• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors in uncontrolled hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.选择性醛固酮合酶抑制剂治疗未控制高血压的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Hypertens. 2025 Dec 1;31:e41. doi: 10.5646/ch.2025.31.e41. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and safety of aldosterone synthase inhibitors for uncontrolled hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and systematic review.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 22;16:1664810. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1664810. eCollection 2025.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.醛固酮合酶抑制剂治疗高血压的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Sep;8(5):e70094. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70094.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Lorundrostat in Uncontrolled and/or Treatment Resistant Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.洛伦司他在未控制和/或难治性高血压中的疗效与安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2025 Nov;32(6):599-615. doi: 10.1007/s40292-025-00742-9. Epub 2025 Oct 17.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Lorundrostat in Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.洛伦德司他在未控制高血压中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Sep;27(9):e70155. doi: 10.1111/jch.70155.
7
Efficacy and safety of aldosterone synthase inhibitors in hypertension: A systematic review and meta- analysis.醛固酮合酶抑制剂在高血压中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Dec;49(12):102875. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102875. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
8
Efficacy and safety of lorundrostat in uncontrolled hypertension: a meta-analysis.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Nov 18. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04726-3.
9
Efficacy and safety of lorundrostat in patients with uncontrolled or resistant hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
Vascul Pharmacol. 2025 Dec;161:107550. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2025.107550. Epub 2025 Oct 9.
10
Comparative efficacy and safety of aldosterone synthase inhibitors in hypertension: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled rials.醛固酮合酶抑制剂治疗高血压的疗效与安全性比较:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Open Heart. 2025 Oct 15;12(2):e003535. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003535.

本文引用的文献

1
The Emerging Role of Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors in Overcoming Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Therapy Limitations: A Narrative Review.醛固酮合酶抑制剂在克服肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统治疗局限性方面的新作用:一项叙述性综述
Card Fail Rev. 2025 Aug 18;11:e20. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2025.09. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Baxdrostat in Uncontrolled and Resistant Hypertension.巴多司他治疗未控制及难治性高血压的疗效与安全性
N Engl J Med. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2507109.
3
Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Resistant Hypertension: Pharmacological Insights - A Systematic Review.用于顽固性高血压的醛固酮合成酶抑制剂:药理学见解——一项系统评价
Drugs. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s40265-025-02229-2.
4
Lorundrostat in Participants With Uncontrolled Hypertension and Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: The Launch-HTN Randomized Clinical Trial.洛伦德司他用于未控制高血压和顽固性高血压患者:Launch-HTN随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.9413.
5
Lorundrostat Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension.洛伦德司他对血压控制不佳患者的疗效与安全性
N Engl J Med. 2025 May 8;392(18):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2501440. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
6
Role and application prospective of non-steroidal MRA in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease.非甾体类盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂在糖尿病肾病治疗中的作用及应用前景
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Mar 23. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04456-8.
7
Assessment of Blood Pressure Control Status Among Hypertensive Patients Attending Rwandan District Hospital NCD Clinics: A Retrospective Follow-Up Study.卢旺达地区医院非传染性疾病诊所高血压患者血压控制状况评估:一项回顾性随访研究
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2025 Feb 3;15(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s44197-025-00356-3.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Review.醛固酮合成酶抑制剂治疗高血压的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析及系统评价
Hypertension. 2025 Apr;82(4):e47-e56. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23962. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
9
Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors for Cardiorenal Protection: Ready for Prime Time?用于心肾保护的醛固酮合酶抑制剂:准备好进入黄金时代了吗?
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2024;49(1):1041-1056. doi: 10.1159/000542621. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
10
The potential for improving cardio-renal outcomes in chronic kidney disease with the aldosterone synthase inhibitor vicadrostat (BI 690517): a rationale for the EASi-KIDNEY trial.醛固酮合酶抑制剂维卡司他(BI 690517)改善慢性肾脏病心肾结局的潜力:EASi-KIDNEY试验的理论依据
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2025 May 30;40(6):1175-1186. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae263.

选择性醛固酮合酶抑制剂治疗未控制高血压的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors in uncontrolled hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Louat Abdelaziz, Dwikat Mohammad, Nounou Mohamedhen Vall, Abdulhamid Salaheddin M, Abdelaziz Ali M, Ibrahim Amr, Sabouret Pierre, Elhadi Muhammed

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Casablanca, University of Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco.

