Togo Andrea, Lincetto Ornella, Bua Jenny, Mariani Ilaria, Lazzerini Marzia
Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.
Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Trieste, Italy.
J Glob Health. 2025 Sep 26;15:04263. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04263.
Person- and family-centred care in the field of neonatology (N&FCC) are promoted by many international agencies and scientific societies because of evidence-based benefits for infants, parents and health systems; however, being very broad and evolving concepts, they have not been uniformly defined in operational terms. We conducted a scoping review of literature relevant to N&FCC with the objectives of synthetising: 1) existing definitions; 2) models of care; 3) categories of interventions suggested by each model of care.
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles and/or grey literature published until 5 February 2024. For each objective, we considered articles and/or other documents, for any type of newborn.
The searches yielded 10 771 records. A total of 91 documents were deemed eligible for inclusion. We identified 40 relevant definitions and 28 different models of care of N&FCC. Both definitions and models of care were categorised in four macro-groups, based on their main focus: newborn and developmental care, parental participation to care, no separation between mother-baby, and miscellanea. Out of the 28 models of care, a total of 51 categories of interventions were identified, with a variable number (range 2-17) reported per each model. These were grouped in five macro-categories: individualised neonatal health care; organisation of care, human resources and policies; physical resources; health professionals (HPs) capacity strengthening and support; family empowerment and support. While most models included individualised neonatal care and family empowerment interventions, HPs were frequently neglected as beneficiaries of the intervention: only 11 models incorporated HPs capacity strengthening, only three proposed a wider support for HPs.
We identified and synthetised numerous definitions, models, and categories of interventions, highlighting the need for further conceptualisation and standardisation around the concept of N&FCC, including the perspective from low-middle income countries', and from both parents and staff involved in care.
由于对婴儿、父母和卫生系统有循证效益,新生儿学领域的以个人和家庭为中心的护理(N&FCC)得到了许多国际机构和科学协会的推广;然而,由于其概念非常宽泛且不断演变,在操作层面上尚未得到统一界定。我们对与N&FCC相关的文献进行了范围综述,目的是综合:1)现有定义;2)护理模式;3)每种护理模式建议的干预类别。
我们在PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、科学网和谷歌学术上搜索截至2024年2月5日发表的文章和/或灰色文献。对于每个目标,我们考虑了针对任何类型新生儿的文章和/或其他文件。
搜索产生了10771条记录。共有91份文件被认为符合纳入条件。我们确定了40个相关定义和28种不同的N&FCC护理模式。定义和护理模式均根据其主要重点分为四大类:新生儿与发育护理、父母参与护理、母婴不分离以及杂项。在28种护理模式中,共确定了51类干预措施,每种模式报告的干预措施数量不等(范围为2 - 17)。这些措施被分为五大类:个性化新生儿保健;护理、人力资源和政策的组织;物质资源;卫生专业人员(HPs)能力加强与支持;家庭赋权与支持。虽然大多数模式都包括个性化新生儿护理和家庭赋权干预措施,但卫生专业人员作为干预受益者却经常被忽视:只有11种模式纳入了卫生专业人员能力加强措施,只有3种模式提议对卫生专业人员提供更广泛的支持。
我们确定并综合了众多定义、模式和干预类别,强调需要围绕N&FCC概念进行进一步的概念化和标准化,包括从中低收入国家的角度,以及从参与护理的父母和工作人员的角度。