• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算研究揭示了关键基因和相关网络在鹰嘴豆受尖孢镰刀菌诱导的枯萎病条件下调节防御机制中的作用。

Computational studies deciphered the role of key genes and associated networks regulating the defense mechanism in chickpea under f. sp. induced wilt condition.

作者信息

Chaudhary Anjali, Arunachalam Annamalai, Lakshmi P T V

机构信息

Phytomatics Lab, Department of Bioinformatics, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India.

Department of Food Science and Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India.

出版信息

Plant Signal Behav. 2026 Dec 31;21(1):2631915. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2026.2631915. Epub 2026 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1080/15592324.2026.2631915
PMID:41705620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12928610/
Abstract

, a nutritionally rich legume and a key Rabi crop, is severely impacted by vascular wilt caused by f. sp. , leading to substantial yield loss. To understand molecular reprogramming, a transcriptomic dataset of chickpea seedling roots exposed to fungal infection at 7 and 12 d post-inoculation (dpi) was analyzed. The comparison was made between the control and stressed at 7 and 12 dpi (C_7 vs S_7 and C_12 vs S_12) to be compared against stressed at 7 vs 12 dpi (S_7 vs S_12). The analyses included differentially expressed gene (DEGs) patterns, protein interaction networks, hub genes, carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), resistance genes (R-genes), and transcription factor (TF) identifications at two different time points. It revealed a total of 894, 867, and 535 significant DEGs respectively, which were associated mainly with cell-wall modification, membrane components, pectinesterase inhibitor activity, terpene synthase activity, and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Further, the protein‒protein interaction network revealed that hub genes associated with chloroplast-localized reactive oxygen species scavenging activity and CAZyme, particularly glycosyl hydrolase 28 (GH28), to be involved during the early phase of infection. R-genes belonging to the classes of KIN (kinase domain), RLP (receptor-like protein), and RLK (receptor-like kinase) were significantly expressed while TFs, bHLH (basic helix-loop-helix), and GeBP (glabrous-enhancer-binding protein) were downregulated with prolonged infection. Hence, the overall study identified the key regulators, orchestrating the defense molecular mechanisms in relation to the time course of infection by the pathogen.

摘要

鹰嘴豆是一种营养丰富的豆类,也是重要的冬季作物,受到尖孢镰刀菌引起的维管束枯萎病的严重影响,导致产量大幅损失。为了解分子重编程情况,分析了接种后7天和12天暴露于真菌感染的鹰嘴豆幼苗根系的转录组数据集。在对照与7天和12天胁迫处理组(C_7 vs S_7和C_12 vs S_12)之间进行比较,并与7天和12天胁迫处理组之间(S_7 vs S_12)进行对比。分析包括两个不同时间点的差异表达基因(DEG)模式、蛋白质相互作用网络、枢纽基因、碳水化合物活性酶(CAZyme)、抗性基因(R基因)和转录因子(TF)鉴定。结果分别共鉴定出894、867和535个显著差异表达基因,这些基因主要与细胞壁修饰、膜成分、果胶酯酶抑制剂活性、萜烯合酶活性以及次生代谢物的生物合成有关。此外,蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络显示,与叶绿体定位的活性氧清除活性和CAZyme相关的枢纽基因,特别是糖基水解酶28(GH28),在感染早期发挥作用。属于KIN(激酶结构域)、RLP(类受体蛋白)和RLK(类受体激酶)类别的R基因显著表达,而随着感染时间延长,TFs、bHLH(碱性螺旋-环-螺旋)和GeBP(无毛增强子结合蛋白)下调。因此,总体研究确定了关键调节因子,它们在病原体感染的时间进程中协调防御分子机制。

相似文献

1
Computational studies deciphered the role of key genes and associated networks regulating the defense mechanism in chickpea under f. sp. induced wilt condition.计算研究揭示了关键基因和相关网络在鹰嘴豆受尖孢镰刀菌诱导的枯萎病条件下调节防御机制中的作用。
Plant Signal Behav. 2026 Dec 31;21(1):2631915. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2026.2631915. Epub 2026 Feb 18.
2
The transcriptional response to yellow and wilt disease, caused by race 6 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Ciceris in two contrasting chickpea cultivars.尖孢镰刀菌鹰嘴豆专化型6号生理小种引起的黄萎病在两个对比鹰嘴豆品种中的转录反应
BMC Genomics. 2025 Feb 4;26(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11308-3.
3
Multi-omics reveals DEAD-box RNA helicase 20 as key protein enhancing wilt resistance in transgenic chickpea.
Plant Cell Rep. 2025 Dec 3;44(12):289. doi: 10.1007/s00299-025-03675-8.
4
Small RNA sequencing analysis provides novel insights into microRNA-mediated regulation of defense responses in chickpea against Fusarium wilt infection.小RNA测序分析为鹰嘴豆抗枯萎病感染过程中microRNA介导的防御反应调控提供了新见解。
Planta. 2025 Jan 3;261(2):23. doi: 10.1007/s00425-024-04599-5.
5
Chickpea defense against dual stresses of salt and Fusarium wilt is enhanced through selected bHLH transcription factors carrying the bHLH-MYC_N domain.通过携带bHLH-MYC_N结构域的特定bHLH转录因子,鹰嘴豆对盐胁迫和枯萎病双重胁迫的防御能力得到增强。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025 Jan;218:109314. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.109314. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
6
Trichoderma mediate early and enhanced lignifications in chickpea during Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris infection.木霉在感染尖孢镰刀菌(Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris)过程中介导鹰嘴豆的早期和增强的木质化。
J Basic Microbiol. 2019 Jan;59(1):74-86. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201800212. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
Analysis of root proteome unravels differential molecular responses during compatible and incompatible interaction between chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri Race1 (Foc1).鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)与尖孢镰刀菌鹰嘴豆专化型1号生理小种(Foc1)亲和与非亲和互作期间根系蛋白质组分析揭示了不同的分子响应。
BMC Genomics. 2014 Nov 3;15(1):949. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-949.
8
Inheritance of Resistance to Chickpea Fusarium Wilt Disease ( f. sp. Race 2) in a Wide-Cross × Mapping Family.宽交 × 作图群体中菜豆枯萎病菌( f. sp. Race 2)抗性的遗传
Genes (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;15(6):819. doi: 10.3390/genes15060819.
9
Inhibition of multiple defense responsive pathways by CaWRKY70 transcription factor promotes susceptibility in chickpea under Fusarium oxysporum stress condition.钙依赖型 WRKY 转录因子 CaWRKY70 抑制多条防御响应途径从而促进羽扇豆在尖孢镰刀菌胁迫条件下的易感性。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02527-9.
10
In planta and soil quantification of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris and evaluation of Fusarium wilt resistance in chickpea with a newly developed quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay.利用新建立的定量聚合酶链式反应检测方法,对菜豆根腐病菌(尖孢镰刀菌古巴专化型)在植株和土壤中的定量以及菜豆抗枯萎病性进行评价。
Phytopathology. 2011 Feb;101(2):250-62. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-10-0190.