Suppr超能文献

精神病学中迷幻剂辅助治疗的伦理问题:一项系统的范围综述。

Ethical issues with psychedelic-assisted treatments in psychiatry: A systematic scoping review.

作者信息

Caporuscio Chiara, Poppe Christopher, Gieselmann Astrid, Repantis Dimitris

机构信息

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany.

Centre for Philosophy and AI Research PAIR, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2025 Sep 29;55:e284. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725101761.

Abstract

Based on promising preliminary results from clinical trials, it seems likely that psychedelic substances (classic serotonergic psychedelics, such as psilocybin, and entactogens, such as MDMA) will be introduced into psychiatry as psychedelic-assisted therapy. This also raises a range of ethical questions that urgently need to be addressed before widespread roll-out in society. This scoping review fills a gap in the literature by providing an overview of these ethical issues using a systematic search, presentation, and descriptive analysis of ethical issues in psychedelic-assisted treatments. It includes peer-reviewed studies pertaining to human study participants and psychiatric patients (population), which discuss ethical issues (concept) of psychedelic treatments (context) in clinical trials and other clinical applications. The systematic search included several databases: MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, HeinOnline, and PsycArticles. The search strategy, including all identified keywords and index terms, was adapted for each included database. The search was completed in June 2025 and studies published until then in any language were included. After an iterative process of inductive and deductive coding of ethical issues, the scoping review comprises seven themes related to the ethics of psychedelic-assisted treatments: (1) safety and patient well-being, (2) therapeutic relationships, (3) informed consent, (4) equity and access, (5) research ethics, (6) special contexts, and (7) societal and cultural implications. The results can be used to inform and stimulate further discussion and in-depth research on the ethics of psychedelic-assisted treatments, possibly leading to more nuanced debate surrounding a safer and more ethical implementation of psychedelic-assisted treatments in the future.

摘要

基于临床试验有前景的初步结果,迷幻物质(经典的血清素能迷幻剂,如裸盖菇素,以及触觉致幻剂,如摇头丸)似乎很有可能作为迷幻辅助疗法被引入精神病学领域。这也引发了一系列伦理问题,在社会广泛推广之前迫切需要加以解决。本范围综述通过对迷幻辅助治疗中的伦理问题进行系统检索、呈现和描述性分析,填补了文献中的空白。它包括与人类研究参与者和精神科患者(人群)相关的同行评审研究,这些研究讨论了临床试验及其他临床应用中迷幻治疗(背景)的伦理问题(概念)。系统检索包括几个数据库:医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycInfo)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、HeinOnline数据库和心理学文章数据库(PsycArticles)。检索策略,包括所有确定的关键词和索引词,针对每个纳入的数据库进行了调整。检索于2025年6月完成,纳入了截至当时以任何语言发表的研究。经过对伦理问题进行归纳和演绎编码的迭代过程,本范围综述包含了与迷幻辅助治疗伦理相关的七个主题:(1)安全性与患者福祉,(2)治疗关系,(3)知情同意,(4)公平与可及性,(5)研究伦理,(6)特殊背景,以及(7)社会和文化影响。这些结果可用于为关于迷幻辅助治疗伦理的进一步讨论和深入研究提供信息并激发讨论,可能会在未来围绕更安全、更符合伦理的迷幻辅助治疗实施引发更细致入微的辩论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验