• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院收费的差异:心脏手术成本效益评估中的一个问题。

The variation in hospital charges: a problem in determining cost/benefit for cardiac surgery.

作者信息

Marty A T, Matar A F, Danielson R, O'Reilly R

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1977 Nov;24(5):409-16. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63433-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63433-9
PMID:411431
Abstract

Based on 417 itemized bills from 45 American hospitals that responded to a randomized, geographically stratified survey covering January to June, 1976, the middle 50% of hospital charges for cardiac operations ranged between $5,914 and $10,315. Nonitemizing hospitals submitted lower, but less accurate, estimates. As 60% of the itemized bill consisted of high charge/cost items such as laboratory and pharmacy fees, total charges were not lowered merely by increasing case load or decreasing operating room times. Careful individualization of services in 1 hospital, however, reduced charges up to 16%. Charge per day was a poor index of efficiency because patients staying longer had lower average daily charges. The variation in hospital charges and lack of accounting uniformity preclude meaningful quantitation of either the "typical" charge or the numerator of the cost/benefit ratio for cardiac operations.

摘要

根据45家美国医院对1976年1月至6月进行的一项随机、按地理分层调查的回应所提供的417份明细账单,心脏手术医院收费的中间50%在5914美元至10315美元之间。未提供明细的医院给出的估计值较低,但准确性也较差。由于明细账单的60%由实验室和药房费用等高收费/高成本项目组成,总费用并不会仅仅因为增加病例数量或缩短手术室时间而降低。然而,一家医院对服务进行仔细的个性化安排后,费用降低了16%。每日收费并不是效率的良好指标,因为住院时间较长的患者平均每日收费较低。医院收费的差异以及缺乏会计一致性使得无法对心脏手术的“典型”收费或成本效益比的分子进行有意义的量化。

相似文献

1
The variation in hospital charges: a problem in determining cost/benefit for cardiac surgery.医院收费的差异:心脏手术成本效益评估中的一个问题。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1977 Nov;24(5):409-16. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63433-9.
2
Comparison of analytic approaches for the economic evaluation of new technologies alongside multicenter clinical trials.新技术经济评估的分析方法与多中心临床试验的比较
Am Heart J. 2003 Mar;145(3):452-8. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.3.
3
Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.单节段和双节段腰椎全椎间盘置换术与腰椎环形融合术的费用比较分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2905-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b84ae.
4
Predicting hospital accounting costs.预测医院会计成本。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1989 Fall;11(1):25-33.
5
The risk and cost of coronary angiography. I. Cost of coronary angiography in Washington State.
JAMA. 1979;242(8):731-4.
6
Hospital case mix and average charge per case: an initial study.医院病例组合与每例平均费用:一项初步研究。
Health Serv Res. 1979 Spring;14(1):44-55.
7
The effects of a cost-education program on hospital charges.一项成本教育计划对医院收费的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1987 Sep-Oct;2(5):306-11. doi: 10.1007/BF02596163.
8
Surgonomics: the cost of cholecystectomy.外科经济学:胆囊切除术的成本
Surgery. 1984 Oct;96(4):642-7.
9
Average hospital charges for medical and surgical treatment of back problems: United States, 1993.1993年美国背部疾病医疗及手术治疗的平均住院费用
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1995 Apr-Jun;76(2):26-35.
10
Payment segment differences in hospital and physician charges for inpatient and emergency room procedures: cost shifting?住院和急诊室诊疗项目中医院及医生收费的支付环节差异:成本转嫁?
Health Mark Q. 2010 Apr;27(2):131-44. doi: 10.1080/07359681003745014.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary artery bypass grafting: how much does it cost?冠状动脉搭桥术:费用是多少?
CMAJ. 1992 Jan 15;146(2):163-8.
2
Cost of a cardiac surgical and a general thoracic surgical patient to the National Health Service in a London teaching hospital.伦敦一家教学医院中,心脏外科手术患者和普通胸外科手术患者给国民医疗服务体系带来的成本。
Thorax. 1979 Apr;34(2):249-53. doi: 10.1136/thx.34.2.249.
3
Return to work after coronary artery surgery for angina.冠状动脉搭桥术后因心绞痛而恢复工作。
Br Med J. 1978 Dec 16;2(6153):1680-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6153.1680.