Suppr超能文献

既往冠状动脉旁路移植术对急性心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Impact of Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Lokesh Mullapudi, Postoev Anastasia, Alsarkhi Loiy Naser, Aqel Yousef, Gillani Iman, Ahzam Rana M, Wei Calvin R, Ali Neelum

机构信息

Medicine and Surgery, Gomel State Medical University, Gomel, BLR.

Internal Medicine, Caribbean Medical University, Willemstad, CUW.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Sep 15;17(9):e92383. doi: 10.7759/cureus.92383. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on clinical outcomes in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from January 2010 to August 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Observational studies comparing outcomes between patients with AMI with and without prior CABG history were included. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Statistical analyses employed random-effects models using RevMan 5.4 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) and R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Nine studies comprising patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis demonstrated that previous CABG history was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality in the overall AMI population (relative risk (RR): 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-1.16), although considerable heterogeneity was observed (I² = 87%). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with STEMI with prior CABG had a 16% higher mortality risk compared to CABG-naïve patients (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.12-1.20), while patients with NSTEMI showed a non-significant 6% increase (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95-1.19). No significant difference was found in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between groups (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.85-1.12). Meta-regression identified age, hypertension prevalence, and CABG prevalence as significant contributors to between-study heterogeneity. These findings suggest that prior CABG may confer increased mortality risk specifically in patients with STEMI, although limited study numbers in subgroup analyses warrant cautious interpretation and highlight the need for larger targeted investigations.

摘要

本系统评价和荟萃分析探讨了既往冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者临床结局的影响。按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,于2010年1月至2025年8月在PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)和Web of Science中进行了全面的文献检索。纳入了比较有和没有既往CABG病史的AMI患者结局的观察性研究。两名独立的评审员使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行研究选择、数据提取和质量评估。统计分析采用随机效应模型,使用RevMan 5.4(丹麦哥本哈根北欧Cochrane中心)和R软件(奥地利维也纳R统计计算基金会)。最终分析纳入了9项包含ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的研究。汇总分析表明,在总体AMI人群中,既往CABG病史与全因死亡率无显著相关性(相对风险(RR):1.06,95%置信区间(CI):0.97-1.16),尽管观察到相当大的异质性(I² = 87%)。亚组分析显示,既往有CABG的STEMI患者的死亡风险比未行CABG的患者高16%(RR:1.16,95%CI:1.12-1.20),而NSTEMI患者的死亡风险无显著增加6%(RR:1.06,95%CI:0.95-1.19)。两组之间在主要不良心脏事件(MACE)方面未发现显著差异(RR:0.98,95%CI:0.85-1.12)。Meta回归确定年龄、高血压患病率和CABG患病率是研究间异质性的重要因素。这些发现表明,既往CABG可能特别增加STEMI患者的死亡风险,尽管亚组分析中的研究数量有限,需要谨慎解释,并强调需要进行更大规模的针对性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c5/12527220/0216d3ae041a/cureus-0017-00000092383-i01.jpg

相似文献

2
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3.
3
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
9
Prophylactic lidocaine for myocardial infarction.用于心肌梗死的预防性利多卡因。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 21;2015(8):CD008553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008553.pub2.

本文引用的文献

10
A Guide for Systematic Reviews: PRISMA.系统评价指南:PRISMA
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;57(1):57-58. doi: 10.5152/tao.2019.4058. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验