• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用允许脑灌注压≤60 mmHg的管理方案的成年重度创伤性脑损伤患者的结局——一项为期10年的回顾性研究

Outcome in adult patients with severe TBI, using a management protocol allowing a cerebral perfusion pressure ≤ 60 mmHg - a retrospective study over 10 years.

作者信息

Réen Linus, Radman Anna, Visse Edward, Cederberg David, Marklund Niklas, Siesjö Peter

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Neurosurgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Oct 23;167(1):278. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06701-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-025-06701-6
PMID:41128918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12549425/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for the treatment of severe TBI recommend maintaining a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) at 60-70 mmHg. In our institution, as well as others, an alternative algorithm-originally named the Lund concept-has been used. This treatment algorithm employs metoprolol and clonidine to limit CPP, accepting levels below 60 mmHg, with the aim of reducing cerebral edema. Previous reports on this algorithm have shown promising outcome in severe TBI cohorts when compared with many contemporary practices; however, no population-based studies have been conducted to validate these findings.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the outcome in adult severe TBI using the Lund Concept algorithm in a population-based cohort and how are CPP levels lower than 60 mmHg tolerated?

METHODS

The study included 135 evaluable adult patients out of 171 admitted with severe TBI over a ten-year period in the southern Swedish healthcare region. Baseline data, intracranial pressure (ICP), CPP, treatment duration, surgical interventions, and administered drugs were correlated to the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE).

RESULTS

The 30-day and 6-month mortality rates were 16% and 20%, respectively. A favorable outcome (GOSE 5-8) was achieved in 48% of patients. Only increasing age was associated with inferior outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The use of a management protocol accepting lower CPP levels than those recommended in existing guidelines was generally well tolerated with outcome in line with comparable reports.

摘要

背景

目前重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的治疗指南建议将脑灌注压(CPP)维持在60 - 70 mmHg。在我们机构以及其他一些机构,一种替代算法——最初名为隆德概念——已被采用。该治疗算法使用美托洛尔和可乐定来限制CPP,接受低于60 mmHg的水平,目的是减轻脑水肿。此前关于该算法的报告显示,与许多当代治疗方法相比,在重度TBI队列中取得了有前景的结果;然而,尚未进行基于人群的研究来验证这些发现。

研究问题

在基于人群的队列中,使用隆德概念算法治疗成人重度TBI的结果如何,以及如何耐受低于60 mmHg的CPP水平?

方法

该研究纳入了瑞典南部医疗保健区域在十年期间收治的171例重度TBI成人患者中的135例可评估患者。将基线数据、颅内压(ICP)、CPP、治疗持续时间、手术干预和所用药物与扩展格拉斯哥预后量表(GOSE)进行关联分析。

