Vittoria De Martini Ilaria, Rogers Samuel N, Truscott Laurel, Ozgur Hasan
Radiology and Imaging Science, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, USA.
Pediatrics, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 24;17(8):e90906. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90906. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Post-dural puncture headaches (PDPH) are caused by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks that occur after a lumbar puncture (LP). Epidural blood patch (EBP) is an effective treatment option for patients with PDPH in whom conservative treatment fails. Special consideration has to be taken if the patient is affected by any hematological malignancy, due to the fact that EBP carries a theoretical risk of seeding the malignancy into the neuroaxis. The frequent occurrence of immunocompromised status and thrombocytopenia in this patient population warrants individual assessment prior to decision-making. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate that EBP is a safe treatment option if used in the right clinical setting.
In our study, we report the imaging and clinical findings of five patients with hematologic malignancies who developed PDPH following LP. All patients failed to respond to conservative treatment and required EBP.
The EBP was successfully performed in all five patients. The preprocedural brain and spine MRI findings were concerning for CSF leak, demonstrating subdural fluid collections, pachymeningeal enhancement, and brain sagging. All patients responded favorably to EBP with the resolution of symptoms. In the long-term follow-up, none of them developed postprocedural infections or neuroaxis tumor seeding. Thrombocytopenia did not result in failure of the procedure or any bleeding complications.
EBP is effective in treating conservative therapy-refractory PDPH in a patient population with underlying hematologic malignancies. Due to the increased risks of infection in the setting of immunosuppression, compromised coagulation status related to underlying malignancy, and possible tumor seeding to the neuroaxis, the procedure and possible associated risks should be discussed thoroughly with the patient and family.
We noticed in our practice that there is a lack of deep understanding of a specific patient population affected by hematologic malignancies developing postdural puncture headaches after an LP. As of today, there are no well-established guidelines regarding this specific situation, and every proceduralist has to make a decision whether they feel comfortable performing an EBP when conservative treatment fails, with the possible risk of disease spreading, infection, and bleeding. With our paper, we offered insights into our practice and results, and hope to serve as a helpful resource for proceduralists who are facing a similar clinical setting.
硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)由腰椎穿刺(LP)后发生的脑脊液(CSF)漏引起。硬膜外血贴(EBP)是保守治疗失败的PDPH患者的一种有效治疗选择。如果患者患有任何血液系统恶性肿瘤,则必须特别考虑,因为EBP理论上存在将恶性肿瘤播散至神经轴的风险。该患者群体中免疫功能低下状态和血小板减少症的频繁发生需要在决策前进行个体评估。我们研究的目的是证明在正确的临床环境中使用EBP是一种安全的治疗选择。
在我们的研究中,我们报告了5例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者在LP后发生PDPH的影像学和临床结果。所有患者对保守治疗均无反应,需要进行EBP。
所有5例患者均成功进行了EBP。术前脑和脊柱MRI检查结果提示CSF漏,表现为硬膜下积液、硬脑膜强化和脑下垂。所有患者对EBP反应良好,症状缓解。在长期随访中,他们均未发生术后感染或神经轴肿瘤播散。血小板减少症未导致手术失败或任何出血并发症。
EBP对治疗合并潜在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的保守治疗难治性PDPH有效。由于免疫抑制环境中感染风险增加、与潜在恶性肿瘤相关的凝血状态受损以及可能的肿瘤播散至神经轴,应与患者及其家属充分讨论该手术及可能的相关风险。
我们在实践中注意到,对于LP后发生PDPH的血液系统恶性肿瘤特定患者群体缺乏深入了解。截至目前,对于这种特定情况尚无完善的指南,每位手术医生在保守治疗失败时必须决定是否愿意进行EBP,同时要考虑疾病传播、感染和出血的潜在风险。通过我们的论文,我们分享了我们的实践经验和结果,希望能为面临类似临床情况的手术医生提供有用的参考。