Atkinson K, Wells D G, Clink H M, Kay H E, Powles R, McElwain T J
Br J Cancer. 1974 Sep;30(3):272-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1974.191.
Seventy-eight adult patients with acute leukaemia were classified cytologically into 3 categories: acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) or acute undifferentiated leukaemia (AUL). The periodic acid-Schiff stain was of little value in differentiating the 3 groups. The treatment response in each group was different: 94% of patients with ALL (16/17) achieved complete remission with prednisone, vincristine and other drugs in standard use in childhood ALL; 59% of patients with AML (27/46) achieved complete remission with cytosine arabinoside and daunorubicin (22 patients), or 6-thioguanine and cyclophosphamide (2 patients), 6-thioguanine, cyclophosphamide and Adriamycin (1 patient), and cytosine and Adriamycin (1 patient); only 2 out of 14 patients (14%) with acute undifferentiated leukaemia achieved complete remission using cytosine and daunorubicin after an initial trial of prednisone and vincristine had failed. Prednisone and vincristine would seem to be of no value in acute undifferentiated leukaemia. It would seem also that no benefit is obtained by classifying all patients with acute leukaemia over 20 years of age as "adult acute leukaemia" and treating them with the same polypharmaceutical regimen. The problems posed by each disease are different and such a policy serves only to obscure them.
78例成年急性白血病患者经细胞学检查分为3类:急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)、急性髓细胞白血病(AML)或急性未分化白血病(AUL)。过碘酸-希夫染色对区分这3组的价值不大。每组的治疗反应各不相同:94%的ALL患者(16/17)使用泼尼松、长春新碱及儿童ALL常用的其他药物后达到完全缓解;59%的AML患者(27/46)使用阿糖胞苷和柔红霉素(22例患者)、或6-硫鸟嘌呤和环磷酰胺(2例患者)、6-硫鸟嘌呤、环磷酰胺和阿霉素(1例患者)、以及阿糖胞苷和阿霉素(1例患者)后达到完全缓解;14例急性未分化白血病患者中,在初次试用泼尼松和长春新碱失败后,仅2例(14%)使用阿糖胞苷和柔红霉素达到完全缓解。泼尼松和长春新碱似乎对急性未分化白血病无价值。将所有20岁以上的急性白血病患者归类为“成人急性白血病”并采用相同的多药联合方案进行治疗,似乎也没有益处。每种疾病带来的问题各不相同,这样的策略只会掩盖这些问题。