Stramke William, Tonellotto Luca, Guenova Emmanuella, Kuonen François
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Sep 16;17(18):3019. doi: 10.3390/cancers17183019.
Accurate margin assessment during surgical treatment is essential to prevent recurrences of BCC. Mohs surgery or alternative peripheral and deep en-face margin assessment (PDEMA) based on conventional histopathology are considered the gold standard for excising high-risk BCC, as it allows stepwise and complete examination of peripheral and deep margins. However, it is labor-intensive and time-consuming. EVCM has emerged as a promising alternative, allowing rapid intraoperative evaluation of fresh excised tissue. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of EVCM in a PDEMA workflow of high-risk nodular BCCs. A retrospective monocentric study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) between March 2024 and May 2025. A total of 51 patients with histologically confirmed nodular BCCs considered as high-risk and thus addressed for EVCM-assisted excision were included, yielding 171 surgical margin samples. EVCM and conventional histology-based PDEMA analyses were compared. EVCM achieved an overall sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI: 71.7-98.9%) and specificity of 98.7% (95% CI: 95.2-99.7%) compared to conventional histology. The positive and negative predictive values were 88.2% (95% CI: 63.6-97.4%) and 99.4% (95% CI: 96.4-99.9%), respectively. EVCM demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for the intraoperative PDEMA of high-risk, nodular BCC. Its integration in PDEMA surgical workflows may improve efficiency, although confirmatory studies are needed in broader clinical settings.
在手术治疗过程中准确评估切缘对于预防基底细胞癌(BCC)复发至关重要。莫氏手术或基于传统组织病理学的外周及深部切缘全面评估(PDEMA)被认为是切除高危BCC的金标准,因为它能对周边和深部切缘进行逐步且完整的检查。然而,这一方法 labor-intensive 且耗时。电子视频共聚焦显微镜(EVCM)已成为一种有前景的替代方法,可对新鲜切除组织进行快速术中评估。为评估EVCM在高危结节性BCC的PDEMA工作流程中的诊断准确性。2024年3月至2025年5月在洛桑大学医院(CHUV)进行了一项回顾性单中心研究。共纳入51例经组织学确诊为高危结节性BCC并因此接受EVCM辅助切除的患者,共获得171个手术切缘样本。对EVCM和基于传统组织学的PDEMA分析进行了比较。与传统组织学相比,EVCM的总体敏感性为93.8%(95%置信区间:71.7 - 98.9%),特异性为98.7%(95%置信区间:95.2 - 99.7%)。阳性和阴性预测值分别为88.2%(95%置信区间:63.6 - 97.4%)和99.4%(95%置信区间:96.4 - 99.9%)。EVCM在高危结节性BCC的术中PDEMA方面显示出高诊断准确性。尽管需要在更广泛的临床环境中进行验证性研究,但将其纳入PDEMA手术工作流程可能会提高效率。