• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新疆维吾尔自治区脓毒症的流行病学及预后危险因素:一项多中心前瞻性横断面调查

[Epidemiology and prognostic risk factors of sepsis in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional survey].

作者信息

Li Wenzhe, Wang Yi, Wang Jingyan, Gulibanumu Husitar, Li Xiang, Zhang Li, Wang Zhengkai, Chai Ruifeng, Yu Xiangyou

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China.

Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Medical Animal Model Research, Urumqi 830054, China. Corresponding author: Yu Xiangyou, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Jul;37(7):664-670. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240411-00330.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240411-00330
PMID:41017181
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of sepsis in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region and the compliance with sepsis diagnosis and treatment guidelines in intensive care unit (ICU) at different levels of hospitals, and to identify the risk factors associated with poor prognosis in patients with sepsis in this region.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted in ICU of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Critical Care Medicine Alliance. The survey period was from 10:00 on January 31, 2024, to 09:59 on February 1, 2024. The patients diagnosed with sepsis admitted to the ICU during the study period were included in the analysis. Data on patient demographics, physiology, microbiology, and treatment protocols were collected, with follow-up until the 28th day after ICU admission or death. Baseline characteristics and treatment information of septic patients across different hospital levels were compared, as well as clinical data of septic patients with different 28-day outcomes. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify risk factors for 28-day death in septic patients.

RESULTS

A total of 77 units of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Critical Care Medicine Alliance from 14 prefectures/cities in Xinjiang participated in the survey. On the survey day, 727 patients were admitted to ICU, of whom 179 (24.6%) were diagnosed with sepsis, and 64 (35.8%) died within 28 days, 115 (64.2%) survived. Among the participating institutions, 33 were tertiary hospitals (42.9%), managing 97 septic cases (54.2%), and 44 were secondary hospitals (57.1%), managing 82 septic cases (45.8%). The lactic acid monitoring rate and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) rate for septic patients in tertiary hospitals were significantly higher than those in secondary hospitals [lactic acid monitoring rate: 92.8% (90/97) vs. 82.9% (68/82), CRRT rate: 17.5% (17/97) vs. 3.7% (3/82), both P < 0.05]. No statistically significant differences were observed between tertiary and secondary hospitals in length of ICU stay or 28-day mortality [length of ICU stay (days): 11.0 (16.0) vs. 10.0 (22.0), 28-day mortality: 35.1% (34/97) vs. 36.6% (30/82), both P > 0.05]. Compared with survivors, non-survivors had higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score and lower Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score. Significant differences were noted in vital signs [heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO)], laboratory markers [red blood cell count (RBC), white blood cell count (WBC), lymphocyte ratio (LYM%), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), total protein (TP), albumin (Alb), pH value, base excess (BE)], and monitoring, diagnosis and treatment information (invasive blood pressure monitoring, mechanical ventilation, CRRT, usage of norepinephrine). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model indicated that body temperature [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.416, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.022-1.961, P = 0.037] and WBC (HR = 1.040, 95%CI was 1.010-1.071, P = 0.009) were independent risk factors for 28-day death in patients with sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sepsis in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region is characterized by a high mortality. In this region, tertiary hospitals demonstrate better compliance with bundled treatment strategies such as lactic acid monitoring and the usage of CRRT compared to secondary hospitals, yet they do not show significant advantages in clinical outcomes. Body temperature and WBC are independent risk factors for 28-day death in patients with sepsis in this region. However, clinicians should still consider the actual situation of patients, along with more optimal early warning indicators and comprehensive system assessments, to identify and prevent risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients.

