Jovanović Rodoljub, Bermúdez Angela
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade/Guest Researcher, Department of Cultural Studes, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka, Croatia.
Center for Applied Ethics, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Deusto, Spain.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2026 Feb;67:102174. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102174. Epub 2025 Sep 12.
Starting from Galtung's typology of violence, we first track differing ways in which direct violence on one hand, and structural and cultural violence on the other, are remembered and represented. Following this, we examine research demonstrating how narratives of past violence are constructed in various cultural products, with the focus on history textbooks narratives, their tendency to distort, normalize and justify violence, as well as potential to do the opposite. Furthermore, we explore history education and its potential to help students engage with the memory of violence in a critical way. Finally, we look at how assuming the role of victim or being assigned a role of the perpetrator critically determines a sophisticated interplay between the memory of violence, social identities and moral perspectives.
从加尔通的暴力类型学出发，我们首先追踪直接暴力与结构暴力和文化暴力在被铭记与呈现方面的不同方式。在此之后，我们审视相关研究，这些研究展示了过去暴力的叙事如何在各种文化产品中构建，重点关注历史教科书叙事，其歪曲、使暴力常态化和为暴力辩护的倾向，以及产生相反效果的可能性。此外，我们探讨历史教育及其帮助学生以批判性方式面对暴力记忆的潜力。最后，我们考察扮演受害者角色或被赋予加害者角色如何决定性地塑造了暴力记忆、社会身份和道德观念之间复杂的相互作用。
