• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化左心室辅助装置速度:针对心力衰竭临床医生的系统评价

Optimizing left ventricular assist device speed: a systematic review for the heart failure clinician.

作者信息

Jimenez Yomary, Tsai Christina, Mrizigue Fatima, Ahmed Mustafa M

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Department of Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Future Cardiol. 2025 Sep 24:1-8. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2564017.

DOI:10.1080/14796678.2025.2564017
PMID:40988576
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Left ventricular assist devices have been demonstrated to improve both quality of life and improve survival in patients with end-stage heart failure. Ideal speed setting of these devices is necessary to provide adequate left ventricular unloading while not disadvantaging the right heart. This highlights the potential utility of speed titration studies.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were searched for: (LVAD) OR (Left Ventricular Assist Device) OR (VAD) OR (Ventricular Assist Device) AND (Speed Optimization) OR (Ramp Study) from inception to April 2025.

RESULTS

22 studies with 749 total patients were included, 45% of whom had a Heart Mate 3. Outcomes of interest included mortality, readmission, RV function, speed change at conclusion of the study, and quality of life. Only 1 out of 22 studies reported all 5 outcomes, with 64% reporting 2 or fewer outcomes of interest.

CONCLUSION

There exists limited data on speed optimization in the HM3, and that which has been reported lacks a standardization regarding method of evaluation as well as outcomes reporting. Prospective studies, with a standard method of speed optimization and more detailed outcomes reporting, are necessary in order to define best practices.

摘要

引言

左心室辅助装置已被证明可改善终末期心力衰竭患者的生活质量并提高生存率。这些装置的理想速度设置对于提供足够的左心室卸载同时又不给右心带来不利影响是必要的。这凸显了速度滴定研究的潜在效用。

方法

对PubMed、Scopus以及护理与联合健康文献累积索引数据库进行检索,检索时间从数据库创建至2025年4月,检索词为:(LVAD) 或 (Left Ventricular Assist Device) 或 (VAD) 或 (Ventricular Assist Device) 以及 (Speed Optimization) 或 (Ramp Study)。

结果

纳入了22项研究,共计749例患者,其中45%使用的是Heart Mate 3。感兴趣的结局包括死亡率、再入院率、右心室功能、研究结束时的速度变化以及生活质量。22项研究中只有1项报告了所有5个结局,64%的研究报告了2个或更少感兴趣的结局。

结论

关于Heart Mate 3速度优化的数据有限,并且已报告的数据在评估方法和结局报告方面缺乏标准化。有必要进行前瞻性研究,采用标准化的速度优化方法并进行更详细的结局报告,以确定最佳实践。

相似文献

1
Optimizing left ventricular assist device speed: a systematic review for the heart failure clinician.优化左心室辅助装置速度:针对心力衰竭临床医生的系统评价
Future Cardiol. 2025 Sep 24:1-8. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2564017.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for advanced heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.左心室辅助装置作为晚期心力衰竭的终末期治疗的临床和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(38):1-237. doi: 10.3310/MLFA4009.
4
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of second- and third-generation left ventricular assist devices as either bridge to transplant or alternative to transplant for adults eligible for heart transplantation: systematic review and cost-effectiveness model.第二代和第三代左心室辅助装置作为适合心脏移植的成人移植桥接或替代治疗的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价和成本效益模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Nov;17(53):1-499, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta17530.
5
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation.终末期心力衰竭患者使用左心室辅助装置的临床疗效及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(45):1-132, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9450.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
7
Evaluation of the ventricular assist device programme in the UK.英国心室辅助装置项目评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(48):1-119, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10480.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.