Faculty of Medicine, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

出版信息

Clin Hypertens. 2025 Dec 1;31:e41. doi: 10.5646/ch.2025.31.e41. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.5646/ch.2025.31.e41
PMID:41362679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12682404/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Earlier Aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs) were non-selective, with a risk of cortisol insufficiency. A new generation of ASIs has emerged with improved selectivity and pharmacological properties, although their efficacy and safety remain debated. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of selective ASIs in adults with uncontrolled primary hypertension. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 6 databases/registries, comparing selective ASIs with placebo in adults aged ≥ 18 years with primary uncontrolled hypertension. Quality was assessed using the risk of bias 2 tool. Random-effects models were used to pool mean differences for continuous variables and calculate odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes. Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Five RCTs, involving 2,456 patients, were included. Least-squares mean (LSM) systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly lower with ASIs than placebo in both standard-dose (difference in LSM [LSMD], -9.05 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.98 to -7.12; < 0.001) and high-dose regimens (LSMD, -9.04 mmHg; 95% CI, -10.99 to -7.08; < 0.001). LSM diastolic blood pressure was also significantly lower with ASIs using standard dose (LSMD, -3.54 mmHg; 95% CI, -4.99 to -2.09; < 0.001) and high dose (LSMD, -4.17 mmHg; 95% CI, -5.72 to -2.62; < 0.001) compared with placebo. For safety endpoints, mild hyperkalemia (5.5-6 mmol/L) was more frequent with ASIs at both standard dose (OR, 7.50; 95% CI, 2.46 to 22.85; < 0.001) and high dose (OR, 11.63; 95% CI, 3.82 to 35.39; < 0.001). The rate of moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia (greater than 6 mmol/L) was comparable between the ASI and placebo groups for standard doses. In contrast, high doses were associated with an increased rate in the ASI group (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.10 to 17.82; = 0.036). The certainty of evidence was high for both SBP and mild hyperkalemia, and moderate for moderate to severe hyperkalemia. Selective ASIs appear to be a promising treatment in terms of efficacy and safety for uncontrolled hypertensive patients. Larger RCTs with extended follow-up periods are warranted to establish long-term evidence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Identifier: CRD420251108664.

摘要

未标注

早期的醛固酮合酶抑制剂(ASIs)是非选择性的,存在皮质醇不足的风险。新一代的ASIs已经出现,其选择性和药理特性有所改善,尽管它们的疗效和安全性仍存在争议。这项荟萃分析评估了选择性ASIs在未控制的原发性高血压成人患者中的疗效和安全性。我们从6个数据库/登记处中选择了随机对照试验(RCTs),比较了选择性ASIs与安慰剂在年龄≥18岁的原发性未控制高血压成人患者中的效果。使用偏倚风险2工具评估质量。随机效应模型用于汇总连续变量的平均差异,并计算二元结局的比值比(ORs)。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法对证据的确定性进行评级。纳入了5项RCTs,涉及2456例患者。在标准剂量(最小二乘均值[LSM]差异[LSMD],-9.05 mmHg;95%置信区间[CI],-10.98至-7.12;P<0.001)和高剂量方案(LSMD,-9.04 mmHg;95% CI,-10.99至-7.08;P<0.001)下,与安慰剂相比,ASIs治疗时LSM收缩压(SBP)显著更低。使用标准剂量(LSMD,-3.54 mmHg;95% CI,-4.99至-2.09;P<0.001)和高剂量(LSMD,-4.17 mmHg;95% CI,-5.72至-2.62;P<0.001)的ASIs治疗时,LSM舒张压也显著低于安慰剂。对于安全性终点,在标准剂量(OR,7.50;95% CI,2.46至22.85;P<0.001)和高剂量(OR,11.63;95% CI,3.82至35.39;P<0.001)下,ASIs治疗时轻度高钾血症(5.5 - 6 mmol/L)更为常见。标准剂量下,ASI组和安慰剂组中重度高钾血症(大于6 mmol/L)的发生率相当。相比之下,高剂量时ASI组的发生率增加(OR,4.43;95% CI,1.10至17.82;P = 0.036)。SBP和轻度高钾血症的证据确定性高,中度至重度高钾血症的证据确定性为中度。就疗效和安全性而言,选择性ASIs似乎是未控制高血压患者的一种有前景的治疗方法。有必要进行更大规模、随访期更长的RCTs以确立长期证据。

试验注册

PROSPERO标识符:CRD420251108664。