Gibson Dennis, Plotkin Millie, Foster Marina, Mehler Philip S
ACUTE Center for Eating Disorders and Severe Malnutrition at Denver Health, 723 Delaware St., Pav M, Denver, CO 80204, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Nutrients. 2025 Sep 19;17(18):2998. doi: 10.3390/nu17182998.
Treatment for superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome can include either weight restoration (conservative management) or surgical intervention, with the latter recommended when individuals fail conservative management. However, reasons for failure of conservative management are poorly understood. This systematic review seeks to better understand predictors of treatment outcomes for malnourished individuals with SMA syndrome, specifically regarding weight restoration and behavioral health intervention, and to better understand why individuals fail conservative management. Medline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for articles that assessed treatment interventions for SMA syndrome in malnourished individuals. Seventy-three articles (n = 189 malnourished individuals with SMA syndrome) were included in the final review. Most of the articles (n = 57) had an increased risk of bias as the amount of weight gain with treatment was not explicitly defined and thus the attribution of outcome for "failure" of conservative management could not be ascribed. Modest weight gain (mean 5.64 kg [12.1% body weight increase] or 1.3 kg/m body mass index increase [9.4% increase in ideal body weight]) was associated with positive outcomes of conservative management. Psychological care also positively impacted treatment outcomes, especially for individuals with comorbid psychiatric conditions. Patients who achieve even modest weight gain have resolution of their SMA-related symptoms without a need for surgical intervention. Psychological treatment should be included for any patient struggling to achieve adequate weight restoration, with subsequent improved outcomes, given the high frequency of comorbid mental health illnesses, especially eating disorders.
肠系膜上动脉(SMA)综合征的治疗方法包括体重恢复(保守治疗)或手术干预,当个体保守治疗失败时推荐采用后者。然而,保守治疗失败的原因尚不清楚。本系统评价旨在更好地了解患有SMA综合征的营养不良个体治疗结果的预测因素,特别是关于体重恢复和行为健康干预方面,并更好地理解个体保守治疗失败的原因。检索了Medline、Embase和科学网,以查找评估对营养不良个体SMA综合征治疗干预措施的文章。最终纳入73篇文章(n = 189例患有SMA综合征的营养不良个体)。大多数文章(n = 57)存在偏倚风险增加的情况,因为未明确界定治疗后体重增加的量,因此无法将保守治疗“失败”的结果归因。适度体重增加(平均5.64 kg[体重增加12.1%]或体重指数每平方米增加1.3 kg[理想体重增加9.4%])与保守治疗的积极结果相关。心理护理也对治疗结果产生积极影响,尤其是对患有合并精神疾病的个体。即使体重仅适度增加的患者也可缓解与SMA相关的症状,而无需手术干预。鉴于合并精神疾病尤其是饮食失调的发生率较高,对于任何难以实现足够体重恢复的患者都应包括心理治疗,从而改善后续结果。