• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下脉冲射频治疗膝关节骨关节炎疼痛的疗效:系统评价与Meta分析

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Management of Pain Caused by Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Lai Shifeng, Li Huimin, Li Jinlian, Ma Yu, Luo Na, Xu Min, Liu Ping, Zhang Hongping, He Qinglan

机构信息

The People's Hospital of Jianyang City, Jianyang, China.

Jinniu District People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2025 Nov;28(6):E631-E644.

PMID:41337758
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent degenerative disease that leads to significant disability among elderly individuals. Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (UG-PRF) has been shown to be a nonpharmacological, less invasive alternative to other treatment methods for reducing severe chronic joint pain.

OBJECTIVE

To establish whether using UG-PRF to manage KOA pain improves short-term and long-term clinical outcomes for patients with that condition.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Within PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, a comprehensive search of relevant studies published from those databases' inception through July 11, 2024, was conducted. Studies assessing the effectiveness of UG-PRF in KOA patients were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria that required the exclusive use of UG for PRF delivery. Data extraction and synthesis utilized a random-effects model to analyze outcomes related to pain reduction and physical function improvement. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to appraise the robustness of the evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 658 records were identified, with 8 studies involving 688 patients included in the meta-analysis. UG-PRF was associated with significant reductions in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at one month (MD = -14.40; 95% CI [-19.61, -9.19]; P < 0.01; GRADE: high), 3 months (MD = -7.83; 95% CI [-10.38, -5.27]; P < 0.01; GRADE: high), 6 months (MD = -5.64; 95% CI [-7.62, -3.66]; P < 0.01; GRADE: high), and 12 months after treatment (MD = -1.08; 95% CI [-1.94, -0.23]; P < 0.01; GRADE: moderate), and those results all exhibited substantial heterogeneity (I² > 90%; P < 0.01). Similarly, secondary outcomes were associated with significant improvements in WOMAC scores at one month (MD = -20.71; 95% CI [-27.43, -13.99]; P < 0.01; GRADE: high) and 3 months after treatment (MD = -22.09; 95% CI [-31.33, -12.84]; P < 0.01; GRADE: high), with high heterogeneity (I² = 77% at one month, 89% at 3 months; P < 0.01). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of results, except for the VAS at 12 months. Subgroup analysis indicated no significant differences across treatment targets (P > 0.05). Publication bias was suggested for VAS outcomes at one and 6 months, yet fail-safe analysis (N = 86 required to nullify the 12-month effect) and trim-and-fill methods maintained the significance of the findings.

LIMITATIONS

Incomplete reporting of WOMAC scores constrain the robustness of the study's conclusions, particularly as far long-term efficacy as is concerned. Additionally, the current study's limited data on nerve regeneration mechanisms after pulsed radiofrequency ablation (RFA) restricts a comprehensive understanding of the factors that contribute to pain recurrence at the 12-month mark.

CONCLUSIONS

UG-PRF effectively reduces KOA pain and improves function in the short term, with significant benefits observed up to 6 months after treatment. However, the analgesic effects diminish by 12 months, highlighting the need for further research into the long-term efficacy and underlying mechanisms of this technique. The meta-analysis supports the clinical application of UG-PRF as a safe, minimally invasive option for managing KOA pain in adults aged >= 40 years (mean 62.1±9.4 years), though sustained pain relief may require additional interventions.

摘要

背景

膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)是一种常见的退行性疾病,会导致老年人出现严重残疾。超声引导下脉冲射频(UG-PRF)已被证明是一种非药物、侵入性较小的替代治疗方法,可减轻严重的慢性关节疼痛。

目的

确定使用UG-PRF治疗KOA疼痛是否能改善该疾病患者的短期和长期临床结局。

研究设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

在PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中,对从这些数据库建立到2024年7月11日发表的相关研究进行了全面检索。根据预先定义的纳入标准选择评估UG-PRF在KOA患者中有效性的研究,该标准要求仅使用超声引导进行PRF治疗。数据提取和合成采用随机效应模型分析与疼痛减轻和身体功能改善相关的结局。我们使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)框架来评估证据的稳健性。

