Čelar Aleš, Lettner Stefan, Jonke Erwin
Clinical Division of Orthodontics, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2a, 1090 Wien, Austria.
Karl Donath Laboratory, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2a, 1090 Wien, Austria.
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 17;14(18):6553. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186553.
To investigate if the sagittal inclinations of anterior occlusal plane (AOP) and posterior occlusal plane (POP) differ between skeletal classes II and III in the mixed dentition period. Retrospective analysis of cross-sectional lateral cephalometric radiograph data of 61 children with skeletal class II and 60 children with skeletal class III (average age 8.4 ± 1.5 years). We measured the inclinations of AOP and POP to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) and the sella-nasion line (SN). Angles FH-AOP, FH-POP, SN-AOP, and SN-POP were compared between both groups using model-based ANOVA F tests and quantile regressions. The differences in means between the groups came to 1.3° ± 5.1 (FH-AOP), 1.8° ± 4.6 (FH-POP), 2.6° ± 5.3 (SN-AOP), and 5.5° ± 4.4 (SN-POP). In the ANOVA, angles SN-AOP, FH-POP, and SN-POP differed significantly between the groups ( = 0.041, = 0.006, < 0.001, respectively). Quantile regressions showed significant between-group differences for FH-AOP (lower quartile, = 0.012), FH-POP (upper quartile, = 0.006), SN-AOP (median, = 0.004; upper quartile, = 0.011), and SN-POP (all 3 quartiles, < 0.001). Distinct occlusal plane inclinations of mixed dentitions represent diagnostic traits. Longitudinal and interventional data are needed if therapeutic flattening of mixed dentition AOP or POP is beneficial in treating skeletal class II, same as their steepening in skeletal class III. Our clinical hypothesis suggests alterations by approximately 3° (AOP) and 6° (POP) but requires further study and confirmation.
研究混合牙列期骨骼Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类患者前牙合平面(AOP)和后牙合平面(POP)的矢状倾斜度是否存在差异。对61例骨骼Ⅱ类儿童和60例骨骼Ⅲ类儿童(平均年龄8.4±1.5岁)的横断面侧位头影测量X线片数据进行回顾性分析。我们测量了AOP和POP相对于法兰克福平面(FH)和蝶鞍-鼻根线(SN)的倾斜度。使用基于模型的方差分析F检验和分位数回归比较两组之间的FH-AOP、FH-POP、SN-AOP和SN-POP角度。两组之间的均值差异分别为1.3°±5.1(FH-AOP)、1.8°±4.6(FH-POP)、2.6°±5.3(SN-AOP)和5.5°±4.4(SN-POP)。在方差分析中,两组之间的SN-AOP、FH-POP和SN-POP角度存在显著差异(分别为P = 0.041、P = 0.006、P < 0.001)。分位数回归显示,FH-AOP(下四分位数,P = 0.012)、FH-POP(上四分位数,P = 0.006)、SN-AOP(中位数,P = 0.004;上四分位数,P = 0.011)和SN-POP(所有三个四分位数,P < 0.001)在组间存在显著差异。混合牙列不同的牙合平面倾斜度代表诊断特征。如果混合牙列AOP或POP的治疗性变平对治疗骨骼Ⅱ类有益,与骨骼Ⅲ类中使其变陡一样,需要纵向和干预性数据。我们的临床假设表明变化约为3°(AOP)和6°(POP),但需要进一步研究和证实。