Suppr超能文献

评估脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的单克隆抗体和多克隆抗体:疗效与安全性的系统评价

Assessing Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.

作者信息

Goulas Kyriakos, Müller Martin, Exadaktylos Aristomenis K

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Chur (Kantonsspital Graubünden), 7000 Chur, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Sep 11;26(18):8859. doi: 10.3390/ijms26188859.

Abstract

This systematic review critically evaluates the efficacy and safety of monoclonal (mAb) and polyclonal (pAb) antibody therapies in adult sepsis and septic shock by synthesizing data from 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing over 10,000 patients. Sepsis and septic shock continue to be major critical-care mortality causes worldwide because of simultaneous hyperinflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. The clinical results from using targeted antibody therapies to manage this dysregulated response have shown inconsistent results. We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (through February 2025) to identify RCTs that compared mAb and pAb treatments to placebo or standard care in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. Monoclonal antibodies against single cytokines e.g., Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) and endotoxin, did not significantly reduce 28-day mortality in unselected cohorts, though subgroup analyses of patients with elevated Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or early septic shock showed trends toward benefit. Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) enriched for Immunoglobulin M (IgM) demonstrated the most consistent mortality reduction when administered early in hyperinflammatory phases. Emerging precision strategies-including checkpoint inhibitors targeting Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 inhibitors (anti-PD-1/PD-L1), complement component 5a inhibitors (anti-C5a), and anti-adrenomedullin-were safe and improved organ-support-free days and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. According to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, evidence showed moderate confidence for mortality, high certainty for safety and low to moderate certainty for secondary outcomes. The use of broad single-target monoclonal treatments has failed to deliver significant improvements in sepsis patient outcomes. The most promising approaches for sepsis treatment involve biomarker-guided precision strategies and polyclonal IgM-enriched IVIG. Future sepsis trials need to implement rapid immune profiling and adaptive designs and combination regimens to achieve optimal efficacy and establish personalized guideline-based sepsis management.

摘要

本系统评价通过综合来自29项随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,对单克隆(mAb)和多克隆(pAb)抗体疗法在成人脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的疗效和安全性进行了批判性评估,这些试验涵盖了超过10000名患者。由于同时存在过度炎症反应和免疫抑制反应,脓毒症和脓毒性休克仍然是全球重症监护病房主要的死亡原因。使用靶向抗体疗法来控制这种失调反应的临床结果并不一致。我们对MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL、Web of Science和谷歌学术(截至2025年2月)进行了全面检索,以确定在成人脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者中比较mAb和pAb治疗与安慰剂或标准治疗的RCT。针对单一细胞因子(如肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和内毒素)的单克隆抗体,在未选择的队列中并未显著降低28天死亡率,不过对白介素-6(IL-6)升高或早期脓毒性休克患者的亚组分析显示有获益趋势。富含免疫球蛋白M(IgM)的静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)在过度炎症期早期给药时,显示出最一致的死亡率降低效果。新兴的精准策略——包括靶向程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1抑制剂(抗PD-1/PD-L1)的检查点抑制剂、补体成分5a抑制剂(抗C5a)和抗肾上腺髓质素——是安全的,并改善了无器官支持天数和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。根据推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法,证据显示对死亡率的信心为中等,对安全性的确定性高,对次要结局的确定性为低到中等。广泛使用单一靶点的单克隆治疗未能显著改善脓毒症患者的预后。脓毒症治疗最有前景的方法包括生物标志物引导的精准策略和富含多克隆IgM的IVIG。未来的脓毒症试验需要实施快速免疫分析、适应性设计和联合治疗方案,以实现最佳疗效并建立基于个性化指南的脓毒症管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验