Kamao Hiroyuki, Goto Katsutoshi, Mizukawa Kenichi, Hiraki Ryutaro, Miki Atsushi, Kimura Shuhei
Department of Ophthalmology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki 701-0192, Japan.
Shirai Eye Hospital, 1339 Takasecho Kamitakase, Mitoyo 767-0001, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 20;14(18):6637. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186637.
: To compare the treatment outcomes of intravitreal faricimab (IVF) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), stratified by the presence or absence of punctate hyperfluorescence (PH). : This retrospective study included 301 treatment-naïve patients with nAMD who underwent either IVF or IVA. After 1:1 propensity score matching based on baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), age, and PH status, 56 eyes (28 per group) were analyzed within each PH subgroup. Outcome measures included BCVA, central retinal thickness (CRT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and no retinal fluid rate during the loading dose regimen, and the retreatment rate after the loading dose regimen. The prespecified primary endpoint was the 1-year retreatment rate after completion of the loading dose regimen, analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. Comparisons were performed separately between the PH and non-PH groups. : In the PH group, no significant differences were observed between IVF and IVA groups in terms of BCVA, CRT, SFCT, no retinal fluid rate, or retreatment rate at any time point. In the non-PH group, IVF and IVA groups showed no significant differences in BCVA, CRT, or SFCT at any time point; however, the IVF group achieved a significantly higher no retinal fluid rate (100.0% vs. 64.3%, < 0.001) and a lower retreatment rate at 1 year (71.4% vs. 92.9%, = 0.004) than the IVA group. : IVF and IVA showed comparable efficacy in nAMD with PH. In contrast, IVF demonstrated superior anatomical outcomes in nAMD without PH. These retrospective findings suggest distinct pathophysiological mechanisms between PH and non-PH subtypes.
为比较玻璃体内注射法西单抗(IVF)和玻璃体内注射阿柏西普(IVA)在初治新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)患者中的治疗效果,并根据有无点状高荧光(PH)进行分层。:这项回顾性研究纳入了301例接受IVF或IVA治疗的初治nAMD患者。在根据基线最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、年龄和PH状态进行1:1倾向评分匹配后,对每个PH亚组中的56只眼(每组28只)进行分析。观察指标包括BCVA、中心视网膜厚度(CRT)、黄斑下脉络膜厚度(SFCT)、负荷剂量方案期间无视网膜液的比例,以及负荷剂量方案后的再治疗率。预先设定的主要终点是负荷剂量方案完成后的1年再治疗率,通过Kaplan-Meier曲线和对数秩检验进行分析。在PH组和非PH组之间分别进行比较。:在PH组中,IVF组和IVA组在任何时间点的BCVA、CRT、SFCT、无视网膜液比例或再治疗率方面均未观察到显著差异。在非PH组中,IVF组和IVA组在任何时间点的BCVA、CRT或SFCT方面均未显示出显著差异;然而,IVF组的无视网膜液比例显著高于IVA组(100.0%对64.3%,<0.001),且1年时的再治疗率低于IVA组(71.4%对92.9%,=0.004)。:IVF和IVA在伴有PH的nAMD中显示出相当的疗效。相比之下,IVF在不伴有PH的nAMD中显示出更好的解剖学结果。这些回顾性研究结果表明PH和非PH亚型之间存在不同的病理生理机制。