摘要

目的

调查新疆维吾尔自治区脓毒症的发病率、不同级别医院重症监护病房(ICU)对脓毒症诊疗指南的遵循情况,并确定该地区脓毒症患者预后不良的相关危险因素。

方法

对新疆维吾尔自治区重症医学联盟ICU进行前瞻性横断面调查。调查时间为2024年1月31日10:00至2024年2月1日09:59。纳入研究期间入住ICU且被诊断为脓毒症的患者进行分析。收集患者人口统计学、生理学、微生物学及治疗方案等数据,随访至ICU入院后第28天或死亡。比较不同医院级别脓毒症患者的基线特征和治疗信息,以及不同28天结局的脓毒症患者的临床资料。采用多因素Cox比例风险模型确定脓毒症患者28天死亡的危险因素。

结果

新疆维吾尔自治区重症医学联盟来自新疆14个地/市的77个单位参与了调查。调查当日,727例患者入住ICU,其中179例(24.6%)被诊断为脓毒症,64例(35.8%)在28天内死亡,115例(64.2%)存活。参与机构中,三级医院33家(42.9%),管理脓毒症病例97例(54.2%);二级医院44家(57.1%),管理脓毒症病例82例(45.8%)。三级医院脓毒症患者的乳酸监测率和连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)率显著高于二级医院[乳酸监测率:92.8%(90/97)对82.9%(68/82),CRRT率:17.5%(17/97)对3.7%(3/82),均P<0.05]。三级医院与二级医院在ICU住院时间或28天死亡率方面无统计学显著差异[ICU住院时间(天):11.0(16.0)对10.0(22.0),28天死亡率:35.1%(34/97)对36.6%(30/82),均P>0.05]。与存活者相比,非存活者的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评分更高,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分更低。在生命体征[心率、血压、体温、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO)]、实验室指标[红细胞计数(RBC)、白细胞计数(WBC)、淋巴细胞比例(LYM%)、血尿素氮(BUN)、总蛋白(TP)、白蛋白(Alb)、pH值、碱剩余(BE)]以及监测、诊断和治疗信息(有创血压监测、机械通气、CRRT、去甲肾上腺素使用情况)方面存在显著差异。多因素Cox比例风险模型表明,体温[风险比(HR)=1.416,95%置信区间(95%CI)为1.022 - 1.961,P = 0.037]和WBC(HR = 1.040,95%CI为1.010 - 1.071,P = 0.009)是脓毒症患者28天死亡的独立危险因素。

结论

新疆维吾尔自治区脓毒症的特点是死亡率高。该地区三级医院与二级医院相比,在乳酸监测和CRRT使用等集束化治疗策略方面遵循情况更好,但在临床结局方面未显示出显著优势。体温和WBC是该地区脓毒症患者28天死亡的独立危险因素。然而,临床医生仍应结合患者实际情况,以及更优化的早期预警指标和全面的系统评估,来识别和预防患者不良结局的危险因素。

相似文献

1
[Epidemiology and prognostic risk factors of sepsis in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional survey].新疆维吾尔自治区脓毒症的流行病学及预后危险因素:一项多中心前瞻性横断面调查
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Jul;37(7):664-670. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240411-00330.
2
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
3
[Predictive value of norepinephrine equivalence score on the 28-day death risk in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study].去甲肾上腺素等效评分对脓毒症患者28天死亡风险的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Apr;37(4):331-336. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240413-00341.
4
[Predictive value of plasma exosome count for the prognosis in septic patients].[血浆外泌体计数对脓毒症患者预后的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Jul;36(7):687-692. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230717-00529.
5
[Feasibility and prognostic value of estimated plasma volume status in assessing volume status during early fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis].[估计血浆容量状态在评估脓毒症患者早期液体复苏期间容量状态中的可行性及预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Jul;37(7):620-627. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240729-00641.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
[Prognostic evaluation and risk factors analysis of septic right ventricular dysfunction based on bedside ultrasound].基于床旁超声的感染性右心室功能障碍的预后评估及危险因素分析
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Jul;37(7):638-643. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20250204-00097.
8
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
9
Novel insights and clinical perception of the patients with acute leukemia transferred to ICU: a multi-center retrospective study spanning 10 years.转入重症监护病房的急性白血病患者的新见解和临床认知:一项为期10年的多中心回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Oct 27;12:1657610. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1657610. eCollection 2025.
10
[Prognostic value of difference between hematocrit and albumin in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者血细胞比容与白蛋白差值的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Jul;37(7):633-637. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20250311-00234.