• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基础有效性的连续统上:来自目击科学对潜在指纹检验的启示。

On the Continuum of Foundational Validity: Lessons from Eyewitness Science for Latent Fingerprint Examination.

作者信息

Quigley-McBride Adele, Blackall T L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 22;15(9):1145. doi: 10.3390/bs15091145.

DOI:10.3390/bs15091145
PMID:41009176
Abstract

Whether forensic disciplines have established foundational validity-sufficient empirical evidence that a method reliably produces a predictable level of performance-has become a question of growing interest among scientists and legal professionals. This paper evaluates the foundational validity of two sources of forensic evidence relied upon in criminal cases: eyewitness identification decisions and latent fingerprint examiners' conclusions. Importantly, establishing foundational validity and estimating accuracy are conceptually and functionally different. Though eyewitnesses can often be mistaken, identification procedures recommended by researchers are grounded in decades of programmatic research that justifies the use of methods that improve the reliability of eyewitness decisions. In contrast, latent print research suggests that expert examiners can be very accurate, but foundational validity in this field is limited by an overreliance on a handful of black-box studies, the dismissal of smaller-scale, yet high-quality, research, and a tendency to treat foundational validity as a fixed destination rather than a continuum. Critically, the lack of a standardized method means that any estimates of examiner performance are not tied to any specific approach to latent print examination. Despite promising early work, until the field adopts and tests well-defined procedures, foundational validity in latent print examination will remain a goal still to be achieved.

摘要

法医学科是否已确立了基础有效性——即有足够的实证证据表明一种方法能可靠地产生可预测的表现水平——已成为科学家和法律专业人士日益关注的问题。本文评估了刑事案件中所依赖的两种法医证据来源的基础有效性:目击证人的辨认决定和潜在指纹鉴定人员的结论。重要的是,确立基础有效性和估计准确性在概念和功能上是不同的。尽管目击证人常常会出错,但研究人员推荐的辨认程序基于数十年的系统性研究,这些研究证明了使用能提高目击证人决定可靠性的方法是合理的。相比之下,潜在指纹研究表明专家鉴定人员可能非常准确,但该领域的基础有效性受到以下因素的限制:过度依赖少数黑箱研究、忽视规模较小但质量较高的研究,以及倾向于将基础有效性视为一个固定的目标而非一个连续体。至关重要的是,缺乏标准化方法意味着对鉴定人员表现的任何估计都与潜在指纹鉴定的任何特定方法无关。尽管早期工作很有前景,但在该领域采用并测试明确界定的程序之前,潜在指纹鉴定的基础有效性仍将是一个有待实现的目标。

相似文献

1
On the Continuum of Foundational Validity: Lessons from Eyewitness Science for Latent Fingerprint Examination.在基础有效性的连续统上:来自目击科学对潜在指纹检验的启示。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 22;15(9):1145. doi: 10.3390/bs15091145.
2
Shoulder Arthrogram肩关节造影
3
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
6
Salzmanns Nodular Corneal Degeneration萨尔茨曼结节状角膜变性
7
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
10
The development of a novel, standardized, norm-referenced Arabic Discourse Assessment Tool (ADAT), including an examination of psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia.开发一种新型、标准化、基于常模的阿拉伯语语篇评估工具(ADAT),包括评估失语症患者语篇测量的心理测量特性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):2103-2117. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13083. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy and reproducibility of latent print decisions on comparisons from searches of an automated fingerprint identification system.自动指纹识别系统搜索比对中潜在指纹鉴定的准确性和可重复性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2025 May;370:112457. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112457. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
The Hawthorne effect in studies of firearm and toolmark examiners.火器和工具痕迹检验员研究中的霍桑效应。
J Forensic Sci. 2025 Jul;70(4):1329-1337. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.70047. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Inconclusive decisions and error rates in forensic science.
法医学中的非决定性决策与错误率。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 May 4;8:100472. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100472. eCollection 2024.
4
New Insights on Expert Opinion About Eyewitness Memory Research.关于目击证人记忆研究的专家意见新见解。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Sep;20(5):903-924. doi: 10.1177/17456916241234837. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
5
The novel object-matching test (NOM Test): A psychometric measure of visual comparison ability.新型客体匹配测验(NOM Test):一种视觉比较能力的心理测量指标。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):680-689. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02069-6. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
6
Eyewitness confidence and decision time reflect identification accuracy in actual police lineups.目击证人的信心和决策时间反映了实际警察列队辨认中的识别准确性。
Law Hum Behav. 2023 Apr;47(2):333-347. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000518. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
7
Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency.超越 CSI:通过开放和透明来校准公众对法医学可靠性的信念。
Sci Justice. 2022 May;62(3):272-283. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
8
A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework.法医决策中信息管理的实用工具:在实际案件工作中使用扩展线性顺序揭露法(LSU-E)
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Feb 20;4:100216. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100216. eCollection 2022.
9
Match me if you can: Evidence for a domain-general visual comparison ability.与我匹配:通用视觉比较能力的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):866-881. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02044-2. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
10
Linear Sequential Unmasking- (LSU-): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias.线性顺序解蔽法(LSU):一种用于改善决策以及将噪声和偏差降至最低的通用方法。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Aug 13;3:100161. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100161. eCollection 2021.