Lastinger Julia, Palasz Natalia, Oppelt Peter, Toktarbekov Galymzhan, Terzic Milan, Stein Raimund, Rall Katharina, Wagner Helga, Hermann Philipp, Kiblboeck Stephanie
Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Endocrinology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Altenbergerstrasse 69, Linz 4020, Austria.
Clinical Academic Department of Women's Health, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Kerey and Zhanibek Khandar Street 5/1, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025 Aug 26;27:100425. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100425. eCollection 2025 Sep.
To study the usability, reproducibility and practicality of the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine Müllerian Anomalies Classification (ASRM MAC2021) compared to the formerly used American Fertility Society (AFS) classification. The main focus of this paper is to present clinicians' assessment when using these classification systems and to explore possible benefits and disadvantages of the transformation of the AFS into the more recently published ASRM classification. To incorporate all commonly used classification systems, all cases were additionally classified using the ESHRE/ESGE and the VCUAM classification.
An observational study using a questionnaire and opinion survey was conducted with the goal of comparing clinicians' subjective usability and reproducibility of the AFS classification with the newly presented ASRM MAC2021 classification. Cases of female genital malformations encompassed a wide range of various anomalies, including vaginal, cervical and adnexal conditions and associated malformations.
The study investigators rated the ASRM MAC2021 classification better in relation to usability and reproducibility compared to the AFS classification. It significantly improved diagnostic precision for vaginal and cervical anomalies and expanded recognition of adnexal malformations. However, challenges remain in addressing associated malformations. Clinicians ranked the ASRM MAC2021 higher than the AFS classification. However, investigators rated the ESHRE/ESGE and VCUAM classifications better in the overall assessment of female genital malformations.
The ASRM MAC2021 classification offers substantial improvements in diagnosing and managing female genital malformations, addressing limitations of the AFS system. With better usability and subjective reproducibility, further refinements are needed to fully address complex associated anomalies - emphasizing the importance of evolving classification systems.
研究修订后的美国生殖医学学会苗勒管异常分类(ASRM MAC2021)与先前使用的美国生育学会(AFS)分类相比的可用性、可重复性和实用性。本文的主要重点是展示临床医生在使用这些分类系统时的评估,并探讨将AFS分类转变为最近发布的ASRM分类可能带来的利弊。为纳入所有常用分类系统,所有病例还使用ESHRE/ESGE和VCUAM分类进行了额外分类。
采用问卷调查和意见调查进行观察性研究,目的是比较临床医生对AFS分类与新提出的ASRM MAC2021分类的主观可用性和可重复性。女性生殖器畸形病例涵盖了广泛的各种异常,包括阴道、宫颈和附件疾病以及相关畸形。
与AFS分类相比,研究调查人员认为ASRM MAC2021分类在可用性和可重复性方面更好。它显著提高了阴道和宫颈异常的诊断精度,并扩大了对附件畸形的认识。然而,在处理相关畸形方面仍存在挑战。临床医生对ASRM MAC2021的排名高于AFS分类。然而,在女性生殖器畸形的总体评估中,研究人员认为ESHRE/ESGE和VCUAM分类更好。
ASRM MAC2021分类在诊断和管理女性生殖器畸形方面有显著改进,解决了AFS系统的局限性。由于具有更好的可用性和主观可重复性,需要进一步完善以充分解决复杂的相关异常——强调了不断发展分类系统的重要性。