Suppr超能文献

金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和腐生葡萄球菌在光滑、微纹理和宏观纹理硅酮生物材料上的黏附及定殖强度

Adhesion and Colonization Intensity of , and on Smooth, Micro-Textured, and Macro-Textured Silicone Biomaterials.

作者信息

Jurševičs Kirils, Skadiņš Ingus, Krasiļņikova Jeļena, Lece Anna, Šķesters Andrejs, Jurševičs Eduards

机构信息

Department of Doctoral Studies, Riga Stradiņš University, LV1007 Riga, Latvia.

Department of Biology and Microbiology, Riga Stradiņš University, LV1007 Riga, Latvia.

出版信息

J Funct Biomater. 2025 Sep 1;16(9):322. doi: 10.3390/jfb16090322.

Abstract

Implantable biomaterials are widely used in modern medicine, especially in orthopaedics, cardiovascular surgery, dentistry, and plastic and reconstructive surgery. The issue of the interaction of implants with body tissues and the risk of infection associated with them is one of the most studied and topical issues in medicine. It is very important to find a biomaterial that effectively combines both microbiology and tissue compatibility aspects. The aim of this research work was to determine the adhesion and colonization rates of , , and on smooth, microtextured, and macro-textured silicone biomaterials in an in vitro study. A total of 90 silicone biomaterial samples were used, 30 for each type of biomaterial. In each of the biomaterial groups, half of the samples ( = 15) were used to determine the adhesion intensity and the other half to determine the colonization intensity on the active surface of the biomaterial samples. The study found that and had the highest adhesion intensity on the macro-textured implant, while adhered best to smooth. Among the microorganisms, demonstrated the highest colonization rate, followed by and then . The most intensive colonization of microorganisms was on the macro-textured implant, then on the micro-textured, and then on the smooth. The smooth and micro-textured implants did not show statistically significant differences in the intensity of adhesion and colonization. The biomaterials did not show pro-oxidant or anti-oxidant properties, and no lipid peroxidation was induced by the biomaterials.

摘要

可植入生物材料在现代医学中广泛应用,尤其是在骨科、心血管外科、牙科以及整形和重建外科领域。植入物与身体组织的相互作用问题以及与之相关的感染风险是医学领域研究最多且最热门的问题之一。找到一种能有效兼顾微生物学和组织相容性两方面的生物材料非常重要。这项研究工作的目的是在一项体外研究中确定[具体微生物名称1]、[具体微生物名称2]和[具体微生物名称3]在光滑、微纹理和宏观纹理硅酮生物材料上的黏附率和定植率。总共使用了90个硅酮生物材料样本,每种生物材料30个。在每个生物材料组中,一半的样本(n = 15)用于确定黏附强度,另一半用于确定生物材料样本活性表面上的定植强度。研究发现,[具体微生物名称1]和[具体微生物名称2]在宏观纹理植入物上的黏附强度最高,而[具体微生物名称3]在光滑表面上黏附最佳。在这些微生物中,[具体微生物名称1]的定植率最高,其次是[具体微生物名称2],然后是[具体微生物名称3]。微生物定植最密集的是在宏观纹理植入物上,其次是微纹理植入物,然后是光滑植入物。光滑和微纹理植入物在黏附强度和定植强度上没有显示出统计学上的显著差异。这些生物材料没有表现出促氧化或抗氧化特性,并且生物材料没有诱导脂质过氧化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0661/12471252/a4a118a3505e/jfb-16-00322-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验