结果

30天和6个月死亡率分别为16%和20%。48%的患者获得了良好预后(GOSE 5 - 8)。仅年龄增加与较差的预后相关。

结论

采用一种接受低于现有指南推荐水平的CPP的管理方案总体耐受性良好,其结果与类似报告一致。

相似文献

1
Outcome in adult patients with severe TBI, using a management protocol allowing a cerebral perfusion pressure ≤ 60 mmHg - a retrospective study over 10 years.采用允许脑灌注压≤60 mmHg的管理方案的成年重度创伤性脑损伤患者的结局——一项为期10年的回顾性研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Oct 23;167(1):278. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06701-6.
2
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Cerebral perfusion pressure targets after traumatic brain injury: a reappraisal.创伤性脑损伤后的脑灌注压目标:重新评估
Crit Care. 2025 May 21;29(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05458-9.
5
Elevation of the head during intensive care management in people with severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患者在重症监护管理期间抬高床头。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):CD009986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009986.pub2.
6
Visualizations of autoregulatory insults in moderate-to-severe paediatric traumatic brain injury: a secondary analysis from the multicentre STARSHIP trial.中重度小儿创伤性脑损伤中自动调节损伤的可视化:多中心STARSHIP试验的二次分析
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 4;29(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05568-4.
7
Revisiting the oxygen reactivity index in traumatic brain injury: the complementary value of combined focal and global autoregulation monitoring.重新审视创伤性脑损伤中的氧反应性指数:联合局部和整体自动调节监测的互补价值。
Crit Care. 2025 Jan 12;29(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05261-6.
8
Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Brain Injury: Physiological Relationships and Outcome.脑损伤中的最佳脑灌注压:生理关系与预后
Neurosurgery. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003411.
9
The effects of cerebral pressure autoregulation status and CPP levels on cerebral metabolism in pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤中脑压力自动调节状态和脑灌注压水平对脑代谢的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Apr 24;166(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06085-z.
10
Focal brain oxygen, blood flow, and intracranial pressure measurements in relation to optimal cerebral perfusion pressure.与最佳脑灌注压相关的局部脑氧、血流和颅内压测量。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Nov 17;140(5):1423-1433. doi: 10.3171/2023.8.JNS231519. Print 2024 May 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Restrictive vs Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: The TRAIN Randomized Clinical Trial.急性颅脑损伤患者的限制性与开放性输血策略:TRAiN 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Nov 19;332(19):1623-1633. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.20424.
2
Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的自由输血策略或限制输血策略。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Aug 22;391(8):722-735. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2404360. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
3
Improvement in Functional Outcome from 6 to 12 Months After Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Is Frequent, But May Not Be Detected With the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended.中度和重度创伤性脑损伤后6至12个月功能结局常有改善,但使用扩展格拉斯哥结局量表可能无法检测到。
Neurotrauma Rep. 2024 Feb 29;5(1):139-149. doi: 10.1089/neur.2023.0109. eCollection 2024.
4
The pressure reactivity index as a measure of cerebral autoregulation and its application in traumatic brain injury management.作为脑自动调节指标的压力反应性指数及其在创伤性脑损伤管理中的应用。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Dec 14;25(4):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.10.009. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Time spent above optimal cerebral perfusion pressure is not associated with failure to improve in outcome in traumatic brain injury.高于最佳脑灌注压的时间与创伤性脑损伤患者预后改善失败无关。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023 Dec 14;11(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00579-3.
6
Intracranial pressure monitoring with and without brain tissue oxygen pressure monitoring for severe traumatic brain injury in France (OXY-TC): an open-label, randomised controlled superiority trial.法国颅脑创伤患者颅内压监测与脑组织氧压监测(OXY-TC):一项开放标签、随机对照优效性试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 Nov;22(11):1005-1014. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00290-9.
7
Hospitalisations and in-hospital deaths following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in Australia, 2015-20: a registry data analysis for the Australian Traumatic Brain Injury National Data (ATBIND) project.澳大利亚 2015-20 年中度至重度创伤性脑损伤后的住院和院内死亡:澳大利亚创伤性脑损伤国家数据 (ATBIND) 项目的登记数据分析。
Med J Aust. 2023 Oct 2;219(7):316-324. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52055. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
8
An independently validated nomogram for individualised estimation of short-term mortality risk among patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a modelling analysis of the CENTER-TBI China Registry Study.一种经独立验证的用于个体化评估重型颅脑损伤患者短期死亡风险的列线图:CENTER-TBI中国注册研究的建模分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Apr 28;59:101975. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101975. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Comparison of the predictive value of the Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores in predicting 6-month outcomes in patients with blunt traumatic brain injuries.比较赫尔辛基、鹿特丹和斯德哥尔摩 CT 评分在预测钝性颅脑损伤患者 6 个月结局中的预测价值。
Chin J Traumatol. 2023 Nov;26(6):357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
10
Prognostic Value of CRASH and IMPACT Models for Predicting Mortality and Unfavorable Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.CRASH和IMPACT模型对预测创伤性脑损伤死亡率和不良结局的预后价值;一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 4;11(1):e27. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1885. eCollection 2023.