Suppr超能文献

财政压力作为中国公共服务供给的催化剂:来自增值税改革的证据

Fiscal stress as a catalyst for public service provision in China: evidence from the VAT reform.

作者信息

Cai Xiaoshan, Zhang Bin, Yang Jin

机构信息

School of Culture Tourism, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou, China.

Guangzhou Science and Technology Project Evaluation Center, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2025 Sep 10;10:1610852. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1610852. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Local government responses to fiscal stress are crucial for ensuring public service provision, especially in times of fiscal tightening. Previous studies have shown inconsistent findings, often focusing on developed countries in Europe and the United States. This study uses China's 2016 VAT reform as a quasi-natural experiment and applies a generalized difference-in-differences (DID) model to investigate the impact of fiscal stress on local government public service provision. The results reveal that fiscal stress promotes, rather than constrains, public service provision. The findings remain robust after a series of sensitivity tests. Furthermore, fiscal stress is found to be more conducive to enhancing public service provision in regions with lower fiscal decentralization, high-intensity intergovernmental competition, and higher fiscal transparency. This paper highlights the importance of a country's unique fiscal decentralization system and government performance evaluation goals in shaping local government behavior under fiscal stress. The findings provide valuable insights for improving fiscal allocation efficiency and guiding local government responses, with broader implications for similar studies in other developing countries.

摘要

地方政府对财政压力的应对措施对于确保公共服务供给至关重要,尤其是在财政紧缩时期。以往研究结果不一,且往往聚焦于欧美发达国家。本研究将中国2016年增值税改革作为一项准自然实验,并应用广义双重差分(DID)模型来考察财政压力对地方政府公共服务供给的影响。结果显示,财政压力促进而非抑制公共服务供给。经过一系列敏感性检验后,研究结果依然稳健。此外,研究发现财政压力在财政分权程度较低、政府间竞争激烈以及财政透明度较高的地区更有利于提升公共服务供给。本文强调了一个国家独特的财政分权制度和政府绩效评估目标在塑造财政压力下地方政府行为方面的重要性。研究结果为提高财政分配效率和指导地方政府应对措施提供了有价值的见解,对其他发展中国家的类似研究具有更广泛的启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7b/12459633/d72d1733c665/fsoc-10-1610852-g0001.jpg

本文引用的文献

3
Abortion laws and women's health.
J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;76:102413. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102413. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Shrinking budgets and the shrinkage of budget theory.
Public Adm Rev. 1982 Nov-Dec;42(6):509-15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验