Longo Diego, Baccini Marco, Cherubini Giulio, Caporaso Aurora, De Marco Mario, Politi Angela, Santini Guido, Cecchi Francesca, Bagni Maria Angela
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence - Italy.
IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi Onlus, Florence - Italy.
Arch Physiother. 2025 Sep 19;15:250-264. doi: 10.33393/aop.2025.3428. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Spasticity is a common symptom after brain injury, often interfering with functional recovery and rehabilitation. The Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold (TSRT) was proposed as an objective neurophysiological assessment of spasticity that could overcome the limitations of clinical scales. This systematic review aimed to appraise the current evidence on the metric properties of TSRT.
Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE) were screened from inception to June 30, 2025, for studies reporting data on reliability, validity, and/or responsiveness of TSRT in adults with stroke. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed the methodological quality, and extracted relevant data. When possible, pooled estimates for each property were computed.
Of the 9804 titles retrieved, 17 were eventually included, to which 2 articles from cross-references were added. We found insufficient values for both intra-rater (two studies, ICC = 0.548, 0.330-0.710) and inter-rater (three studies, ICC = 0.687, 0.511-0.808) reliability, with high measurement error. Data on validity were found in 14 articles, with conflicting results on the association of TSRT with clinical scales of spasticity and motricity, but good ability to discriminate among relevant groups. Only one study investigated responsiveness with an external anchor, finding that TSRT measurements failed to accurately detect improved participants.
Despite the potential of TSRT as a measure of spasticity, its metric properties, particularly reliability, are not fully supported. Future research should prioritize improving its reliability and investigating its validity and responsiveness with neurophysiological measures rather than relying solely on clinical scales.
痉挛是脑损伤后常见的症状,常干扰功能恢复和康复。强直伸展反射阈值(TSRT)被提议作为一种客观的神经生理学痉挛评估方法,可克服临床量表的局限性。本系统评价旨在评估目前关于TSRT度量特性的证据。
检索电子数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science和EMBASE),从建库至2025年6月30日,查找报告TSRT在成人卒中患者中的可靠性、有效性和/或反应性数据的研究。两名评审员独立选择研究、评估方法学质量并提取相关数据。尽可能计算每个特性的合并估计值。
在检索到的9804篇标题中,最终纳入17篇,另外从交叉引用中添加了2篇文章。我们发现,评分者内(两项研究,ICC = 0.548,0.330 - 0.710)和评分者间(三项研究,ICC = 0.687,0.511 - 0.808)可靠性的值均不足,测量误差较大。14篇文章中有有效性数据,关于TSRT与痉挛和运动能力临床量表之间的关联结果相互矛盾,但在区分相关组方面能力良好。只有一项研究使用外部对照物调查了反应性,发现TSRT测量未能准确检测出改善的参与者。
尽管TSRT有作为痉挛测量方法的潜力,但其度量特性,尤其是可靠性,未得到充分支持。未来研究应优先提高其可靠性,并通过神经生理学测量方法研究其有效性和反应性,而不是仅依赖临床量表。