Suppr超能文献

通过传统脱落细胞学检查和液基细胞学检查对HIV阳性女性进行宫颈癌筛查。

Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-Positive Women by Conventional Exfoliative Cytology and Liquid-Based Cytology.

作者信息

Rai Himani, Verma Deepshikha, Meena Ravi, Uniya Upasana, Nagayach Neelesh

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi, Varanasi, IND.

Department of Pathology, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Government Medical College, Vidisha, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):e91118. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91118. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background Cervical cancer remains a significant public health challenge, particularly among women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), due to their increased vulnerability to persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. Early detection through effective screening methods such as conventional exfoliative cytology (CEC) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) can substantially reduce the burden of cervical cancer in this population. Objective In view of the combined burden of HIV infection and cervical cancer in India, the current study aims at screening for cervical cancer in HIV-positive women attending anti-retroviral therapy (ART) centers by conventional Pap smear and LBC and also compares the results of conventional exfoliative cytology to liquid-based cytology in Gandhi Medical College and Associated Hospitals, Bhopal. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted on HIV-positive women attending a tertiary care center. Cervical samples were collected and analyzed using both CEC and LBC techniques. The results were evaluated based on cytological abnormalities, sample adequacy, and detection rates of precancerous lesions. Data were statistically analyzed to determine the comparative effectiveness of these two methods. Results Of the 250 HIV-positive women screened using conventional exfoliative cytology, epithelial abnormalities were detected in 25 (10.0%) cases. LBC demonstrated superior sample adequacy, with 230 out of 250 samples (92%) being satisfactory, compared to 200 out of 250 samples (80%) in CEC. Additionally, LBC showed higher sensitivity in detecting epithelial abnormalities, with 29 out of 29 cases (100.0%) correctly identified, compared to 25 out of 29 cases (86.2%) detected by CEC. Both methods demonstrated high specificity, with LBC identifying 221 out of 225 true negatives (98.2%) and CEC identifying 225 out of 225 true negatives (100.0%). Conclusion Liquid-based cytology is more effective than conventional exfoliative cytology in cervical cancer screening among HIV-positive women due to its higher sensitivity and better sample adequacy. Incorporating LBC into routine screening protocols for high-risk populations, such as HIV-positive women, could enhance early detection and improve clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

宫颈癌仍然是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,尤其是在感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的女性中,因为她们更容易持续感染人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)。通过常规脱落细胞学检查(CEC)和液基细胞学检查(LBC)等有效筛查方法进行早期检测,可大幅减轻该人群的宫颈癌负担。目的:鉴于印度HIV感染和宫颈癌的综合负担,本研究旨在通过传统巴氏涂片和LBC对在抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)中心就诊的HIV阳性女性进行宫颈癌筛查,并比较甘地医学院及博帕尔相关医院中常规脱落细胞学检查与液基细胞学检查的结果。方法:本横断面研究针对在一家三级医疗中心就诊的HIV阳性女性开展。收集宫颈样本并使用CEC和LBC技术进行分析。根据细胞学异常、样本充足性和癌前病变检出率对结果进行评估。对数据进行统计学分析以确定这两种方法的比较有效性。结果:在250名使用常规脱落细胞学检查进行筛查的HIV阳性女性中,25例(10.0%)检测到上皮异常。LBC显示出更高的样本充足性,250个样本中有230个(92%)令人满意,而CEC在250个样本中只有200个(80%)令人满意。此外,LBC在检测上皮异常方面显示出更高的敏感性,29例中有29例(100.0%)被正确识别,而CEC在29例中仅检测到25例(86.2%)。两种方法均显示出高特异性,LBC在225个真阴性中识别出221个(98.2%),CEC在225个真阴性中识别出225个(100.0%)。结论:液基细胞学检查在HIV阳性女性宫颈癌筛查中比常规脱落细胞学检查更有效,因为其敏感性更高且样本充足性更好。将LBC纳入HIV阳性女性等高风险人群的常规筛查方案中,可提高早期检测率并改善临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b75b/12466834/83a5aefa34ea/cureus-0017-00000091118-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验