;27(7):E725-E730.
6
Trigeminal and occipital peripheral nerve stimulation for craniofacial pain: a single-institution experience and review of the literature.三叉神经和枕神经周围神经刺激治疗颅面部疼痛:单机构经验及文献综述
Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Dec 15;21(6):E5. doi: 10.3171/foc.2006.21.6.8.
7
Is Response to a Pre-implant Diagnostic Peripheral Nerve Block Associated With Efficacy After Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Implantation? A Ten-Year Enterprise-Wide Analysis.预先植入诊断性周围神经阻滞的反应是否与周围神经刺激植入后的疗效相关?一项十年的企业范围分析。
Neuromodulation. 2024 Jul;27(5):873-880. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
8
Multi-waveform Spinal Cord Stimulation with High Frequency Electromagnetic Coupled (HF-EMC) Powered Implanted Electrode Array and Receiver for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain (SURF Study).采用高频电磁耦合(HF-EMC)供电的植入式电极阵列和接收器进行多波形脊髓刺激治疗慢性腰腿痛(SURF研究)。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):67-76.
9
A novel miniature, wireless neurostimulator in the management of chronic craniofacial pain: Preliminary results from a prospective pilot study.一种新型微型无线神经刺激器用于慢性颅面部疼痛的治疗:一项前瞻性初步研究的结果
Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:350-354. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
10
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Uses High-Frequency Electromagnetic Technology to Power an Implanted Neurostimulator with a Separate Receiver for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in the Lower Extremities.周围神经刺激使用高频电磁技术为植入式神经刺激器供电,刺激器带有单独的接收器,用于治疗下肢慢性疼痛。
Pain Physician. 2024 May;27(4):223-227.