结果

共识别出658条记录,8项研究涉及688例患者纳入荟萃分析。UG-PRF与治疗后1个月(MD = -14.40;95%CI [-19.61, -9.19];P < 0.01;GRADE:高)、3个月(MD = -7.83;95%CI [-10.38, -5.27];P < 0.01;GRADE:高)、6个月(MD = -5.64;95%CI [-7.62, -3.66];P < 0.01;GRADE:高)和12个月时视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的显著降低相关(MD = -1.08;95%CI [-1.94, -0.23];P < 0.01;GRADE:中等),且所有这些结果均表现出高度异质性(I²>90%;P < 0.01)。同样,次要结局与治疗后1个月(MD = -20.71;95%CI [-27.43, -13.99];P < 0.01;GRADE:高)和3个月时WOMAC评分的显著改善相关(MD = -22.09;95%CI [-31.33, -12.84];P < 0.01;GRADE:高),异质性较高(1个月时I² = 77%,3个月时I² = 89%;P < 0.01)。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性,但12个月时的VAS评分除外。亚组分析表明不同治疗靶点之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。1个月和6个月时VAS结局提示存在发表偏倚,但失效安全分析(使12个月效应无效需要N = 86)和修剪填充法维持了研究结果的显著性。

局限性

WOMAC评分报告不完整限制了研究结论的稳健性,尤其是在长期疗效方面。此外,目前关于脉冲射频消融(RFA)后神经再生机制的数据有限,限制了对导致12个月时疼痛复发因素的全面理解。

结论

UG-PRF可有效减轻KOA疼痛并在短期内改善功能,治疗后6个月内观察到显著益处。然而,镇痛效果在12个月时减弱,突出了对该技术长期疗效和潜在机制进行进一步研究的必要性。荟萃分析支持将UG-PRF作为一种安全、微创的选择应用于≥40岁(平均62.1±9.4岁)成人KOA疼痛的管理,尽管持续缓解疼痛可能需要额外的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Management of Pain Caused by Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声引导下脉冲射频治疗膝关节骨关节炎疼痛的疗效:系统评价与Meta分析
Pain Physician. 2025 Nov;28(6):E631-E644.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Treatment for Chronic Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声引导下射频治疗膝骨关节炎慢性疼痛的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Sep 19;2020:2537075. doi: 10.1155/2020/2537075. eCollection 2020.
3
The Comparison of Intraarticular Bipolar Pulsed Radiofrequency and Genicular Nerve Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation for Pain Caused by Osteoarthritis of the Knee.关节内双极脉冲射频与膝状神经热射频消融治疗膝关节骨关节炎疼痛的比较
Pain Physician. 2025 Dec;28(S7):S179-S189.
4
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Pulse Radiofrequency and Fluoroscopy-Guided Intra-Articular Pulse Radiofrequency for Knee Osteoarthritis-Related Pain.超声引导下关节内脉冲射频与透视引导下关节内脉冲射频治疗膝骨关节炎相关疼痛的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Oct;34(10):1194-1199. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.10.1194.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
The Analgesic Effectiveness of Genicular Nerve-targeted Cooled and Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for Osteoarthritis Knee Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.关节内神经靶向冷却脉冲射频消融治疗膝骨关节炎疼痛的镇痛效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2024 Sep;27(7):357-373.
7
Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Osteoarthritis Knee Pain in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下射频消融治疗老年慢性膝骨关节炎疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2024 Mar;27(3):121-128.
8
Comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave, ultrasound, low-level laser therapy, noninvasive interactive neurostimulation, and pulsed radiofrequency treatment for treating plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.体外冲击波、超声、低强度激光治疗、无创交互式神经刺激和脉冲射频治疗足底筋膜炎的比较效果:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(43):e12819. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012819.
9
Comparative Analysis of Short-Term and Long-Term Clinical Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Different Sources in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.不同来源间充质干细胞治疗膝骨关节炎的短期和长期临床疗效比较分析:一项网状Meta分析
Stem Cells Int. 2024 May 31;2024:2741681. doi: 10.1155/2024/2741681. eCollection 2024.
10
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment: Evidence for and Applications in Chronic Pain.脉冲射频治疗:慢性疼痛的证据及应用
Pain Physician. 2025 Nov;28(6):467-481.