Campos Tatiane Vacaro, Bento Ricardo Ferreira, Oticica Jeanne, Jabour Maíra Said, Távora Nathália, Jardim Isabela, de Marchi Cristiane Leite, Tsuji Robinson Koji
Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Oct 16;29(4):1-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1810028. eCollection 2025 Oct.
Tinnitus is a prevalent symptom and has no proven effective treatment. Clinical observations that some patients reported significantly improved tinnitus after topical ear drop administration of lidocaine motivated research on this drug.
Evaluate the action of topical intra-auricular 10% lidocaine in suppressing tinnitus compared to placebo.
This was a randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The variations of the visual analog scale (VAS), tinnitus loudness, and the minimum masking level (MML) after intra-auricular lidocaine 10% were compared with a placebo. The same variables were compared with some sample features.
There was no statistically significant difference between the action of lidocaine and placebo in tinnitus variation measured by VAS (p = 0.361), tinnitus loudness (p = 0.850), and MML. (p = 0.213). The VAS variation was statistically lower in patients with any hearing loss (p = 0.005); the tinnitus loudness variation was higher in patients with tinnitus modulation (p = 0.049) and lower in patients with any hearing loss (p = 0.045). The MML variation was lower in patients with bruxism/TMD (p = 0.026).
In this study the action of lidocaine on the variation of tinnitus intensity was similar to placebo. We believe that the use of manipulated medication may have interfered in the outcome and that the large number of patients with positive response to placebo should be investigated in further studies.
耳鸣是一种常见症状,尚无经证实的有效治疗方法。一些患者报告称局部滴注利多卡因后耳鸣明显改善,这一临床观察推动了对该药物的研究。
评估与安慰剂相比,局部耳内使用10%利多卡因对耳鸣的抑制作用。
这是一项随机、交叉、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验。将10%耳内利多卡因使用后视觉模拟量表(VAS)、耳鸣响度和最小掩蔽级(MML)的变化与安慰剂进行比较。将相同变量与一些样本特征进行比较。
利多卡因与安慰剂在通过VAS测量的耳鸣变化(p = 0.361)、耳鸣响度(p = 0.850)和MML方面(p = 0.213)的作用无统计学显著差异。在任何听力损失的患者中,VAS变化在统计学上较低(p = 0.005);耳鸣调制患者的耳鸣响度变化较高(p = 0.049),而任何听力损失患者的耳鸣响度变化较低(p = 0.045)。磨牙症/颞下颌关节紊乱患者的MML变化较低(p = 0.026)。
在本研究中,利多卡因对耳鸣强度变化的作用与安慰剂相似。我们认为使用的药物操作可能干扰了结果,并且安慰剂有阳性反应的大量患者应在进一步研究中进行调查。