Blanc J J, Boschat J, Granatelli D, Germa D, Penther P
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1977 Oct;70(10):1033-8.
The following conclusions have been drawn from a study of 20 cases of total atrio-ventricular block, which were supra-His in 7 cases, intra-His in 4 cases, infra-His in 9 cases, and were with (11 cases) or without (8 cases) recent Stockes-Adams (1 case was excluded): resumption of the basal rhythm after the post-stimulatory pause is slower in cases of infra-His A-V block; automatic discharge from the focus is easily upset by rapid stimulation, whatever the site of the focus (ventricular or junctional); subsidiary foci of stimulation would behave from the electro-physiological standpoint like a sinus focus with reduced autonomy, and deprived of its peripheral zone of physiologically slow conduction; unfortunately electro-physiological investigation of this group does not allow us to separate with confidence those patients who have had Stockes-Adams attacks from those who have not.
对20例完全性房室传导阻滞患者进行研究后得出以下结论:7例希氏束以上阻滞,4例希氏束内阻滞,9例希氏束以下阻滞,其中11例伴有近期斯托克斯-亚当斯综合征(1例排除),8例不伴有近期斯托克斯-亚当斯综合征:希氏束以下房室传导阻滞患者刺激后间歇期基础心律恢复较慢;无论起搏点位于何处(心室或交界区),快速刺激都容易扰乱起搏点的自动放电;从电生理角度来看,辅助起搏点的行为类似于自主性降低且缺乏生理性缓慢传导外周区的窦房结起搏点;遗憾的是,对该组患者进行电生理检查无法可靠地区分曾发生过斯托克斯-亚当斯综合征的患者和未发生过该综合征的患者。