• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中胸段脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的呼吸相关结局比较:一项回顾性研究

Comparative respiratory outcomes of thoracic spinal versus general anesthesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A retrospective study.

作者信息

Secco Gianmarco, Vailati Davide, Basta Benedetta, Bonvecchio Emilio, Fusco Tiziana, Mori Luigi, Magistro Carmelo, Marino Giovanni

机构信息

Departments of Anaesthesia and ICU, Melegnano Hospital, ASST Melegnano e Martesana, Vizzolo Predabissi, Milan, Italy.

Department of General Surgery, Melegnano Hospital, ASST Melegnano e Martesana, Vizzolo Predabissi, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Saudi J Anaesth. 2025 Oct-Dec;19(4):573-579. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_372_25. Epub 2025 Sep 3.

DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_372_25
PMID:40994475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12456637/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuraxial anesthesia (NA), specifically thoracic spinal anesthesia (TSA), offers several theoretical advantages when compared to the General Anesthesia (GA). This retrospective study compares TSA with the gold standard GA in elective colorectal laparoscopic surgery and evaluates the impact on respiratory functions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The data used in this study were extracted from the medical records of 34 consecutive patients, who had undergone laparoscopic colon resection surgery in Melegnano Hospital-ASST Melegnano Martesana-Italy and had been administered NA or GA. Postoperative lung function was assessed via lung ultrasound [Lung Ultrasound Score(LUS)], and PaO/FiO (P/F) ratio.

RESULTS

The average duration of the surgical procedure was 201.9 ± 50.4 min (NA 191.1 ± 44.1 vs. GA 212 ± 55.3 min, = 0.21). Arterial blood gas parameters showed a reduction in the postoperative values of P/F ratio (P/F: NA 387 ± 70 vs GA 342 ± 52, = 0.049). LUS reveals a higher prevalence of atelectasis in the poster-inferior lung regions. After surgery, the pre- and post-operative LUS scores (Delta LUS) showed differences in the GA group (NA 1.8 ± 1.8 vs GA 3.8 ± 1.9, = 0.003). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve proved to be very accurate (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.898, < 0.001) in predicting postoperative oxygen support, even more so in the GA group (2 in the NA group vs 7 in the GA).

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of a progressively aging population and an increase in the fragility of patients, NA with spontaneous ventilation appears to exert a minor impact on respiratory function compared to GA.

摘要

背景

与全身麻醉(GA)相比,神经轴索麻醉(NA),尤其是胸段脊髓麻醉(TSA)具有若干理论优势。本回顾性研究比较了择期结直肠腹腔镜手术中TSA与金标准GA,并评估其对呼吸功能的影响。

材料与方法

本研究使用的数据取自意大利梅莱尼亚诺医院 - 梅莱尼亚诺 - 马尔泰萨纳地方卫生管理局连续34例接受腹腔镜结肠切除术并接受NA或GA的患者的病历。通过肺部超声[肺部超声评分(LUS)]和动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数(P/F)比值评估术后肺功能。

结果

手术平均时长为201.9±50.4分钟(NA组191.1±44.1分钟,GA组212±55.3分钟,P = 0.21)。动脉血气参数显示术后P/F比值降低(P/F:NA组387±70,GA组342±52,P = 0.049)。LUS显示下肺后段肺不张的发生率更高。术后,GA组术前和术后LUS评分(LUS差值)存在差异(NA组1.8±1.8,GA组3.8±1.9,P = 0.003)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线在预测术后氧支持方面非常准确(曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.898,P < 0.001),在GA组中更是如此(NA组2例,GA组7例)。

结论

在人口逐渐老龄化以及患者脆弱性增加的背景下,与GA相比,自主通气的NA对呼吸功能的影响似乎较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/12456637/8da87b2ffd5a/SJA-19-573-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/12456637/6ceaadb641f8/SJA-19-573-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/12456637/4d16a92daeab/SJA-19-573-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/12456637/8da87b2ffd5a/SJA-19-573-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/12456637/6ceaadb641f8/SJA-19-573-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/12456637/4d16a92daeab/SJA-19-573-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/12456637/8da87b2ffd5a/SJA-19-573-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative respiratory outcomes of thoracic spinal versus general anesthesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A retrospective study.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中胸段脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的呼吸相关结局比较:一项回顾性研究
Saudi J Anaesth. 2025 Oct-Dec;19(4):573-579. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_372_25. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
2
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
3
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
4
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under neuraxial anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: Systematic review and meta-analyses.椎管内麻醉下腹腔镜胆囊切除术与全身麻醉的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep;41:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
5
Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in early infancy.早产低龄婴儿行腹股沟疝修补术时区域麻醉(脊髓麻醉、硬膜外麻醉、骶管麻醉)与全身麻醉的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 9;2015(6):CD003669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003669.pub2.
6
Neuraxial Compared With General Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes After Hip Arthroplasty for Geriatric Hip Fracture: Results From a National Database.老年髋部骨折髋关节置换术后神经轴索麻醉与全身麻醉对术后结局的影响:来自国家数据库的结果
Anesth Analg. 2025 Sep 26. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007758.
7
Shoulder Arthrogram肩关节造影
8
The correlation between lung ultrasound scores and outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in infants with severe pneumonia.肺部超声评分与高流量鼻导管治疗婴儿重症肺炎结局的相关性。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jan 16;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04522-7.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Thoracic Segmental Anesthesia for Major Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery in a Heart Transplant Recipient: A Case Report.心脏移植受者行大型腹腔镜腹部手术的胸段节段性麻醉:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Nov 23;16(11):e74309. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74309. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Lung ultrasound for evaluating perioperative atelectasis and aeration in the post-anesthesia care unit.用于评估麻醉后护理单元围手术期肺不张和通气的肺部超声。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Oct;37(5):1295-1302. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-00994-7. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
3
This is why you should (not) use spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic surgeries.
这就是为什么你应该(不应该)在腹腔镜手术中使用脊髓麻醉的原因。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Oct-Dec;16(4):371-373. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_380_22. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
4
2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.2022年欧洲心脏病学会非心脏手术患者心血管评估与管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 14;43(39):3826-3924. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270.
5
Perioperative Pulmonary Atelectasis: Part I. Biology and Mechanisms.围手术期肺不张:第一部分。生物学与机制。
Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):181-205. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003943.
6
Quantitative Lung Ultrasound: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications.定量肺部超声:技术方面与临床应用。
Anesthesiology. 2021 Jun 1;134(6):949-965. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003757.
7
Lung ultrasound presentation of COVID-19 patients: phenotypes and correlations.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的肺部超声表现:表型及相关性
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;16(5):1317-1327. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02620-9. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
Correction to: Feasibility and efficacy of lung ultrasound to investigate pulmonary complications in patients who developed postoperative Hypoxaemia-a prospective study.对《肺部超声在调查术后低氧血症患者肺部并发症中的可行性和有效性——一项前瞻性研究》的更正
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01196-3.
9
The effect of dexmedetomidine on spinal anesthesia quality and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery: intravenous versus intrathecal.右美托咪定对行腹股沟疝修补术患者椎管内麻醉质量和血液动力学变化的影响:静脉与鞘内。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;76(7):923-928. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02870-8. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
10
Spinal anesthesia is a viable option for emergent laparoscopic procedure in high-risk patients.脊髓麻醉是高危患者急诊腹腔镜手术的一种可行选择。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):115-116. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_468_19. Epub 2020 Jan 6.