Suppr超能文献

牙髓治疗开髓洞形设计如何影响上颌前磨牙的生物力学?一项有限元分析研究。

How does endodontic access cavity design affect the biomechanics of a maxillary premolar?? a finite element analysis study.

作者信息

Uslu Gülşah, Arıcan Burçin, Gündoğar Mustafa, Özyürek Taha

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Istanbul, Turkey.

School of Dental Medicine, Department of Endodontics, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Sep 26;25(1):1439. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06769-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different endodontic access cavity designs on biomechanical properties of endodontically treated maxillary premolars under various static loads by finite element analysis method.

METHODS

Based on cone beam computed tomography data of maxillary first premolar, the models of endodontically treated teeth with traditional access cavity (TEC-I), traditional access cavity with Class-II mesio-occlusal cavity design (TEC-II), conventional access cavity (CEC), ninja access cavity (NEC), caries-driven access cavity (Cd-EC), buccal access cavity (BEC) and bucco-occlusal access cavity (BOEC). Three different static loads which were single-point vertical load (Static I), multi-point vertical load (Static II) and multi-point oblique load (Static III) were applied. The stress distribution and maximum Von Misses stress values were recorded.

RESULTS

For the enamel surface, the stress concentration was seen around the central fossa in Static I, on the marginal edge and palatal tubercle in Static II, and on the palatal cusp tip in Static III loads. For the dentin surface, the stress concentration was observed on pericervical area and buccal root surface in Static I, on all around the root surface in Static II, and on buccal and palatal root surfaces and furcation area in Static III loads. While the minimum stress distribution was detected in control group, followed by NEC and CEC designs, the maximum stress distribution was generally monitored in Cd-EC and TEC-II cavity designs.

CONCLUSION

The increased tissue loss in maxillary premolars due to endodontic access cavity preparation meant the higher stress distribution on the tooth surface.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过有限元分析方法评估不同开髓腔设计对经根管治疗的上颌前磨牙在各种静态载荷下生物力学性能的影响。

方法

基于上颌第一前磨牙的锥形束计算机断层扫描数据,建立了具有传统开髓腔(TEC-I)、带有II类近中咬合面洞型设计的传统开髓腔(TEC-II)、常规开髓腔(CEC)、忍者开髓腔(NEC)、龋源性开髓腔(Cd-EC)、颊侧开髓腔(BEC)和颊-咬合面开髓腔(BOEC)的根管治疗牙齿模型。施加三种不同的静态载荷,即单点垂直载荷(静态I)、多点垂直载荷(静态II)和多点斜向载荷(静态III)。记录应力分布和最大冯·米塞斯应力值。

结果

对于釉质表面,在静态I载荷下,应力集中出现在中央窝周围;在静态II载荷下,出现在边缘嵴和腭结节处;在静态III载荷下,出现在腭尖处。对于牙本质表面,在静态I载荷下,应力集中出现在颈部区域和颊根表面;在静态II载荷下,出现在牙根表面周围;在静态III载荷下,出现在颊根和腭根表面以及根分叉区域。虽然对照组中检测到最小应力分布,其次是NEC和CEC设计,但最大应力分布通常在Cd-EC和TEC-II开髓腔设计中监测到。

结论

由于根管治疗开髓腔预备导致上颌前磨牙组织损失增加,意味着牙齿表面应力分布更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验