Ronen Naama, Brook Anna, Charter Motti
Shamir Research Institute, University of Haifa, Katzrin 1290000, Israel.
School of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Biology (Basel). 2025 Aug 22;14(9):1108. doi: 10.3390/biology14091108.
Rodent damage significantly affects agriculture around the world. Rodenticides can sometimes control pests, but they are costly, may cause secondary poisoning to nontarget wildlife, and can become less efficient over time due to bait shyness and resistance. Using wildlife as biological pest control agents, particularly barn owls ( spp.), has been suggested as an alternative. Barn owl nest boxes and hunting perches have been added to increase predator pressure, yet few studies have examined their effectiveness. We conducted a field study in forty-five 10 × 10 m plots to compare three treatments (biological pest control by adding hunting perches, 1080 rodenticide, and control) on rodent (vole) activity and crop health (alfalfa, ) using unmanned aerial system (UAS) remote sensing and ground surveys. Additionally, we used 24/7 video cameras and a machine learning (YOLOv5) object detection algorithm to determine whether hunting perches increase the presence of diurnal and nocturnal raptors. Rodent activity increased during the study and did not vary among the treatments across all three treatment groups, indicating that neither the biological pest control nor the rodenticides prevented the rodent population from increasing. Moreover, the vegetation indices clearly showed that the alfalfa has become increasingly damaged over time, due to the rising damage caused by rodents. There were significantly more raptors in plots with hunting perches than in control plots and those treated with rodenticides. Specifically, barn owls and diurnal raptors (mainly black-shouldered kites) spent 97.92% more time on hunting perch plots than rodenticide plots and 97.61% more time on hunting perch plots than control plots. The number of barn owls was positively related to vole activity, indicating a bottom-up process, while the number of black-shouldered kites was unrelated to vole activity. Even though hunting perches effectively increased the presence and activity of diurnal and nocturnal raptors, rodent populations increased. Future research should investigate whether hunting perches can increase raptor populations and improve crop health in crops beyond alfalfa, which is known to be particularly challenging to control for voles.
啮齿动物的破坏对全球农业产生了重大影响。杀鼠剂有时可以控制害虫,但成本高昂,可能会对非目标野生动物造成二次中毒,并且由于诱饵羞怯和抗药性,随着时间的推移效果可能会降低。有人建议将野生动物作为生物害虫控制剂,特别是仓鸮(Tyto spp.)。人们增加了仓鸮巢箱和狩猎栖木以增加捕食压力,但很少有研究考察它们的有效性。我们在45个10×10米的地块上进行了一项实地研究,使用无人机系统(UAS)遥感和地面调查,比较三种处理方式(通过添加狩猎栖木进行生物害虫控制、1080杀鼠剂和对照)对啮齿动物(田鼠)活动和作物健康(苜蓿)的影响。此外,我们使用全天候摄像机和机器学习(YOLOv5)目标检测算法来确定狩猎栖木是否增加了昼间和夜间猛禽的出现。在研究期间,啮齿动物活动增加,且在所有三个处理组的处理方式之间没有差异,这表明生物害虫控制和杀鼠剂都未能阻止啮齿动物数量的增加。此外,植被指数清楚地表明,由于啮齿动物造成的损害不断增加,苜蓿随时间推移受到的损害越来越大。有狩猎栖木地块中的猛禽数量明显多于对照地块和使用杀鼠剂处理的地块。具体而言,仓鸮和昼间猛禽(主要是黑肩鸢)在有狩猎栖木的地块上花费的时间比使用杀鼠剂的地块多97.92%,比对照地块多97.61%。仓鸮的数量与田鼠活动呈正相关,表明是一个自下而上的过程,而黑肩鸢的数量与田鼠活动无关。尽管狩猎栖木有效地增加了昼间和夜间猛禽的出现和活动,但啮齿动物数量仍在增加。未来的研究应该调查狩猎栖木是否能增加猛禽数量,并改善苜蓿以外作物的作物健康状况,苜蓿已知对田鼠控制特别具有挑战性。